forums

Clear this up or confirm it for me.

DuffleBagYoda

DuffleBagYoda

TBayCane RELOADED
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
2,013
So Al ran a "B1G" defense that works "Better" with and against lesser athletes, in a conference largely filled with power teams and inclement weather.

But everyone is lobbying for a B1G Defensive coordinator who looks good against those same teams with "lesser" athletes, who play mostly power offense in inclement weather?

And whenever this Defense is matched up against more innovative offense or above average athletes it isnt as **** or effective.

One could therefore deduce that said Defense and it's gaudy stats are a product of it's level of competition.

One could also note that even the "worst" (Al Groh/Golden) on field defenses, (schematically and statistically), have philosophical elements that, on paper, make great and perfect sense. But due to new offensive philosophies, rule changes and other circumstances are rendered either obsolete or ineffective. The same goes for "great" schemes, ask one Lovie Smith.

So the remaining questions in one's mind are this, "Why him (Aranda), why here, why now?" Which leads to the BIG follow up question. "His numbers,success,defensive savvy aren't new or secret, why hasn't ANYONE hired him away as a HC or DC?"

I just don't believe he is a fit for Miami POST Golden. I believe we need someone who has had success and understands running a system in line with what the HC has suggested he envisions and also calling games in that type of system.
 
Advertisement
tbaycane said:
So Al ran a "B1G" defense that works "Better" with and against lesser athletes, in a conference largely filled with power teams and inclement weather.

But everyone is lobbying for a B1G Defensive coordinator who looks good against those same teams with "lesser" athletes, who play mostly power offense in inclement weather?

And whenever this Defense is matched up against more innovative offense or above average athletes it isnt as **** or effective.

One could therefore deduce that said Defense and it's gaudy stats are a product of it's level of competition.

One could also note that even the "worst" (Al Groh/Golden) on field defenses, (schematically and statistically), have philosophical elements that, on paper, make great and perfect sense. But due to new offensive philosophies, rule changes and other circumstances are rendered either obsolete or ineffective. The same goes for "great" schemes, ask one Lovie Smith.

So the remaining questions in one's mind are this, "Why him (Aranda), why here, why now?" Which leads to the BIG follow up question. "His numbers,success,defensive savvy aren't new or secret, why hasn't ANYONE hired him away as a HC or DC?"

I just don't believe he is a fit for Miami POST Golden. I believe we need someone who has had success and understands running a system in line with what the HC has suggested he envisions and also calling games in that type of system.
Click to expand...

Word. USC plays in the big 10. The QB play sucks in the B1G too. Booty dudes like Cody Kessler are nothing to write home about.

This Anti-Aranda movement is really getting annoying.
 
Do some research into aranda's scheme. His defenses are built on pressure while protecting against big plays.

Go Games
 
jerzeycane said:
tbaycane said:
So Al ran a "B1G" defense that works "Better" with and against lesser athletes, in a conference largely filled with power teams and inclement weather.

But everyone is lobbying for a B1G Defensive coordinator who looks good against those same teams with "lesser" athletes, who play mostly power offense in inclement weather?

And whenever this Defense is matched up against more innovative offense or above average athletes it isnt as **** or effective.

One could therefore deduce that said Defense and it's gaudy stats are a product of it's level of competition.

One could also note that even the "worst" (Al Groh/Golden) on field defenses, (schematically and statistically), have philosophical elements that, on paper, make great and perfect sense. But due to new offensive philosophies, rule changes and other circumstances are rendered either obsolete or ineffective. The same goes for "great" schemes, ask one Lovie Smith.

So the remaining questions in one's mind are this, "Why him (Aranda), why here, why now?" Which leads to the BIG follow up question. "His numbers,success,defensive savvy aren't new or secret, why hasn't ANYONE hired him away as a HC or DC?"

I just don't believe he is a fit for Miami POST Golden. I believe we need someone who has had success and understands running a system in line with what the HC has suggested he envisions and also calling games in that type of system.
Click to expand...

Word. USC plays in the big 10. The QB play sucks in the B1G too. Booty dudes like Cody Kessler are nothing to write home about.

This Anti-Aranda movement is really getting annoying.
Click to expand...

People hear "3-4" and are in immediate fear because of what golden ran. Which is ludicrous because if it is an attacking 3-4 it is two totally different defenses.
 
tbaycane said:
I don't care about the 34 because ON PAPER i understand it's advantages. I've played in both. I think the B1G offenses are the reason for his success.

He didn't GET the usc job so.... Now what... Suck in lumberjack country
Click to expand...

And Butch's success with the 4-3 came against the Big Least.

What's your point?
 
Advertisement
AL ran a read and react defense. Aranda is all about confusing the o line and bringing pressure while creating one on one matchups. Quite a big difference.


What a hilarious thread. You're blaming the guy for coaching in the big ten.. When it's better than the Acc and head and shoulders above the coastal.

Goldens defense wasn't a failure becuase it's "meant for slower players", it was a failure because we got absolutely no pressure to the quarterback. If we did his tenure would have been very different here. Nothing about Aranda screams out slow big ten, if anything they would have to be fast in order for the d lineman and backers to rush the way they do.

Also Wisconsin didn't look slow against usc last night. Aranda is elite his defense speaks for itself. I just don't think he comes here because I haven't heard anything legitimate about it even being an option. He also interviewed for the green Bay Packers job earlier this year so he may be trying to go NFL
 
Last edited:
tbaycane said:
So Al ran a "B1G" defense that works "Better" with and against lesser athletes, in a conference largely filled with power teams and inclement weather.

But everyone is lobbying for a B1G Defensive coordinator who looks good against those same teams with "lesser" athletes, who play mostly power offense in inclement weather?

And whenever this Defense is matched up against more innovative offense or above average athletes it isnt as **** or effective.

One could therefore deduce that said Defense and it's gaudy stats are a product of it's level of competition.

One could also note that even the "worst" (Al Groh/Golden) on field defenses, (schematically and statistically), have philosophical elements that, on paper, make great and perfect sense. But due to new offensive philosophies, rule changes and other circumstances are rendered either obsolete or ineffective. The same goes for "great" schemes, ask one Lovie Smith.

So the remaining questions in one's mind are this, "Why him (Aranda), why here, why now?" Which leads to the BIG follow up question. "His numbers,success,defensive savvy aren't new or secret, why hasn't ANYONE hired him away as a HC or DC?"

I just don't believe he is a fit for Miami POST Golden. I believe we need someone who has had success and understands running a system in line with what the HC has suggested he envisions and also calling games in that type of system.
Click to expand...

Wow!
 
Spread offenses are designed to dictate numbers in the box and get linebackers off the field... So all the. Exotic looking LB blitzes kinda lose punch. As opposed being able to keep your front intact with 4 ...
 
tbaycane said:
Spread offenses are designed to dictate numbers in the box and get linebackers off the field... So all the. Exotic looking LB blitzes kinda lose punch. As opposed being able to keep your front intact with 4 ...
Click to expand...

3-4 defenses have a nickel and dime also.
 
Advertisement
tbaycane said:
Spread offenses are designed to dictate numbers in the box and get linebackers off the field... So all the. Exotic looking LB blitzes kinda lose punch. As opposed being able to keep your front intact with 4 ...
Click to expand...

Gary Patterson plays an odd front
 
I understand they have a nickel... But the point i was trying to make was once the box thins out and WRs come on the field, the jumble and confusion of where the extra rusher comes from is negated. And then you're back to who can beat their man.
 
Back
Top