forums

Blake Baker.

CFB_Hogan said:
Here is something for the cryptic people who like solving puzzles.

As of 6:35 am in Miami, T-Rob has not followed either Patke or Baker on Twitter and both are not following him.

🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
changing season 9 GIF by Curb Your Enthusiasm


Appreciate all the nuggets you and others been dropping lately. Makes it a lot easier to **** off at work. Hopefully someone will post pictures of U-Haul invoices from the Baker residence sooner than later.
 
Advertisement
CFB_Hogan said:
I am opposed to Patke staying but not as much as I am opposed to Baker.

Patke at least had Frierson play well. Nothing that Baker did worked at all.
Click to expand...
Agreed. I think a clean slate would be best on the defensive staff, and I have a hard time believing Manny couldn't find an upgrade over Patke. I'm really, really not on-board with keeping Baker in any capacity. Guess we'll find out sooner or later.
 
The population of “insiders” is growing at a rate greater rate than Tesla stock. Respectfully to the newest batch of “I read it on three sites, come to my own thesis and post it as my own content” please just stop. I know only four people on this site who know anything first hand and they’re not amongst them. When they actually spend time with the people they post about, and not just one person lmao, maybe that person could become number five. Please stop posting what you think, as what you know. It’s kind of funny, but more pathetic... You might be right, but that doesn’t make you in the know. We have enough of you with the guys like Ferman, Irvin’s and this weeks fool (can’t think of his name) from the herald. Stop just stop.
 
Last edited:
Boarcane said:
The population of “insiders” is growing at a rate greater rate than Tesla stock. Respectfully to the newest batch of “I read it on three sites, come to my own thesis and post it as my own content” please just stop. I know only four people on this site who know anything first hand and they’re not amongst them. When they actually spend time with the people they post about, and not just one person lmao, maybe that person could become number five. Please stop posting what you think, as what you know. It’s kind of funny, but more pathetic... You might be right, but that doesn’t make you in the know.
Click to expand...

👀 👀
 
Boarcane said:
The population of “insiders” is growing at a rate greater rate than Tesla stock. Respectfully to the newest batch of “I read it on three sites, come to my own thesis and post it as my own content” please just stop. I know only four people on this site who know anything first hand and they’re not amongst them. When they actually spend time with the people they post about, and not just one person lmao, maybe that person could become number five. Please stop posting what you think, as what you know. It’s kind of funny, but more pathetic... You might be right, but that doesn’t make you in the know. We have enough of you with the guys like Ferman, Irvin’s and this weeks fool (can’t think of his name) from the herald. Stop just stop.
Click to expand...
What do you mean I shouldnt assume the Partridge "brothers" (arent related) are coming because Coach Baez follows them on Twitter?

(i am kidding, pls dont take it serious)
 
CFB_Hogan said:
I am opposed to Patke staying but not as much as I am opposed to Baker.

Patke at least had Frierson play well. Nothing that Baker did worked at all.
Click to expand...
I'm torn on Patke as I think he is a solid coach; however, he is vastly overpaid given what he contributes. Cut ties and apply savings elsewhere.
 
TimeB0mb said:
Yeah 99-03, then Venables was solo from 04-2011. You think he was happy to share playcalling responsibilities again? Don't take my word for it. Heres what the local rag said at the time.

oklahoman.com

OU football: Brent Venables taking Clemson job

Oklahoma defensive coordinator Brent Venables confirmed that he has accepted a job as Clemson's new defensive coordinator.
oklahoman.com

"Bob and Mike Stoops were adamant in saying Venables, who arrived with the staff in 1999, would still remain a part of the play-calling plan. But it was difficult to consider Mike Stoops’ return anything but a demotion for Venables, who had run the defense since Mike Stoops left for Arizona in 2004."

The intent was to demote Venables. Stoops didn't need to fire him because Venables would either have to suck it up or leave.
Click to expand...
I was right. I corrected the guy who said he was fired. He wasn’t fired. I was also right that he was co-DC with Mike Poops before. And I was right that he left OU because he wanted to run the D at Clemson by himself.

Why are you arguing with me? I was right about everything I said as usual. If you want to start getting into Bob Poops’s intent from reading the words of some dopey blogger from ten years ago then go ahead. You’ll conjure up that goofy **** on your own.
 
Advertisement
Gables Cane said:
I'm torn on Patke as I think he is a solid coach; however, he is vastly overpaid given what he contributes. Cut ties and apply savings elsewhere.
Click to expand...
This isn’t about savings. It’s about getting rid of dead weight and replacing it with huge upgrades.

There’s no reason to have Patsy on this staff. He doesn’t recruit, and that’s what we need position coaches to do first and foremost. It’s the same reason Rump has to go.
 
Advertisement
fincane said:
Thats what I keep going back to. I don't see him working under Baker. Patke might go to special teams and stay there but would Robinson come take a job here even with all the money and being home to work under Baker? Don't see it.
Click to expand...
And can you have a position coaching making more than your dc? I think T-rob might have gotten more than baker and easily
 
Back
Top