I prefer another alignment and personnel grouping, but there were 2 obscenely poor tackles on that play. I don't want to blame the coaches for **** like that because then real gripes get watered down.
Looks nothing like the old defense to me. We have 5 guys on the line with a safety coming down. A 7th guy is peering into the backfield and cheating into the box. We have 9 guys within 5 yards of the los. They only have 5 blockers. This play should have been a 4-5 yard gain at best. We have 5 guys vs their 5 guys on the line so if anyone can make a 1-1 play it goes for a yard or two or no gain.
The old d would have had 4 guys at most on the line, possibly 3. LBS 7 yards of the ball and safeties out of view.
When you have your LBs that are suppose to be your 2nd line of defense against the run having to worry about crossing routes while spread completely off the line in space where they are obviously not comfortable, then you are asking for missed tackles and blown assignments.
If Miami had a Dline that can attack the line then maybe these weird alignments would work one day. But they cant attack and because of it Dalvin Cook never had to worry about a Dlineman touching him before getting to the LBs and DBs. Once that happens all he see is space and opportunity, still should have made the tackle but our defensive scheme is the worst i have ever seen in my life.
This is a little silly. You can make the argument that we should've been in nickel, but when they spread the field you have to account for their WR's...Do you guys want 10 guys in the box and no one on Rudolph, Greene, and Lane?
If carter is that far back, then it is worse than a excuse than only having 10 men on the field. The complete middle of the field is wide open, but that ain't coaching.
There were 4 msised tackles before he even crossed the 1st down marker. That was the issue. We had a guy hit him at the LOS, he failed to make a tackle.
Seriously, do you guys want the defense to disregard the 4 wideouts and play 10 in the box? The alignment is fine. The missing of 4 tackles is not.