CFP Committee Rigging the System Almost Complete

it doesnt even matter if we had commissioners in the b12 and acc to step up. SEC and b10 could just say theyre doing their own playoff and itll take away the large portion of the tv money/viewership/ratings with them.

you either get into one of the big 2 or just go unbeaten
I've been hoping they do just that. I think there will be plenty of non-B1G and non-SEC school fans, like myself, who won't watch a playoff their school has no chance of playing in.
 
Advertisement
Conference expansion has done far more to kill the sport than NIL and the transfer portal combined.

First they put so many teams in each conference that nobody plays the same opponents in conference. One team can literally play the top 8 teams and another can play the bottom 8. At least when the ACC had divisions, everyone in the division played each other. You didn’t lose a shot at the conference championship game because you had to play tougher teams than the guy who gets a shot.

Now they’re expanding conference schedules to nine games which means SEC schools can just drop any non-conference game they have a shot at losing. They get over rewarded for conference wins so what’s the point in scheduling a good non conference opponent when you can just get three cupcake games and make the playoffs based on your perceived conference strength.

ACC/Big XII teams have no shot because their conference wins get ignored and the SEC won’t schedule against you in a non conference game so you have no chance get a “good win” in the eye of the committee.

As long as the committee values SEC wins and ignores SEC losses, there’s no reason for an SEC team to play anyone else.
At this point they should all play a semi-final and finals game for each conference.
 


With this comment, Mack Rhoades inadvertently explains how they have rigged the CFP for the SEC. “Strength of outta conference schedule” but then they allot 6 CFP slots to the SEC and also starting next year, they are making it mandatory that teams play 9 in conference games.

They have created a closed loop. They weigh SEC games more heavily than other conferences. SEC has no incentive to accept tough out of conference opponent. Teams out of the SEC conference lose the "strength of outta conference schedule" argument. There will be SEC teams with 3 or 4 losses getting in ahead of 1 or 2 loss ACC/Big12 schools.

Do the ACC and Big 12 even have living, breathing commissioners at this point?

Yes, we have known this for quite some time now.
 
Everything is rigged under the guise of sport. It’s entertainment in bed with gambling. It’s all about $$$ and what will bring in more action and revenue.


Who would have thought that the ONE INDUSTRY that the government would give a **** about regulating and prosecuting would be the gambling industry?

Gotta protect those suckers who think this **** is actually fair and not-rigged...
 
I absolutely hate saying this but FSU beat Bama. So that statement of his is already wrong.

Miami also happened to beat the same Florida team that beat Texas and Texas is ranked ahead of Miami.

It. makes. zero. sense. bring. back. the. computers.

I agree on the computers. I loathe the payoff committee.
 
Advertisement
This.

The SEC is still talked about as if it’s sui generis when A&M’s best WR is a NC State transfer lol. Hard to beat the phantoms of illusions perceived by so many folks.
Props for using sui generis, I had to look it up as my brain is sous vide.
 
It's not like both haven't screwed us over from the very beginning.
I think I would rather get screwed by the computer. At least the code could be reviewed to see if bias was inflected in any of the variables. With the committee, you know there are voters who straight up hate Miami and will use that to their favor and will never have to publicly expose those thoughts.
 
Conference expansion has done far more to kill the sport than NIL and the transfer portal combined.

First they put so many teams in each conference that nobody plays the same opponents in conference. One team can literally play the top 8 teams and another can play the bottom 8. At least when the ACC had divisions, everyone in the division played each other. You didn’t lose a shot at the conference championship game because you had to play tougher teams than the guy who gets a shot.

Now they’re expanding conference schedules to nine games which means SEC schools can just drop any non-conference game they have a shot at losing. They get over rewarded for conference wins so what’s the point in scheduling a good non conference opponent when you can just get three cupcake games and make the playoffs based on your perceived conference strength.

ACC/Big XII teams have no shot because their conference wins get ignored and the SEC won’t schedule against you in a non conference game so you have no chance get a “good win” in the eye of the committee.

