forums

Coach Richt Post-game... 'Most difficult situation in coaching tenure'

canezhonkey said:
^^^^ this dude is so petty that when I didn't agree with his post he looked up my old posts just to neg... what a *****, looking up stuff from months ago lol.
Click to expand...
You may want to close out of some of those tabs there chief.
 
Advertisement
305to954 said:
Bruh..having a number 1 difference maker at WR makes a diff in any offense unless your running the triple O..every team in the top 10 has a playmaker or 2 or more on the outside

Bama- 3
Clem - 3
Nort- 1
Mich- power run game and Gentry
UGA- 4
OU- Hollywood

And it would help if we had a QB to get it too 4 lol
Click to expand...
Your number 1 difference maker WR was unhealthy all year last year and caught a measly 24 passes. If your HC/OC, in year 3, can’t overcome the loss of 24 catches he’s garbage. You’re not making a good case for your boy Rickety.
 
KWConch said:
Bobby Bowden says hello.....sometimes the game just passes you by.
Click to expand...

Seems like reality has passed you by. Has the game passed coach bud foster by or did having to start 7 new players on defense have something to do with their performance this year. Coach richt says **** no!
 
1mg of Epi said:
Top 20 talent based on recruiting services, which happen to be very very accurate.

We don’t have a lot of developing talent. We have a lot of stunted, undeveloped talemt.

Those are all coaching issues. Everything u mention is coaching.

“it’s his 3rd year” “too 20 talent” are not hypotheticals. They are facts. They are reasons for this coach to have been able
To beat uva, gt duke, etc.



Oh and don’t expect a qb to somehow make Richts offense go... i assume u watched the Kaaya year. Accurate qb, same ****** O.

In all your excuse making, u seem to forget just how bad this coach is. He can’t beat uva with um talent. Or duke. Or .........

Richt has already failed here. He doesn’t have it in him to be a successful UM coach.
Click to expand...

No disrespect but anytime somebody tries to use star rankings/recruiting services as a point of reference when talking real football, i can never take them serious and talk football with them, means nothing.
 
Torocane said:
Two questions.

One...you do realize Butch made staff changes right?
He fired his DC and his SC coach and hired Schiano and Moffit.
Also had real issues to overcome not self inflicted issues like Richt.

Two...in his entire career as HC how many top 20 ranked offenses has Richt had?
I’ll give you a hint.....it’s one in 18 years
Click to expand...

Of course butch made changes but again, was it after year 3 or year 4.
As far as having top 20 offenses, how many years was coach richt the oc, and how many teams in the s.e.c conference have top 20 offenses in a defensive conference.

Let me help you, the question you might want to be asking is, how many top 20 offenses did Fsu have when coach richt was the o.c. than we might be able to see your point, but witha national title and 2 heisman trophy qb's, its gone be hard trying to understand what you trying to say, cause you not making sense.
 
The 2018 class for CIS is full of doozies. Some of the pearls of wisdom from the newbs are beyond head scratchers...Jesus, Buddha, allah make it stop! Strike them down! Maybe we just need old girl Tubman to hop on her soapbox and start one of her SJW rants, that might drive them off.

Go Canes!
 
Advertisement
Samson Doyo said:
The 2018 class for CIS is full of doozies. Some of the pearls of wisdom from the newbs are beyond head scratchers...Jesus, Buddha, allah make it stop! Strike them down! Maybe we just need old girl Tubman to hop on her soapbox and start one of her SJW rants, that might drive them off.

Go Canes!
Click to expand...
I mean, if you want SJW, you can get SJW.
 
Calvin said:
Of course butch made changes but again, was it after year 3 or year 4.
As far as having top 20 offenses, how many years was coach richt the oc, and how many teams in the s.e.c conference have top 20 offenses in a defensive conference.

Let me help you, the question you might want to be asking is, how many top 20 offenses did Fsu have when coach richt was the o.c. than we might be able to see your point, but witha national title and 2 heisman trophy qb's, its gone be hard trying to understand what you trying to say, cause you not making sense.
Click to expand...


Butch Davis made significant changes to his staff in year 4 and 5 of his tenure. See below.

Butch Davis time at UM
Year 1 - 1995

Year 2 -1996

Year 3 -1997

Year 4 -1998
Fires S/C coach he inherited from Erickson and hires Tommy Moffit as SC coach

Year 5 -1999
Butch fires Bill Miller and hires Greg Schiano as DC

Year 6 - 2000

As far as SEC teams with top 20 offenses during Richt time as HC.

