- Joined
- Jul 19, 2016
- Messages
- 1,140
Wasn’t sure where to post this but what a beautiful card
We won't be the number one offense, we won't have as many yards per game, points, first downs, explosive plays, and our avg yards per play will go down but it will be efficienter!Last year’s offense was historically “efficient”. Not just at Miami but all of college football. If we’re anywhere near that efficient again, we’re winning the ACC and probably the national championship.
And would you say we had a ton of productivity (the most even) out of our offense last year? As far as wasted effort, how would that be qualified in football? Is yards per play is a good indication of how efficient the offense is?I know it's not cool, but I think this is where a dictionary may come in helpful.
ef·fi·cient
/əˈfiSHənt/
adjective
- (especially of a system or machine) achieving maximum productivity with minimum wasted effort or expense.
Again, leading in stats doesn’t always mean you're being efficient—it might mean you're being more aggressive in the passing game or relying on explosive plays. With the improved defense (speaking it into existence), our offensive philosophy will be a lot different this season. Yes, we most likely won't be passing a million times a game so from a statistical standpoint there will be a dropoff- but we’ll be more balanced, control the tempo better and take teams out of the game with our physical run game and oline play.We won't be the number one offense, we won't have as many yards per game, points, first downs, explosive plays, and our avg yards per play will go down but it will be efficienter!
Maybe even efficienter-er!
BECAUSE OLINE BETTER
What is so hard to comprehend about that????
YesAnd would you say we had a ton of productivity (the most even) out of our offense last year? As far as wasted effort, how would that be qualified in football? Is yards per play is a good indication of how efficient the offense is?
Team Passing EfficiencyAgain, leading in stats doesn’t always mean you're being efficient—
| 1 | 13 | 434 | 295 | 7 | 4561 | 31 | 176.60 | |
| 2 | 13 | 361 | 246 | 6 | 3397 | 33 | 174.03 | |
| 3 | 16 | 455 | 325 | 10 | 4208 | 37 | 171.55 | |
| 4 | 13 | 489 | 328 | 8 | 4527 | 41 | 169.24 |
| Name | G | Att | Yards | Avg. | TD | Att/G | Yards/G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Mexico | 12 | 456 | 3043 | 6.67 | 37 | 38.00 | 253.58 |
| 2 | Kansas State | 13 | 461 | 2801 | 6.08 | 21 | 35.46 | 215.46 |
| 3 | Boise State | 14 | 555 | 3365 | 6.06 | 43 | 39.64 | 240.36 |
| 4 | UCF | 12 | 516 | 2977 | 5.77 | 33 | 43.00 | 248.08 |
| 5 | South Alabama | 13 | 449 | 2583 | 5.75 | 32 | 34.54 | 198.69 |
| 6 | Miami (Florida) | 13 | 433 | 2456 | 5.67 | 30 | 33.31 | 188.92 |
What does this even mean?it might mean you're being more aggressive in the passing game
Relying on? Or creating?or relying on explosive plays.
| 10+ | 20+ | 30+ | 40+ | 50+ | 60+ | 70+ | 80+ | 90+ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name | G | Yards | Yards | Yards | Yards | Yards | Yards | Yards | Yards | Yards | |
| 1 | Penn State | 16 | 253 | 77 | 26 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Miami (Florida) | 13 | 249 | 99 | 38 | 21 | 12 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
