For me, it is simple, keep the points off the ***ing board.
I am down for the DC that keeps the most points off the board.
You're missing crucial point. This sounds like Al's defense. It is designed for slow white kids -- not our talent base. Al failed for that very reason. This guy will too unless he ditches it because he has a choice. Coaches tend to stick with "their" thing, as we saw with Al. We do not need this defense and it still will not work here.
You have no idea what you are talking about. If you got that is sounds like Al's defense from any of those videos and it won't work here because its designed for slow white kids, your IQ is probably below 20.
My response is based on the OP. I am sure you can understand that with my limited IQ, evaluating film is much
to hard for me. However, you have large numbers of heavy slow white kids with higher IQs than me, a read first defense can work, but without speed a react first might not. That might explain why schools like psu used such defenses -- to
bet us, if you recall. Our talent base allows a choice because of our speed. If you fatten the kids up enough to play the read defense, they
loose speed two ways --- read first and weight.
I would accept your appraisal of my IQ, but having obtained my Doctorate by age 24 makes that a little difficult to wrap my head around. Either way, 4 years of fat boy defense is enough for me. I want the react first aggression our kids have played since youth that focuses on turnovers and negative plays, NOT merely points. Defense does more than limit points. It sets the tone for the game and can create fear and intimidation. Come out of mommy's closet and go into the world.