2003
#18 Ole miss
#19 LSU

2004
#18 Auburn

2006
#9 LSU

2007
#3 Florida
#11 LSU
#13 Arkansas
#15 Kentucky

2008
#4 Florida

2009
#9 Arkansas
#10 Florida
#17 Auburn

2010
#7 Auburn
#17 Arkansas
#18 Alabama

2011
#15 Arkansas
#17 LSU
#20 Alabama

2012
#5 TAM
#12 Alabama

2013
#7 TAM
#12 Georgia
#13 Auburn
#14 Missouri
#17 Alabama

2014
# 15 Alabama
#17 miss st

2015
#8 ole miss

Not hard to understand.
You seem reluctant to hold Richt accountable for anything.
He has three classes he recruited on the team. He has made very questionable decisions when it comes to his staff. Nepotism with hiring his son etc.
He has to be responsible for something.
 
Last edited:
Jedi Master Cane said:
Because we have to be calculated with them otherwise they lose their impact.

Next season...they'll be flying in full glory and we've already discussed doing a billboard on US1 near campus. At this point I'm hoping he makes no changes this offseason which will help **** people off even more. That way when he loses the first game to our most hated rival, he's going to get fire and brimstone
Click to expand...

I love the way your mind works, sir!
 
Torocane said:
Butch Davis made significant changes to his staff in year 4 and 5 of his tenure. See below.

Butch Davis time at UM
Year 1 - 1995

Year 2 -1996

Year 3 -1997

Year 4 -1998
Fires S/C coach he inherited from Erickson and hires Tommy Moffit as SC coach

Year 5 -1999
Butch fires Bill Miller and hires Greg Schiano as DC

Year 6 - 2000

As far as SEC teams with top 20 offenses during Richt time as HC.

2003
#18 Ole miss
#19 LSU

2004
#18 Auburn

2006
#9 LSU

2007
#3 Florida
#11 LSU
#13 Arkansas
#15 Kentucky

2008
#4 Florida

2009
#9 Arkansas
#10 Florida
#17 Auburn

2010
#7 Auburn
#17 Arkansas
#18 Alabama

2011
#15 Arkansas
#17 LSU
#20 Alabama

2012
#5 TAM
#12 Alabama

2013
#7 TAM
#12 Georgia
#13 Auburn
#14 Missouri
#17 Alabama

2014
# 15 Alabama
#17 miss st

2015
#8 ole miss

Not hard to understand.
You seem reluctant to hold Richt accountable for anything.
He has three classes he recruited on the team. He has made very questionable decisions when it comes to his staff. Nepotism with hiring his son etc.
He has to be responsible for something.
Click to expand...

Boom
 
Calvin said:
No disrespect but anytime somebody tries to use star rankings/recruiting services as a point of reference when talking real football, i can never take them serious and talk football with them, means nothing.
Click to expand...
That’s unfortunate as it shows how little u actually know. It’s trendy for fans of teams who don’t get the blue chippers to talk about how meaningless rankings are. Unfortunately its untrue.

They’ve done study after study showing there’s a very high correlation between star ranking and player success as well as team wins, losses and rankings.

So sure, u can find the exception...the all American American who was a 2 star. But he’s just the exception. It’s pretty naive to think it doesn’t.

Go look it up.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/247spo...all-recruiting-rankings-matter-114611388/Amp/

http://footballscoop.com/news/stars-matter-recruiting-data-says/
 
Torocane said:
Butch Davis made significant changes to his staff in year 4 and 5 of his tenure. See below.

Butch Davis time at UM
Year 1 - 1995

Year 2 -1996

Year 3 -1997

Year 4 -1998
Fires S/C coach he inherited from Erickson and hires Tommy Moffit as SC coach

Year 5 -1999
Butch fires Bill Miller and hires Greg Schiano as DC

Year 6 - 2000

As far as SEC teams with top 20 offenses during Richt time as HC.

