forums

Can we talk about what’s ACC/Refs beef with Miami

JD08 said:
I view it as two separate issues. Both of which harm us, but we're not scoring in the low 20's solely because of the refs.
Click to expand...
What hurts us, we play with no Tempo, so our drives take 5 and 6 minutes, as we lumber down the field, then we have some procedure call, and puff, we now settle for a FG or 4th down attempt. When we play with Tempo, SMU, was sucking wind, and players started cramping.
 
Advertisement
SinisterCane said:
All this is pointless if Mario is not gonna chew the referees *** out of the sideline
Click to expand...
not just mario...jo jo trader got tackled an acted like nothing happened...our dl get held and do nothing about it dont sell it nothing...the only one i saw do some complaining was marion when he clearly was held.

At this point i gave up on mario ever lighting up refs as he cant do two things simultaneously even though he isnt calling plays or rotating players or doing anything productive on a sideline save look scared.
 
YLCANE said:
If you destroy their asses in the first half like they could have and should have
It would have been a 45-10 game

They played like **** and deserve to lose
When will they LEARN their lesson and come
Ready to beat down these
****** teams?

Smu stinks
Miami should have ROLLED them
In their sleep
Click to expand...
its hard to destroy teams when philosophically the refs could keep a game close....a holding could be called on every play (i played ol). They would find ways to atlest keep others in the game when it comes to us vs acc schools we arent very like in conference because we really were brought in to be good for fsu and validate some tobacco road schools in football.

easy tell is ...the acc would make clemson whole team fist team all acc every year...no matter how good the individual actually played.
 
I have said it on here before, but I’ll repeat it.

The cheating by the refs will only stop when we get a HC that tells the head ref as soon as they start not calling blatant holding or PI on the other team and calling bullshyte penalties on us that he will pull the team from the field and forfeit the game, and then go through with it when they ignore him. Then you blast these ***ks after the game for the entire world to see, and you call out the corrupt media and establishment that turns a blind eye to it.

You gotta have balls in life and make a statement. The players will respect him for doing it, and it’ll be a huge scandal. If they continue to do it next game, you pull the team again.
 
It would seem that someone with a little time on their hands could put together a montage of all the bad/missed calls that has hurt us for each game. That might get more attention than the onesies twosies clip on X that every fan puts out and gets ignored by everyone but that team's fan base.

You could also do one for all the holds no called on Bain that would take up an hour.
 
Rellyrell said:
The first play should’ve been off setting penalties, giving us another crack, but this specific play was the correct call. It’s the same call we got last yr vs. UL w Ward that their fans complained about. As long the QB has control of the ball & his arm is going forward, even if the reason his arm is going forward due to the momentum hit from behind, they r going to get the benefit call.

This call is the new “gather step” that the NBA allows to justify traveling.
Click to expand...
NBA isn’t watchable cause that rule makes anyone score 50.
 
Advertisement
Advertisement
Rellyrell said:
The first play should’ve been off setting penalties, giving us another crack, but this specific play was the correct call. It’s the same call we got last yr vs. UL w Ward that their fans complained about. As long the QB has control of the ball & his arm is going forward, even if the reason his arm is going forward due to the momentum hit from behind, they r going to get the benefit call.

This call is the new “gather step” that the NBA allows to justify traveling.
Click to expand...
Except that is not what the rule says. It requires “intentional forward movement of the passer’s hand with the ball firmly in their control.” And because it was a fumble on the field, it had to be indisputable evidence to overturn.
 
Back
Top