This stat is not true, as far as I can tell.
[TABLE="width: 500"]
[TR]
[TD]UL[/TD]
[TD]7-3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]FAMU
[/TD]
[TD]2-8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Ark St[/TD]
[TD]6-3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Nebraska[/TD]
[TD]8-1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Duke[/TD]
[TD]8-1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]GT[/TD]
[TD]8-2[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Cincy[/TD]
[TD]5-3[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]VT[/TD]
[TD]4-5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]UNC[/TD]
[TD]4-5[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Total[/TD]
[TD]52-31 - 62.6%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Win % of teams Miami beat[/TD]
[TD]53.7%[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Win % of teams that beat Miami[/TD]
[TD]79.3%[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
In other words, we do OK against mediocre teams, and we lose to good teams. I fail to see the importance of strength of schedule when you're losing to the better teams on your schedule every year anyway. When you're comparing two or more teams with good records, strength of schedule might actually mean something.