With the improved defense (speaking it into existence), our offensive philosophy will be a lot different this season. Yes, we most likely won't be passing a million times a game so from a statistical standpoint there will be a dropoff- but we’ll be more balanced,
| Rank | Team | 2024 | Last 3 | Last 1 | Home | Away | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Jose St | 64.42% | 61.61% | 62.37% | 62.98% | 65.73% | 49.07% |
| 2 | Rice | 62.90% | 61.23% | 52.38% | 60.87% | 64.74% | 56.81% |
| 3 | Colorado | 60.64% | 63.25% | 58.70% | 59.35% | 61.73% | 59.68% |
| 4 | Hawai'i | 60.49% | 61.90% | 69.41% | 59.30% | 61.71% | 64.91% |
| 5 | USC | 60.13% | 59.26% | 56.34% | 56.87% | 62.85% | 57.81% |
| 6 | N Texas | 60.07% | 57.58% | 64.71% | 61.84% | 58.85% | 53.21% |
| 7 | Syracuse | 59.78% | 48.90% | 10.34% | 59.35% | 60.17% | 39.39% |
| 8 | LSU | 59.21% | 55.10% | 55.74% | 60.86% | 57.66% | 51.03% |
| 9 | Arizona | 58.82% | 58.94% | 55.00% | 55.72% | 62.46% | 55.52% |
| 10 | Maryland | 58.79% | 60.19% | 50.79% | 59.61% | 57.77% | 57.20% |
| 11 | Middle Tenn | 58.29% | 58.71% | 54.69% | 56.16% | 60.27% | 54.91% |
| 12 | Oklahoma St | 57.39% | 54.33% | 54.41% | 62.13% | 54.18% | 56.09% |
| 13 | UAB | 56.78% | 56.37% | 55.13% | 54.01% | 58.88% | 51.35% |
| 14 | Georgia St | 56.69% | 53.52% | 52.86% | 62.85% | 51.24% | 43.52% |
| 15 | TCU | 56.63% | 50.00% | 52.17% | 60.00% | 54.44% | 56.99% |
| 16 | Ball St | 56.43% | 60.09% | 66.23% | 56.46% | 56.42% | 41.28% |
| 17 | UCLA | 56.18% | 57.87% | 57.33% | 53.87% | 58.38% | 47.17% |
| 18 | Pittsburgh | 56.16% | 51.03% | 35.92% | 57.79% | 54.75% | 52.95% |
| 19 | Akron | 56.07% | 52.07% | 42.37% | 52.82% | 57.78% | 57.14% |
| 20 | Fresno St | 55.64% | 60.56% | 53.45% | 51.64% | 58.78% | 60.38% |
| 21 | Duke | 55.36% | 61.83% | 66.18% | 53.24% | 57.08% | 46.69% |
| 22 | Georgia | 55.31% | 55.34% | 55.38% | 55.56% | 55.15% | 47.72% |
| 23 | Miami | 54.70% | 51.66% | 45.83% | 55.01% | 54.47% | 50.79% |
control the tempo better and take teams out of the game with our physical run game and oline play.
| Name | G | Total Time | Time/G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Army | 14 | 485:11 | 34:39.36 |
| 2 | Air Force | 12 | 406:06 | 33:50.50 |
| 3 | Northern Illinois | 13 | 433:37 | 33:21.31 |
| 4 | Memphis | 13 | 432:00 | 33:13.85 |
| 5 | Oregon State | 12 | 397:51 | 33:09.25 |
| 6 | Syracuse | 13 | 429:46 | 33:03.54 |
| 7 | Missouri | 13 | 427:39 | 32:53.77 |
| 8 | Miami (Florida) | 13 | 425:18 | 32:42.92 |
Just because we led in every statistical category last year doesn’t mean we can’t be even more efficient in 2025, especially with a stronger offensive line, a more reliable run game, and hopefully a better defense. I don't understand how that is so hard for people to comprehend. No, we will likely not be putting up 44 points a game and will definitely not just be throwing the ball a million times a game
If our defense was even average last year, our offensive philosophy would have looked a lot different. The passing attack would have gotten us a quick lead (ex: 21-0 against Cuse), and then let Martinez/Fletcher wear them down
I wish I could hold that honorI had no idea you were actually Dannyboycane. I hope all is well.
