Yeah, and somehow I keep seeing Iowa State out of the B12 projected to be a four seed when they had 10 losses. That makes no sense. Their schedule doesn’t make up for that kind of loss count.
What I’m not seeing discussed a lot today, which was a comforting factor back when this deal was signed was supposed contract “look ins” which could adjust the payments to the ACC if the deal got too far away from other conferences. Was that all just a load of crap?!
funny that miami (both Rad and James) signed off on this deal they hate.
ok thats fine. not every school wants unequal distribution fwiw. as you said, everyone needs to sign off. you wont get everyone to sign off. also, the schools just wont stop playing. look everyone is basically ****ed until someone ponies up hundreds of million to break out, another conference says well pay it for you, or ESPN tears up the entire tv deal.
thats all BS. ACC is down this year but so is every other conference really. you think I respect murderers row in Tuscaloosa when UK is down, UF sucks, and Tenn has proven to be overrated.
I didn't wanna say it but yeahhhhhh.....I'm sure Dan would like to have that one back.
can't ***** now when you were totally fine w it before. it really hurts Clemson the most tho. I haven't looked it up, but I would guess they get the highest ratings share of any one in the conference including us along w revenue. we haven't been good in forever, but we also did have like half our season on RSN last year even w the ACCN which tells you all you need to know about what the tv people thought about us (likely took a look at our numbers and saw what ratings we have been getting this year).
Even Rad?
Was he an AD that signed off on it ? That’s rhetorical
Because the ratings of programs that are down or not, the only factor that are included the brown value, including the types of people who pay to watch those ads in the future are also important in though this is just one example Miami is a top 10 brand in many ways that networks and advertisers look at it. So the analysis is yes a combination of recency (ratings), historical,future projection, and brand Strength. Advertisers and thus networks pay more for certain eyeballs - it’s not just “college football viewers”.
take This with a grain of salt but it’s not completely off on how other more used studies look at things during negotiations
Dude. I know. I’m not posting paid for market research reports that report the same info. I’m done trying to explain this to you. Enjoy.Bro, no offense, but this a 247 author opinion article. Furthermore, brand & viewership r two totally different topics. Advertisers r not paying top $$ for a product that’s rarely seen. That’s not an opinion, that’s a fact. The fact is, the viewerships of our games have precipitously dropped, which is why we’ve been relegated to the B group. Our games were once upon a time nationally televised w/ frequency, which made us the big fish for the ACC, that’s no longer the case; hence, we have threads on this board asking how to watch us! Lol.
This further proves my point:
Here's the most popular college football team in every state, based on Google search data
Data from Google Trends shows what the most searched college football teams are in the country, and in each state. We want to know your thoughts.www.usatoday.com
P.S- u may do this, and I respect that, but when I have family who actually work for the network of the parent company for the ACC Network, pls understand I’m not talking from an opinion standpoint vs. data standpoint.
Well hopefully it's only iron clad because it's never been tested before...
Ok, so if you are in the biz, what do you know about the contractual “look ins” that the ACC supposedly has to ensure its deal doesn’t get too far away from competition over its 20 years span. There was supposed to be protection.Bro, no offense, but this a 247 author opinion article. Furthermore, brand & viewership r two totally different topics. Advertisers r not paying top $$ for a product that’s rarely seen. That’s not an opinion, that’s a fact. The fact is, the viewerships of our games have precipitously dropped, which is why we’ve been relegated to the B group. Our games were once upon a time nationally televised w/ frequency, which made us the big fish for the ACC, that’s no longer the case; hence, we have threads on this board asking how to watch us! Lol.
This further proves my point:
Here's the most popular college football team in every state, based on Google search data
Data from Google Trends shows what the most searched college football teams are in the country, and in each state. We want to know your thoughts.www.usatoday.com
P.S- u may do this, and I respect that, but when I have family who actually work for the network of the parent company for the ACC Network, pls understand I’m not talking from an opinion standpoint vs. data standpoint.
Why not have an out at the halfway mark to renegotiate if the college football landscape changed?
We're still a top 10 brand by many metrics. Think about that. As bad as we've been for 2 decades, many still consider Miami Hurricanes a top 10 brand.
Imagine if we were just a perennial top 10 or top 15 team for the last 2 decades with occasional seasons like 2017. In 2017 with the turnover chain and the undefeated season you had the sports world tuned into Miami.. Not just college football but everybody. Rappers. Graphics on the screen. Other professional sports and athletes were referencing it and mimicking it. ALL THE OTHER college football programs were mimicking it. And that was just from 10 wins. It was nuts.
Miami still has a ton of brand potential (for now).
****, i don't watch Canes FB, last yr was 2017.Bro, no offense, but this a 247 author opinion article. Furthermore, brand & viewership r two totally different topics. Advertisers r not paying top $$ for a product that’s rarely seen. That’s not an opinion, that’s a fact. The fact is, the viewerships of our games have precipitously dropped, which is why we’ve been relegated to the B group. Our games were once upon a time nationally televised w/ frequency, which made us the big fish for the ACC, that’s no longer the case; hence, we have threads on this board asking how to watch us! Lol.
This further proves my point:
Here's the most popular college football team in every state, based on Google search data
Data from Google Trends shows what the most searched college football teams are in the country, and in each state. We want to know your thoughts.www.usatoday.com
P.S- u may do this, and I respect that, but when I have family who actually work for the network of the parent company for the ACC Network, pls understand I’m not talking from an opinion standpoint vs. data standpoint.
