forums

CanesInSight Podcast Q and A

Advertisement
I am interested in an evaluation concerning Feld versus his predecessor Feeley. We have the injury bug plaguing the program. I understand that there is a lot that goes into an injury; factors like health history predispositions (in the case of Restrepo), nutrition, physiological profile--even genetics. If you were to make a comparison between Feeley and Feld; or even against his peers nationally, how would you measure that? Is it the number of athletes on an IR report? Is it team-wide performance on muscle mass increase, BMI reduction, weight lifted by quantity reps? What portion of an athlete's overall health, readiness to play football, and propensity to avoid injury belongs to the player and how much would you attribute to the S&C coach? Does a change in practiSe, a change in coaching philosophy's (CMC wanting to go more muscle than brains) contribute to that in any way?

I'm asking this from the PoV that it seems we are seeing more injuries this year; or perhaps this sentiment has more visibility because the lack of depth and experience at those positions with which the injuries have occurred are being made more obvious--and exploited by our opponents.
 
Canestomp said:
I am interested in an evaluation concerning Feld versus his predecessor Feeley. We have the injury bug plaguing the program. I understand that there is a lot that goes into an injury; factors like health history predispositions (in the case of Restrepo), nutrition, physiological profile--even genetics. If you were to make a comparison between Feeley and Feld; or even against his peers nationally, how would you measure that? Is it the number of athletes on an IR report? Is it team-wide performance on muscle mass increase, BMI reduction, weight lifted by quantity reps? What portion of an athlete's overall health, readiness to play football, and propensity to avoid injury belongs to the player and how much would you attribute to the S&C coach? Does a change in practiSe, a change in coaching philosophy's (CMC wanting to go more muscle than brains) contribute to that in any way?

I'm asking this from the PoV that it seems we are seeing more injuries this year; or perhaps this sentiment has more visibility because the lack of depth and experience at those positions with which the injuries have occurred are being made more obvious--and exploited by our opponents.
Click to expand...
Well last year under Feeley we lost our QB, top 2 RB, our C and Guard for the season. Stevenson played banged up last year too, lost Keontra Smith for 3-4 games.
 
Advertisement
Mario seemed to double down on the offensive scheme yesterday.
How much of this is being hamstrung by having gattis on staff vs how much mario wants a boring ball control offense?
How big of an impact does our bad offensive system have on recruiting? I have to imagine the offensive skill players see the offense we are running and being extremely turned off by it.
 
dolemite79 said:
Mario seemed to double down on the offensive scheme yesterday.
How much of this is being hamstrung by having gattis on staff vs how much mario wants a boring ball control offense?
How big of an impact does our bad offensive system have on recruiting?
Click to expand...
This x1000
 
-Why isn't GB3 getting more snaps? I understand the default answer is whoever is in front of him is playing better now, but is he possibly being played out of his natural position? What about Al Blades? He was a corner up until this staff decided to move him to safety. Same questions.

-Al Blades mentioned that him and Avantae didn't "play the same position", but in the Kevin Steele interview yesterday he mentioned that in modern day football there is basically no difference in the FS and SS other than semantics. Thoughts?
 
Advertisement
D$ Andrew etc. have you ever thought of starting a paid forum? Either monthly or one time donations and use that money for NIL deals?
 
Back
Top