Defense Player Evaluations

[Jassid82]

First off, Golson isn't having a field day on any team until he can prove he can throw the ball consistently and make good decisions. I got a chuckle at the posters who fear that guy.

Armstrong looked bigger too btw. Thick in the lower body. Maybe it just looked that way from where I was sitting.

I thought overall the defense played well enough to win. Contrary to what many think, blowing big leads happens to the best of them. Time to move on to Cincy.

 

[ScubaCane]

AQM was in the backfield **** near every play with them holding the sh*t out of him.... Chad too. McCord was all game as well, he missed quite a few sacks to be honest.

They held AQM every play. A lot of the holds were arms full extended so idk how the refs didn't see it

This right here, if I cared about this crappy team I would have been ****ed at all the holding calls that weren't made.

 

[onplane]

Kirby a B - ? That's being kind

I thought Kirby was much improved over the FAU game where he looked totally lost. I do agree he is hesitant to react quickly which results in gains that should not happen.

 

[DC Dog Nuts]

Kirby a B - ? That's being kind

I thought Kirby was much improved over the FAU game where he looked totally lost. I do agree he is hesitant to react quickly which results in gains that should not happen.

The kids on D look slow and passive the majority of the time in this scheme. It/he doesn't know how to get kids into situations where they can just play football. Football at this level isn't meant to be a complete thinking mans game. That is more reserved for the NFL.