Yes
And number of plays in a scoring drive,
| Rank | Team | 2024 | Last 3 | Last 1 | Home | Away | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas Tech | 79.9 | 80.7 | 72.0 | 79.5 | 80.3 | 74.3 |
| 2 | UTSA | 78.5 | 62.3 | 64.0 | 81.0 | 76.7 | 75.9 |
| 3 | E Michigan | 77.9 | 67.3 | 59.0 | 86.2 | 71.0 | 63.3 |
| 4 | Tulsa | 76.5 | 79.3 | 85.0 | 77.0 | 76.2 | 74.4 |
| 5 | Utah St | 75.6 | 76.7 | 80.0 | 79.2 | 72.7 | 75.5 |
| 6 | Pittsburgh | 75.1 | 81.0 | 103.0 | 69.5 | 80.7 | 60.1 |
| 7 | Maryland | 75.0 | 68.7 | 63.0 | 76.3 | 73.4 | 67.2 |
| 8 | S Florida | 74.8 | 79.3 | 71.0 | 76.2 | 73.7 | 82.1 |
| 9 | Syracuse | 74.6 | 60.7 | 29.0 | 72.2 | 77.0 | 65.2 |
| 9 | Tennessee | 74.6 | 72.7 | 74.0 | 76.7 | 72.5 | 71.4 |
| 11 | Clemson | 74.5 | 71.7 | 69.0 | 75.2 | 73.9 | 78.2 |
| 12 | Wake Forest | 74.4 | 70.3 | 78.0 | 76.7 | 71.6 | 69.8 |
| 13 | Memphis | 74.3 | 70.3 | 56.0 | 72.7 | 75.8 | 70.5 |
| 14 | Virginia | 74.1 | 72.7 | 73.0 | 75.0 | 73.3 | 74.2 |
| 15 | Texas St | 74.1 | 83.3 | 80.0 | 73.7 | 74.5 | 76.6 |
| 16 | Iowa St | 73.5 | 73.0 | 68.0 | 78.5 | 69.3 | 60.8 |
| 17 | Hawai'i | 73.4 | 77.0 | 85.0 | 74.2 | 72.6 | 68.2 |
| 18 | N Illinois | 73.3 | 77.7 | 81.0 | 75.2 | 72.0 | 64.3 |
| 19 | N Texas | 73.3 | 77.0 | 68.0 | 71.8 | 74.3 | 79.3 |
| 20 | Mississippi | 73.2 | 77.0 | 73.0 | 68.0 | 78.3 | 73.4 |
| 21 | Miami | 72.7 | 70.3 | 72.0 | 73.8 | 71.9 | 68.4 |
| Rank | Team | 2024 | Last 3 | Last 1 | Home | Away | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Miami | 0.591 | 0.573 | 0.569 | 0.626 | 0.565 | 0.440 |
I don't know about time used to score but time of possession (we were 8th overall), the data used above, and scoring offense you can get a good idea of how efficient last year's offense was.as well as time used to score
Ah man, this is pretty funny to read. This topic flew so far over your head lol- it's really what makes this board great. Just because I think it COULD (emphasis on this), doesn't mean it will. It's why they play the gamesTeam Passing Efficiency
Rank Team G P ATT P COMP INT P YARDS P TD PASS EFF
1 Ole Miss![]()
13 434 295 7 4561 31 176.60 2 Indiana![]()
13 361 246 6 3397 33 174.03 3 Ohio St.![]()
16 455 325 10 4208 37 171.55 4 Miami (FL)![]()
13 489 328 8 4527 41 169.24
2024 National Leaders Rushing Offense - All Games through 01/20/2025 - Sorted by AVG
Name G Att Yards Avg. TD Att/G Yards/G 1 New Mexico 12 456 3043 6.67 37 38.00 253.58 2 Kansas State 13 461 2801 6.08 21 35.46 215.46 3 Boise State 14 555 3365 6.06 43 39.64 240.36 4 UCF 12 516 2977 5.77 33 43.00 248.08 5 South Alabama 13 449 2583 5.75 32 34.54 198.69 6 Miami (Florida) 13 433 2456 5.67 30 33.31 188.92
What does this even mean?
Relying on? Or creating?
