forums

Tears Colorado Tears

pyhooya said:
Well Prime has lost to 3 current unranked teams this year with supposedly the first 2 picks in the draft. How many teams has he beaten that had winning records?
Click to expand...
I'm not making excuses the original argument was poor.
 
Advertisement
Cylo said:
True you never know. I wonder how good Washington State would have been in this years Pac-12
Click to expand...
They were 5-7 with Cam Ward last year. 8-3 this year. The drop in competition helped them a lot too. They also crushed Colorado last year so the Buffaloes even lost to bad Pac12 teams.
 
cway313 said:
This is terrible. You're attempting to use a 1 year sample size to call the PAC-12 legitimate. The real fact is that before Lanning got to OU and before Deboer resurrected Washington that conference was habitually a joke. Playing Utah (6-5), USC (5-5), UCLA (4-6), Arizona (4-7), Utah (4-7), CAL (6-5), Stanford 3-8, Oregon State (5-6) wouldn't have been the gauntlet you are attempting to portray.
Click to expand...
You’re attempting to make the argument “the Pac12 was never a good conference”. Which has nothing to do with the topic which is Colorado and Deion Sanders. But even if that was the topic, Historically that conference has been one of the top conferences in all of college football. Maybe not to the level of the SEC or Big10 but certainly better than the ACC and miles better than whatever conferences a majority of the current Big 12 teams were part of.

Now move the goal posts again.
 
DTP said:
You’re attempting to make the argument “the Pac12 was never a good conference”. Which has nothing to do with the topic which is Colorado and Deion Sanders. But even if that was the topic, Historically that conference has been one of the top conferences in all of college football. Maybe not to the level of the SEC or Big10 but certainly better than the ACC and miles better than whatever conferences a majority of the current Big 12 teams were part of.

Now move the goal posts again.
Click to expand...
Your post said they benefited from playing in a (g5) lesser conference. If the mighty PAC-12 which was comparable to the Big12 that had Oklahoma and Texas (playoff team last year) up until this year still existed nothing shows they would have struggled. That conference was a joke. You can't make a valid argument to explain how they would fare worse playing 8 teams hovering around .500.
 
Advertisement
jrock2332 said:
I know he got the QB but you are assuming the QB will be the *****. Recent history has shown you are better getting a experienced transfer QB with NFL potential as opposed to a high schooler. Would you be willing to bet your season on a true freshman QB. As a matter of fact the only decent true freshman QB I've seen in college is the kid at ncst.
Click to expand...
That team is in a lot of trouble next year without Shruddle and Hunter. I mean it's going to get ugly LOL
 
cway313 said:
Your post said they benefited from playing in a (g5) lesser conference. If the mighty PAC-12 which was comparable to the Big12 that had Oklahoma and Texas (playoff team last year) up until this year still existed nothing shows they would have struggled. That conference was a joke. You can't make a valid argument to explain how they would fare worse playing 8 teams hovering around .500.
Click to expand...
K
 
cway313 said:
This is terrible. You're attempting to use a 1 year sample size to call the PAC-12 legitimate. The real fact is that before Lanning got to OU and before Deboer resurrected Washington that conference was habitually a joke. Playing Utah (6-5), USC (5-5), UCLA (4-6), Arizona (4-7), Utah (4-7), CAL (6-5), Stanford 3-8, Oregon State (5-6) wouldn't have been the gauntlet you are attempting to portray.
Click to expand...

Whoa whoa whoa… if the PAC-12 was never that strong….then… 👀

My man always playing chess here!
 
Advertisement
cway313 said:
I remember when you could have real discussions here. Now everything is about how much loyalty you have to Mario. 10-1 and board is uglier than it has ever been.
Click to expand...

No you don't. The main Miami board has been the same since Grassy. Some people support the head coach, some people think the head coach is an idiot. That has always been the same.
 
JD08 said:
But Deion recruited him. How much more do you need to know?

Cue the guy kneeling before Prime.
Click to expand...
Stupidity is the new norm I get it. If Colorado were in the sec or acc or the conference of Ohio state would they have a better record?
 
Advertisement
TaylorWalls said:
No you don't. The main Miami board has been the same since Grassy. Some people support the head coach, some people think the head coach is an idiot. That has always been the same.
Click to expand...
I'm too young for grassy. I started on ESPN message board.
 
Advertisement
cway313 said:
I remember when you could have real discussions here. Now everything is about how much loyalty you have to Mario. 10-1 and board is uglier than it has ever been.
Click to expand...
Absolutely.

We won yesterday, the defense had a good game, we pulled away for a nice close out to the regular season home schedule and there was playoff chaos that almost certainky helped us and the board cannot discuss any of it outside the context of Mario and we have a collective victim mentality while also having an inferiority complex.

But we are in the "Winning is Hard" era vs the Anyone, Anywhere, Any time Miami
 
Advertisement
Back
Top