2003
#18 Ole miss
#19 LSU

2004
#18 Auburn

2006
#9 LSU

2007
#3 Florida
#11 LSU
#13 Arkansas
#15 Kentucky

2008
#4 Florida

2009
#9 Arkansas
#10 Florida
#17 Auburn

2010
#7 Auburn
#17 Arkansas
#18 Alabama

2011
#15 Arkansas
#17 LSU
#20 Alabama

2012
#5 TAM
#12 Alabama

2013
#7 TAM
#12 Georgia
#13 Auburn
#14 Missouri
#17 Alabama

2014
# 15 Alabama
#17 miss st

2015
#8 ole miss

Not hard to understand.
You seem reluctant to hold Richt accountable for anything.
He has three classes he recruited on the team. He has made very questionable decisions when it comes to his staff. Nepotism with hiring his son etc.
He has to be responsible for something.
Click to expand...

No, it just further proved my point about the fact that coach richt needs to keep the staff in tact, coach searels deserves to be here next year, cause he'll have better overall raw o-line talent to work with for the first time since he's been here, plus those guys who have been under him for 2 and 3 years will show whether coach searels belongs, we've actually been rushing the ball real well during the losing streak, and now with perry actually showing he might just be running the read option correctly, been saying it, perry was never keeping the ball on the read options, first game he's doing, opened up the whole offense.

The people blaming coach richt are clueless about player development. So i want to thank you guys for helping to prove the point of why coach richt needs to keep the staff in place for definitely one more year, just like butch did until after year 4, i actually dont think changes need to be made, coach richt knows how to call plays.
 
Advertisement
1mg of Epi said:
That’s unfortunate as it shows how little u actually know. It’s trendy for fans of teams who don’t get the blue chippers to talk about how meaningless rankings are. Unfortunately its untrue.

They’ve done study after study showing there’s a very high correlation between star ranking and player success as well as team wins, losses and rankings.

So sure, u can find the exception...the all American American who was a 2 star. But he’s just the exception. It’s pretty naive to think it doesn’t.

Go look it up.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/247spo...all-recruiting-rankings-matter-114611388/Amp/

http://footballscoop.com/news/stars-matter-recruiting-data-says/
Click to expand...

You can keep believing in those systems and being a star gazer all you want, how many so called 5 stars that dont play well get labeled "bust" but i've seen nobody but me say, how bout they not "bust" how bout somebody got they evals wrong. Its stupid to hear commentators refer to star rankings during games and than start talking about so and so is not living up to his ranking, how about maybe he was real good at the highschool level where he was from, but is just not that good in college. Just like you got some players who are good in college but arent good pro's.

If you feel comfortable being a mel kiper jr. of the highschool ranks have at it!
 
Calvin said:
You can keep believing in those systems and being a star gazer all you want, how many so called 5 stars that dont play well get labeled "bust" but i've seen nobody but me say, how bout they not "bust" how bout somebody got they evals wrong. Its stupid to hear commentators refer to star rankings during games and than start talking about so and so is not living up to his ranking, how about maybe he was real good at the highschool level where he was from, but is just not that good in college. Just like you got some players who are good in college but arent good pro's.

If you feel comfortable being a mel kiper jr. of the highschool ranks have at it!
Click to expand...
You can find exceptions all day. The rule still holds. Teams with higher starred players win more games. Teams with higher starred players best teams with fewer starred players. The notable exception being your Miami hurricanes... where talent can’t overcome coaching.

Very very few 5 star players bust. Over half make it to the NFL. Compare that to 3 stars, where a tiny fraction make it to the league.

Evals are wrong sometimes.... just not often.
 
1mg of Epi said:
You can find exceptions all day. The rule still holds. Teams with higher starred players win more games. Teams with higher starred players best teams with fewer starred players. The notable exception being your Miami hurricanes... where talent can’t overcome coaching.

Very very few 5 star players bust. Over half make it to the NFL. Compare that to 3 stars, where a tiny fraction make it to the league.

Again, if that's your what you rely on for your football knowledge have at it, the Great news is, our coaching staff doesnt and most smart coaches dont, they trust their own evals, but if you are one of those who never played football or been around talented players, i understand why you so adamant about relying on those services. You are probably one of those who live and die by class rankings.

Evals are wrong sometimes.... just not often.
Click to expand...
 

25 years ago you may have had a point w the recruiting services. Not today. I’m curious tho... where are you seeing discrepancies between a recruiting service eval and a teams own evaluation? There really aren’t any... all the best teams recruit the same best players.


so I suppose that’s why you’re able to still support this staff... you just put on blinders, so it’s easy to believe whatever Feels more comfortable. And I can see why you’d be more comfortable believing we have a talent issue than a coaching issue.
 
Back
Top