In 2003, we had Beard, Parrish, Moore, Moss, and Winslow. Brock got to cook in that 2nd half against the gators and made up for his horrible play in the first half (in the pro set). Just because you run a spread, doesn't mean it has to be uptempo. We had more than enough at WR to do some damage. You theorize that running Brock out of a gun might have hurt the team, but playing Brock in a pro set DID hurt the team: the offense scored 6 against UT, 7 against VT, scored only 1 TD and needed a miracle comeback at home vs WVU, etc etc.
The entire point of this thread was that bad coaches put square pegs in round holes and don't utilize their talent properly. Coker was a bad coach, and by not catering to his QBs strengths, he hurt the team. QB is the most important position on the field. If Berlin is your guy, you design the offense around him. If you are incapable of doing that because you only know how to do one thing (ie Coker) then you put someone else in who fits your mold. (which Coker tried by benching Brock v Cuse and the offense still looked like crap). You can stick up for Coker all you want, but he was a coach who was afraid, conservative and inflexible, which is the exact opposite of what we should be looking for.