“Lost all respect…not knowing what he’s talking about” as it applies to evaluating players is a bit strong. All of us - myself included - have thought and/or proclaimed certain players to be something they turn out not to be. I thought Lorenzo Lingard was going to be a stud. I thought Josh Allen was going to be the next JP Losman. I don’t have a podcast and website, so I don’t get blasted for those takes. I also thought Cici, Bain and Samson would be studs. I’m not a member of the D$lurp Club either.
People overcomplicate it. Three of the best four (or so) QBs of the past 20 years - Manning, Brady and Brees - are pretty average in terms of athleticism.
Athletics traits are great, but you have to be able to process information at an exceptionally high level to be a top QB. The problem with most evaluations is that people want to try to find the next Lamar/Josh Allen and overvalue athleticism and “arm talent”.
In fairness, it’s really hard to project how a kids ability to process information will progress, so it is understandable that we fixate on athletic traits. But if we were to prioritize what’s between the ears on some of these guys, we’d see a whole lot less Anthony Richardson’s going 4th overall.
It’s wild to me that people have Manning rated ahead of Chambliss. Be honest, who would you rather have to stop in a 2 minute drill with the game on the line?
Bottom line is, we make QB evals harder than they need to be