Coach Richt, Dugans & more... Post Practice Presser 8/4/17

Memnon

Dejazmach
Premium
Joined
May 14, 2016
Messages
33,208
[video=youtube_share;j6Tb0XM2zCc]https://youtu.be/j6Tb0XM2zCc[/video]
[video=youtube_share;JD6HviGvwKU]https://youtu.be/JD6HviGvwKU[/video]
[video=youtube_share;mhjGmAEwBeI]https://youtu.be/mhjGmAEwBeI[/video]
[video=youtube_share;a66Up9dQAmo]https://youtu.be/a66Up9dQAmo[/video]
[video=youtube_share;Sza3LKNWlrE]https://youtu.be/Sza3LKNWlrE[/video]
 
Advertisement
Walton saying all the right things with good confidence.
Saying Perry is looking good on Zone reads. I like the sound of that.
 
Coach Richt talks about TE depth as if he didn't know that was going to happen.

Either move Langham to TE, or maybe not kick Haskins off the team for minor stuff.
 
I'd like to see Langham at TE because he's far more likely to see the field there than he is anywhere else.
 
Advertisement
Doubt it's "minor stuff" that gets a player kicked off the team.
It was smoking weed & missing a few classes.

I'm not saying you let a guy get away with whatever he wants, I fully understand Richt's policy & agree with it to an extent.

All I'm saying is, Richt shouldn't have any issues with the TE depth, either move Langham to TE or consider the lack of depth before you give Hask the boot.
 
Advertisement
Coach Richt talks about TE depth as if he didn't know that was going to happen.

Either move Langham to TE, or maybe not kick Haskins off the team for minor stuff.

Haskins had a multitude of chances. It's nobody's fault but his own.
Didn't say it wasn't his fault, you all are misinterpreting what I'm saying.

I'm not defending Haskins, I'm saying Richt should've known that was going to happen.
 
Coach Richt talks about TE depth as if he didn't know that was going to happen.

Either move Langham to TE, or maybe not kick Haskins off the team for minor stuff.

Haskins had a multitude of chances. It's nobody's fault but his own.
Didn't say it wasn't his fault, you all are misinterpreting what I'm saying.

I'm not defending Haskins, I'm saying Richt should've known that was going to happen.

Agreed.
 
Based on his facial expressions it looks like malek slipped up by saying kosi was running with the ones.
 
Advertisement
Based on his facial expressions it looks like malek slipped up by saying kosi was running with the ones.

Think it was partly the way the fake news media jumped on that statement. He didn't realize it was a big deal until then, but the truth is it's meaningless. Everyone is rotating. Woohooo.
 
Coach Richt talks about TE depth as if he didn't know that was going to happen.

Either move Langham to TE, or maybe not kick Haskins off the team for minor stuff.

I'm good with more 4 WR sets. We don't need to play like Stanford or Michigan with 2 TE bunch sets all night.
 
Advertisement
Coach Richt talks about TE depth as if he didn't know that was going to happen.

Either move Langham to TE, or maybe not kick Haskins off the team for minor stuff.

I'm good with more 4 WR sets. We don't need to play like Stanford or Michigan with 2 TE bunch sets all night.
I agree, we have too many WR's to not use them as much as possible.
 
Doubt it's "minor stuff" that gets a player kicked off the team.
It was smoking weed & missing a few classes.

I'm not saying you let a guy get away with whatever he wants, I fully understand Richt's policy & agree with it to an extent.

All I'm saying is, Richt shouldn't have any issues with the TE depth, either move Langham to TE or consider the lack of depth before you give Hask the boot.

That's how Richt is though...tight ship.

Really surprised the Langham move hasn't happened yet.
 
Doubt it's "minor stuff" that gets a player kicked off the team.
It was smoking weed & missing a few classes.

I'm not saying you let a guy get away with whatever he wants, I fully understand Richt's policy & agree with it to an extent.

All I'm saying is, Richt shouldn't have any issues with the TE depth, either move Langham to TE or consider the lack of depth before you give Hask the boot.

That's how Richt is though...tight ship.

Really surprised the Langham move hasn't happened yet.

What's really the difference though. Most of the time Njoku was in the slot as opposed to inline. There's no way Langham can hold up as an inline tightend so what's really the difference what you call his position.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top