- Joined
- Aug 11, 2015
- Messages
- 12,404
It is.Is a dedicated QB coach on the table? Or is everything going to remain status quo while Dawson is here?
It is.Is a dedicated QB coach on the table? Or is everything going to remain status quo while Dawson is here?
It's possible. Don't think so though. **** be third round or so I'd imagine. It's probably time he moves on. The main thing agents try to pitch for someone like him isnt draft position. It's his game being solid enough to get a decent first contract where he's at so he can position himself for a big 2nd contract. Longer he stays here the more he diminishes that opportunity because the physical positions in particular have a shelf life on how long they'll be able to play let alone be difference makers.
So has Nickel shown anything for the staff to believe he’s a legit option? Or are you just speaking that because it’s what you would hope to be the case for program trajectory?Luke Nickle & it's not even close. At some point we're gonna have to show TOP TIER HIGH SCHOOL QBS were capable of developing them and were a logical choice for them because we will play them. I like Nickles game but more importantly it's a timing thing. We will be breaking in a lot of new starters next year on both sides of the ball. Let them play and develop together. If we keep going for a quick one year option at QB from the portal every year we might as well make the decision moving forward not to bother wasting time and resources on recruiting high school QBs. I understand the logic obviously in taking a PROVEN portal QB. But when so many other prices are also gonna be in transition then it's an opportunity to prove what we're capable of. I'd play nickle and water down the playbook to limit his risks. No different from what Ohio State has done with sayin or Oregon with moore or bama with simpson or georgia with their QB. The schools that take this serious look for stability and multiple years out of essentially the most important player on the field. Can't do that if it's a new one every year. As I've said all along about the portal. When you're a school that recruits and develops their recruits than the portal is something you go to simply to fill in the blanks. It's about finishing touches on what is already a built roster. Not a base to what you're doing. Gonna be bumps in the road but that's how you develop culture and build a machine. We can't constantly process what we are then don't have our actions back up our words.
My concern with Bailey is the mental side of the game.
Based on everything we know, both Ward and Beck excelled in that area.
I know Bailey has the physical tools, but can he decipher coverages and pressures pre-snap? I have my doubts.
Not sure who told you that. Last season devin brown was chip Kelly's personal project. I have a friend on that staff and it's widely known if chip kelly would have stayed sayin was jumping back in the portal. His game would never belong in a chip kelly offense. All the same I get what you're saying. Simply disagree. #1 to a fan dropping down to 8 wins is horrible. To a football team getting to 8 wins while having upward trajectory in developing our own recruits can go a long way towards the teams future. Think us in 99 because our 97 & 98 classes had the opportunity to mesh. We built the best college football team ever as a result of 99 in particular and 2000. Sacrifice is necessary for progress. The alternative is spend 2 to 4 million on a QB while also having to spend on your oline, your dline, definitely your lbs & possibly another te. Too much is in transition next year to think spending on another quick fix at QB is a solid answer. I'm fine with taking another QB as long as it's someone who will be here for multiple years. Otherwise I'll pass and simply develop nickle and coleman.I get what you saying but this program isn’t at a point yet where they can take that kind of risk. Also I don’t think this is a situation where nickel has showed he is the future like sayin did last year at osu. We can’t afford to drop back down to 8 wins right now
Stop with the CJ Bailey needs to "come home"
The standard at Miami has changed. We are a CFP program that has won 20 games over the last two season with elite QB play. The standard does not get reduced because someone is a hometown kid.
At this moment, CJ is not one of the nations premier QB talents and needs to work on his game elsewhere.
Trajectory more than anything. Nickle showed us plenty in off-season when we had time and opportunity to give him reps. In season that's not in the third string QBs cards with no dedicated QB coachSo has Nickel shown anything for the staff to believe he’s a legit option? Or are you just speaking that because it’s what you would hope to be the case for program trajectory?
Someone finally understands what's taking place. Even if we retool through the portal it's all the same.I think Moten is gone
Miami is retooling on both sides of the line so it will be interesting next year
That wasn’t the only problem. He isn’t that good.Because his team was outmatched. What can a qb do if he doesn’t have time or his guys can’t get open?
Who? Leavitt is definitely not a better passer. Sorsby isn't better. Kid from Pitt isn't better. Where's the Cam Ward this year?Miami can and will do better than CJ Bailey
Well that’s encouraging, maybe bring in a vet through the portal and let that guy battle with Nickel? Is that a possibility?Trajectory more than anything. Nickle showed us plenty in off-season when we had time and opportunity to give him reps. In season that's not in the third string QBs cards with no dedicated QB coach
People must not remember how bad Joe burrow was before he got talent around him ! You can see who don’t really know football on this chat
I’ve said this forever.If you don’t show these young QB’s that they’re just going to sit for 3-4 years watching rentals then why should they even consider us.Luke Nickle & it's not even close. At some point we're gonna have to show TOP TIER HIGH SCHOOL QBS were capable of developing them and were a logical choice for them because we will play them. I like Nickles game but more importantly it's a timing thing. We will be breaking in a lot of new starters next year on both sides of the ball. Let them play and develop together. If we keep going for a quick one year option at QB from the portal every year we might as well make the decision moving forward not to bother wasting time and resources on recruiting high school QBs. I understand the logic obviously in taking a PROVEN portal QB. But when so many other prices are also gonna be in transition then it's an opportunity to prove what we're capable of. I'd play nickle and water down the playbook to limit his risks. No different from what Ohio State has done with sayin or Oregon with moore or bama with simpson or georgia with their QB. The schools that take this serious look for stability and multiple years out of essentially the most important player on the field. Can't do that if it's a new one every year. As I've said all along about the portal. When you're a school that recruits and develops their recruits than the portal is something you go to simply to fill in the blanks. It's about finishing touches on what is already a built roster. Not a base to what you're doing. Gonna be bumps in the road but that's how you develop culture and build a machine. We can't constantly process what we are then don't have our actions back up our words.
How about you stfu. I didn't say it was a problem.. I said I don't like relying on it. How many teams took qb's out of the portal and didn't make the playoffs? We've been lucky and we paid big $$ and we're still at 500 making the playoffs with a portal qb. How's the portal qb thing working out for fsu? We got lucky to pull two qb's back from the NFL.. otherwise we were ****ed running Poff out there. Don't forget how many we actually missed on that went to other teams.