2024 National Leaders Long Scrimmage Plays - All Games through 01/20/2025
10+ 20+ 30+ 40+ 50+ 60+ 70+ 80+ 90+ Name G Yards Yards Yards Yards Yards Yards Yards Yards Yards 1 Penn State 16 253 77 26 14 6 1 1 0 0 2 Miami (Florida) 13 249 99 38 21 12 8 5 1 1
College FB Team Passing Play Percentage
Rank Team 2024 Last 3 Last 1 Home Away 2023 1 San Jose St 64.42% 61.61% 62.37% 62.98% 65.73% 49.07% 2 Rice 62.90% 61.23% 52.38% 60.87% 64.74% 56.81% 3 Colorado 60.64% 63.25% 58.70% 59.35% 61.73% 59.68% 4 Hawai'i 60.49% 61.90% 69.41% 59.30% 61.71% 64.91% 5 USC 60.13% 59.26% 56.34% 56.87% 62.85% 57.81% 6 N Texas 60.07% 57.58% 64.71% 61.84% 58.85% 53.21% 7 Syracuse 59.78% 48.90% 10.34% 59.35% 60.17% 39.39% 8 LSU 59.21% 55.10% 55.74% 60.86% 57.66% 51.03% 9 Arizona 58.82% 58.94% 55.00% 55.72% 62.46% 55.52% 10 Maryland 58.79% 60.19% 50.79% 59.61% 57.77% 57.20% 11 Middle Tenn 58.29% 58.71% 54.69% 56.16% 60.27% 54.91% 12 Oklahoma St 57.39% 54.33% 54.41% 62.13% 54.18% 56.09% 13 UAB 56.78% 56.37% 55.13% 54.01% 58.88% 51.35% 14 Georgia St 56.69% 53.52% 52.86% 62.85% 51.24% 43.52% 15 TCU 56.63% 50.00% 52.17% 60.00% 54.44% 56.99% 16 Ball St 56.43% 60.09% 66.23% 56.46% 56.42% 41.28% 17 UCLA 56.18% 57.87% 57.33% 53.87% 58.38% 47.17% 18 Pittsburgh 56.16% 51.03% 35.92% 57.79% 54.75% 52.95% 19 Akron 56.07% 52.07% 42.37% 52.82% 57.78% 57.14% 20 Fresno St 55.64% 60.56% 53.45% 51.64% 58.78% 60.38% 21 Duke 55.36% 61.83% 66.18% 53.24% 57.08% 46.69% 22 Georgia 55.31% 55.34% 55.38% 55.56% 55.15% 47.72% 23 Miami 54.70% 51.66% 45.83% 55.01% 54.47% 50.79%
2024 National Leaders Time Of Possession - All Games through 01/20/2025
Name G Total Time Time/G 1 Army 14 485:11 34:39.36 2 Air Force 12 406:06 33:50.50 3 Northern Illinois 13 433:37 33:21.31 4 Memphis 13 432:00 33:13.85 5 Oregon State 12 397:51 33:09.25 6 Syracuse 13 429:46 33:03.54 7 Missouri 13 427:39 32:53.77 8 Miami (Florida) 13 425:18 32:42.92
There is not a single metric in which we were inefficient on offense last year. To even think balance = efficiency is stupid and yet we were **** near 50-50. I don't think there is a single metric on offense from last year in which we were "inefficient" so to think "we will be more efficient and balanced" is about as dumb as any take on this website
Because there aren’t better players on this offense compared to last yearJust because we led in every statistical category last year doesn’t mean we can’t be even more efficient in 2025, especially with a stronger offensive line, a more reliable run game, and hopefully a better defense. I don't understand how that is so hard for people to comprehend. No, we will likely not be putting up 44 points a game and will definitely not just be throwing the ball a million times a game
If our defense was even average last year, our offensive philosophy would have looked a lot different. The passing attack would have gotten us a quick lead (ex: 21-0 against Cuse), and then let Martinez/Fletcher wear them down
Flew over my head?Ah man, this is pretty funny to read. This topic flew so far over your head lol. Just because I think it COULD (emphasis on this), doesn't mean it will. It's why they play the games
Flew over my head?
I'm not convinced you could point out which machines could fly in an aviation museum.
The concept is clearly flying over your head.Because there aren’t better players on this offense compared to last year
How is that so hard to comprehend?
Flew over my head?
I'm not convinced you could point out which machines could fly in an aviation museum.
View attachment 330878
It flew over your head bro
Efficient means gaining less yards, scoring less points, and taking longer in general to reach the goal
View attachment 330879
Notice how I agreed and said we most likely won't be averaging 42 points per game again- but it doesn't mean we can't be more efficient in other areas. God, some of you are brain-dead. I don't think it's that preposterous to say our running game puts up better numbers in 2025. Again, it's why they play the games.View attachment 330878
It flew over your head bro
Efficient means gaining less yards, scoring less points, and taking longer in general to reach the goal
View attachment 330879
What's the rattling noise I hear coming through my computer? Time to relaxinefficient
adjective
in·ef·fi·cient ˌi-nə-ˈfi-shənt
Synonyms of inefficient:
not efficient:
such as
a: wasteful of time or energy
inefficient operating procedures
b: incapable, incompetent
an inefficientworkerpoRster
Thank Merriam-Webster understanding our situation