Curious - why wouldn’t he have the trust of his teammates unless there was some indicator he deliberately sabotaged games? If my teammate was always betting that we’d win outright, I’d think “he’s got so much confidence in us winning that he’s putting his money on the line.” Now if I suspected he ever bet against us like taking the other team to cover, or even taking prop bets like number of TDs thrown in a quarter I’d want him off the team because he could changing plays to make sure he wins his prop bet. But honestly, if the situation was that a teammate always bet on us to win, I personally wouldn’t care. As Herm Edwards once said “YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME.” If he’s playing to win the game, the fact that he has money riding on it isn’t going to change the outcome.
Another way to look at - let’s say he a friendly rivalry with a player on the other team. instead of a sports book he bets the other player that the loser has to wear a dress and buy the winner a big steak dinner. It’s just friends breaking each others balls. Technically that bet is gambling. But if you were his teammate, would you distrust him because of the “bet”?
So with Sorsby, I be interested in knowing what he was betting. If he was just betting on his team to win, I wouldn’t have a problem with it.