I add this concurring opinion to underscore the NCAA’s remaining compensation rules also raise serious questions under the antitrust laws….And the Court stresses that the NCAA is not otherwise entitled to an exemption from antitrust laws. (Radovich v NFL 1957). As a result, absent legislation or a negotiated agreement between the NCAA and the student-athletes, the NCAA’s remaining compensation rules should be subject to ordinary rule of reason scrutiny. …. Under the rule of reason, the NCAA must provide a legally valid pro-competitive justification for its remaining compensation rules. As I see it, however, the NCAA may lack such a justification……..