Oh no. Consenting adults indulging their biological instincts. Must fire him!
This world is a joke.
The big sticking point here is that as a general rule this behavior falls under a fraternization policy implemented (and written into contracts) at every level of colleges/universities ( and of course business's).Oh no. Consenting adults indulging their biological instincts. Must fire him!
This world is a joke.
Title IX makes Coeds a protected class of sorts as well.The big sticking point here is that as a general rule this behavior falls under a fraternization policy implemented (and written into contracts) at every level of colleges/universities ( and of course business's).
There is no way he can claim ignorance on this point.
Clarification, if the Coed identified as Lama would Title IX still provide protections in this case?Title IX makes Coeds a protected class of sorts as well.
I loved him in Spiderman.Have you seen his wife?
![]()
No but looks like I've seen his husband tf is this.Have you seen his wife?
![]()
I don’t care what age you are, if a hot 19 year old wants you and you turn her away because according to you it’s “pedo adjacent”, then let’s just be honest and call it what it is. You like the pole.....Why should they employ and pay millions to someone in leadership running around with burner phones trying to **** employees who are a **** hair away from being minors? Dudes in their 60's trying to **** 19 year olds is pedo adjacent. Weird flex trying to defend that.
And who forced him to marry her?Have you seen his wife?
![]()
Theres a distinct difference between happenstance and abusing your position of power over staff.I don’t care what age you are, if a hot 19 year old wants you and you turn her away because according to you it’s “pedo adjacent”, then let’s just be honest and call it what it is. You like the pole.....
That is fine, I get that, but your reasoning of pedo adjacent was straight up garbage. You’re better than that!Theres a distinct difference between happenstance and abusing your position of power over staff.
So you think a good looking 19 year old would "want" him if she met him in a bar? lolI don’t care what age you are, if a hot 19 year old wants you and you turn her away because according to you it’s “pedo adjacent”, then let’s just be honest and call it what it is. You like the pole.....
That’s not what I was calling out. That’s a whole other conversation. I was simply calling out the pedo comment.So you think a good looking 19 year old would "want" him if she met him in a bar? lol