As long as the committee values SEC wins and ignores SEC losses, there’s no reason for an SEC team to play anyone else.
That first sentence was tough. I had to read it twice. You're right. Sad part is that NIL/Portal is like skin cancer while the $EC crap is like stage 4 lung cancer. Both are bad, but one will kill you quicker. I have to imagine there must be some sort of legal maneuvering that will have to take place in order for any real change to happen. I gotta be honest, the more this crap continues, the more I feel myself feeling repelled by college football....but I'm like a crackhead who loves dysfunctional relationships when it comes to this isht.
 
IMG_1249.png


Hey ESPN/playoff committee, it’s probably smart to have a convo with the refs if you don’t want a playoff game or two featuring the ACC to tank viewership. Miami has double the viewership of GT and 6 times more viewership than the rest competing for the playoff (UVA/UL/Pitt)
 
Dude told no lies. The ACC sucks because ACC leadership sucks. Its a conference run by lawyers.

I've noted for decades now that the ACC referees will regularly direct the outcome of certain games with the intent of maximizing total conference bowl revenue. I.e.: If an 8-3 team is playing a 5-6 team in the final week of the season, the ACC referees will make sure the 5-6 team wins that game in order to get the ACC another bowl eligible team.
 
Advertisement


With this comment, Mack Rhoades inadvertently explains how they have rigged the CFP for the SEC. “Strength of outta conference schedule” but then they allot 6 CFP slots to the SEC and also starting next year, they are making it mandatory that teams play 9 in conference games.

They have created a closed loop. They weigh SEC games more heavily than other conferences. SEC has no incentive to accept tough out of conference opponent. Teams out of the SEC conference lose the "strength of outta conference schedule" argument. There will be SEC teams with 3 or 4 losses getting in ahead of 1 or 2 loss ACC/Big12 schools.

Do the ACC and Big 12 even have living, breathing commissioners at this point?

ACC commissioner is with Dan
The Shawshank Redemption Film GIF
 


With this comment, Mack Rhoades inadvertently explains how they have rigged the CFP for the SEC. “Strength of outta conference schedule” but then they allot 6 CFP slots to the SEC and also starting next year, they are making it mandatory that teams play 9 in conference games.

They have created a closed loop. They weigh SEC games more heavily than other conferences. SEC has no incentive to accept tough out of conference opponent. Teams out of the SEC conference lose the "strength of outta conference schedule" argument. There will be SEC teams with 3 or 4 losses getting in ahead of 1 or 2 loss ACC/Big12 schools.

Do the ACC and Big 12 even have living, breathing commissioners at this point?

I am not even sure why so many people lose sleep over this discussion.

If you have ever heard the statement 'follow the money', than you should already understand why this is the case.
 
Conference expansion has done far more to kill the sport than NIL and the transfer portal combined.

First they put so many teams in each conference that nobody plays the same opponents in conference. One team can literally play the top 8 teams and another can play the bottom 8. At least when the ACC had divisions, everyone in the division played each other. You didn’t lose a shot at the conference championship game because you had to play tougher teams than the guy who gets a shot.

Now they’re expanding conference schedules to nine games which means SEC schools can just drop any non-conference game they have a shot at losing. They get over rewarded for conference wins so what’s the point in scheduling a good non conference opponent when you can just get three cupcake games and make the playoffs based on your perceived conference strength.

ACC/Big XII teams have no shot because their conference wins get ignored and the SEC won’t schedule against you in a non conference game so you have no chance get a “good win” in the eye of the committee.

As long as the committee values SEC wins and ignores SEC losses, there’s no reason for an SEC team to play anyone else.
More confirmation the biggest issue for Miami is not the HC, the OC, or the QB.

The more pressing issue is leaving the ACC for either the $EC or more likely the B1G. The two conferences are working, successfully, to dominate the CFB market.
  • Highest TV rights revenues? Check
  • Automatic qualifiers for the 12-team CFP? 4 EACH? Check (at least seriously discussed).
  • Successfully recruiting most of the 5* players? Check (something like 45 or so of the top 50 last cycle?)
  • Cancelling OOC games in favor of a 9-game conference schedule? Check. Might end up $EC-B1G OOC only, with FCS home game layups.
Any team not in the $EC or B1G is on the outside looking in.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top