Dabo doing the Lords work yet again.

Syracuse is worse than Wazzou, Wash, Oregon, Utah, Stanford. USC would probably just out talent them. FSU is trash. BC was trash too.

Bama also played TAMU.

Syracuse would beat wazzu and Utah, 50/50 for Oregon, and be competitive with Stanford and USC, only Washington would be a prohibitive favorite. So......

Against that lineup, they could easily go 4-2 and I would say no worse than 3-3
 
Advertisement
KrazyCane is that you?

Exactly

You come into a Dabo thread where 95% of us are saying "******* Dabo" and feel the need to counter argue against whom Clemson fans? ACC conference fan boys? But the best part is you do it by saying Texas and :insert ****** PAC 12 teams: are legit competition.

Stop typing good god.

Almost universally people agree the PAC12 is the worst Power 5 conference and that the Big 12 is ***.

Jesus
 
Advertisement
In the ACC Clemson plays 0 good teams. The only team with even close to the talent of Clemson is FSU and they lost a lot of their talent due to graduation/transfers and now Willies schitty recruiting.

They have a cake walk to the playoffs each year. The only real risk of a loss is the OOC games.

No teams besides Clemson have over 50% bc ratio(FSU might, but its barely over 50% now).

The ACC had 1 ranked team last year besides Clemson.

The big 12 has 2 good teams in Texas and OU. Both recruit at a high level and have above 50% bc ratio. Big 12 had 3 teams finished ranked last year.

The Pac 12 has 3 teams recruiting at a high level(USC, Wash, and Oregon) and 2 teams that are recruiting at good levels(Stanford and UCLA, albeit UCLA is falling off). Plus Wash st. and Utah who do more with less. They had 5 teams finished ranked.

We all know the B1g and SEC are harder paths.

It is pretty obvious that Clemson has an easier path than any Pac or Big 12 team.
I could have swear you were saying willie Taggart was as great recruiter just the other day.
 
Syracuse would beat wazzu and Utah, 50/50 for Oregon, and be competitive with Stanford and USC, only Washington would be a prohibitive favorite. So......

Against that lineup, they could easily go 4-2 and I would say no worse than 3-3

I don't see Cuse beating any of those teams to be honest. We can't prove it either way besides maybe Utah. Maybe Wazzu if they played in the rain.

Either way this basically proves my point. Clemsons hardest in conf opponent last year was Cuse. Washington had to play 3 teams that were better than them. They had the harder path to the playoffs which was my point.
 
I don't see Cuse beating any of those teams to be honest. We can't prove it either way besides maybe Utah. Maybe Wazzu if they played in the rain.

Either way this basically proves my point. Clemsons hardest in conf opponent last year was Cuse. Washington had to play 3 teams that were better than them. They had the harder path to the playoffs which was my point.

Well they beat Clemson once, and almost beat them at home, all with in the last two years. They are a well coached team. So they could easily go 4-2, imo. Without even talking about Boston College. I’m certainly not an ACC hype guy, but the Pac 12 is ***, more *** than the ACC
 
Exactly

You come into a Dabo thread where 95% of us are saying "******* Dabo" and feel the need to counter argue against whom Clemson fans? ACC conference fan boys? But the best part is you do it by saying Texas and :insert ****** PAC 12 teams: are legit competition.

Stop typing good god.

Almost universally people agree the PAC12 is the worst Power 5 conference and that the Big 12 is ***.

Jesus

Literally no one, but people on this board consider the Pac or Big 12 worse than the ACC. When you take Clemson out of the mix(and the top team out of each conference) to figure out who has the harder path you would have an even tougher time finding someone that thinks the ACC is better than either of those confs.
 
Well they beat Clemson once, and almost beat them at home, all with in the last two years. They are a well coached team. So they could easily go 4-2, imo. Without even talking about Boston College. I’m certainly not an ACC hype guy, but the Pac 12 is ***, more *** than the ACC

They certainly are a well coached team, but they lack the talent. I agree the pac 12 is bad, but when we are talking about easiest path to the playoffs. If you look at Clemsons conf schedule and Washs conf schedule. Clemson had the easier path. The only reason the ACC is considered by some to be better is because Clemson pulls it up.
 
Advertisement
Plus on ESPN this morning they were calling Nick Saban more interesting than Dabo. They only way Dabo would be more interesting is if his name was associated with being hired at Alabama. Lulz you can't make this up.
 
Literally no one, but people on this board consider the Pac or Big 12 worse than the ACC. When you take Clemson out of the mix(and the top team out of each conference) to figure out who has the harder path you would have an even tougher time finding someone that thinks the ACC is better than either of those confs.

Fall on that sword. Fall right on it. You can do it.
 
I am not going to hate on Dabo. He turned Clemson into the thorn in Bama/SEC's side we were supposed to be.
 
He is a great recruiter, considering how bad his team has been doing. Most people would be scraping up 3 stars after last season. He is somehow still beating teams for elite kids.

However, he is still not recruiting at a high level.
ITs why Fisher left he asked for more money to recruit, once they said no he left. He wanted to be on par with Clemson and FSU would not do it behind the scenes. Fishers knows what it takes to win a title and got out of there when people up top werent comitted or couldnt afford it.
 
Back
Top