I have on good authority that multiple trustees read this blog daily and are inclined to take advice on how to manage a large university athletic program from some random poster who has never been involved in athletic or university administration in any capacity.
You're the real hero.
I have on good authority that multiple trustees read this blog daily and are inclined to take advice on how to manage a large university athletic program from some random poster who has never been involved in athletic or university administration in any capacity.
You're the real hero.
No worries bro. The BOT is ready. Corch is gonna have a terrible day in a couple of weeks
I have on good authority that multiple trustees read this blog daily and are inclined to take advice on how to manage a large university athletic program from some random poster who has never been involved in athletic or university administration in any capacity.
You're the real hero.
You’re just figuring THAT out. They want a team that loses to Duke and UVA at the “Harvard of the South”! (53rd and dropping. Incompetence at its best.)I'd say that based on the last four hires - the BOT, the Administration, and the AD - don't know any more about football than tapeworms.
A 50% bad hire rate - still sucks.
But FOUR in a ROW?
That's called INTENTIONAL.
Don’t need experience running a university admin to know when a football program is in free fall.I have on good authority that multiple trustees read this blog daily and are inclined to take advice on how to manage a large university athletic program from some random poster who has never been involved in athletic or university administration in any capacity.
You're the real hero.
That ain’t the point.
I'd say that based on the last four hires - the BOT, the Administration, and the AD - don't know any more about football than tapeworms.
A 50% bad hire rate - still sucks.
But FOUR in a ROW?
That's called INTENTIONAL.
Serious question. Did you think Richt was an awful hire when we were 10-0 last year?
The administration was WAY behind the curve opening up the purse, but finally did. Considering our options at the time, Richt looked like a good hire. At least he made the right hire(s) on D. Now it doesn't look that way, but revisionist history won't change it.
They were intentionally cheap. That doesn't mean they intentionally made bad hires. No one on earth is going to pay someone and hope they fail.
This isn't Major League, Jobu.
Compare us to USC post-Carroll and it looks eerily similar. Except they have quite a bit more money than Miami.
They go for "safe." Not innovation. They do for low energy - not hungry but high energy. Truth is - they don't know a good coach when they see one - they just want to play it safe - and to **** with winning.