forums

AP ACC Breakout Players to Look Out For in 2018 - QB Malik Rosier

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted7012
  • Start date Start date
Advertisement
As to TBs wager,, I'm not a swami & cannot predict the future.
Malik has 1 chance in 4 of being the starter.
That being achieved, he has 1 chance in 2 of beating LSU.
1/4•1/2=1/8.
Simplistic? Yes.
Will he finish the season?
To my flawed logic, probably not.
Like to see a Jacory Harris senior season for Malik..
 
3GC said:
As to TBs wager,, I'm not a swami & cannot predict the future.
Malik has 1 chance in 4 of being the starter.
That being achieved, he has 1 chance in 2 of beating LSU.
1/4•1/2=1/8.
Simplistic? Yes.
Will he finish the season?
To my flawed logic, probably not.
Like to see a Jacory Harris senior season for Malik..
Click to expand...

I arrived at the same conclusion but for different reasons. The hope is that Richt does with Rosier what he did for Stafford.

Stafford 52.7% to 55.7% to 61.4%
Rosier 50.9% to 54% to ? (ignoring 2016 since he barely threw any passes)

If Rosier can improve 4.5% I think it means he can be a good enough qb to lead Miami to the playoffs (even though as one poster said, if the improvement just comes from hitting more two yard passes, it might not mean as much, I still think accuracy in short yardage will bear fruit).

Also, kudos for showing that grundle-licker LooseVagina what it means to have balls by being willing to make a guess as to how you think the qb situation might play out.
 
TimeB0mb said:
I arrived at the same conclusion but for different reasons. The hope is that Richt does with Rosier what he did for Stafford.

Stafford 52.7% to 55.7% to 61.4%
Rosier 50.9% to 54% to ? (ignoring 2016 since he barely threw any passes)

If Rosier can improve 4.5% I think it means he can be a good enough qb to lead Miami to the playoffs (even though as one poster said, if the improvement just comes from hitting more two yard passes, it might not mean as much, I still think accuracy in short yardage will bear fruit).

Also, kudos for showing that grundle-licker LooseVagina what it means to have balls by being willing to make a guess as to how you think the qb situation might play out.
Click to expand...
Hey, quick question. Did Trevor Knight lead Oklahoma to two consecutive 11 win seasons, or nah?
 
Loose Cannon said:
Hey, quick question. Did Trevor Knight lead Oklahoma to two consecutive 11 win seasons, or nah?
Click to expand...

No. He didn't. Was part of two 11 win teams. Was named starter in 2013 and 2014. In the first 11 win season he started several games and led Oklahoma to a huge upset over #3 Alabama. You also claimed Blake Bell was the starter in 2013. Knight was named the starter at the beginning of the season, was criticized for his inaccuracy (although higher completion percentage than Rosier), got injured, then didn't get job back until Bell got injured because Stoops said his offense depended on timing and he needed an accurate qb.

As a Rosier defender, it's actually worse for you. The QB who kept losing his job because of inaccuracy has a career completion percentage 4 points higher than Rosier.

So here is the thing, I have the balls to admit when I'm wrong. You don't have the balls to make a prediction about who will be the qb next season because you are scared to be wrong and don't have the sack to take the heat. Your fragile ego depends on your belief that board members will think someone who says "Richt will start the person he thinks gives him the best chance to win" is a pearl of wisdom.

You are a beta male who backs down in the face of a direct challenge. I'll put it to you directly again - I know I know more about football than you. Concede that point and we're done. I'm assuming you will dispute that contention. So the only way to establish who knows more is to make a prediction based on our knowledge of the game. This thread is about Rosier. So the question is whether he will be the starter at the end of the season. I said no, he doesn't have the accuracy to be successful. Your response thus far has been to evade the question by trying to get me to admit that I was wrong when I said Knight led two 11 win teams. Now that I've cleared that up, you don't have anything else to hide behind.

Since you have established to the board that you are a gutless pseudo intellectual and don't have the balls to make a prediction, I've sweetened the pot and offered $200. If your prediction on whether Rosier finishes the season is right, I'll pay you $100 and also donate $100 to a S FL kids charity. If I am right (and I will be) I'll still donate $100 to charity because I have no doubt you will be a pu$$y and disappear when it's time to pay up. So nut up, or shut up and continue being a beta b#tch who runs from a direct challenge. Rosier finishes next season as starting qb, yes or no.
 
Last edited:
TimeB0mb said:
I arrived at the same conclusion but for different reasons. The hope is that Richt does with Rosier what he did for Stafford.

Stafford 52.7% to 55.7% to 61.4%
Rosier 50.9% to 54% to ? (ignoring 2016 since he barely threw any passes)

If Rosier can improve 4.5% I think it means he can be a good enough qb to lead Miami to the playoffs (even though as one poster said, if the improvement just comes from hitting more two yard passes, it might not mean as much, I still think accuracy in short yardage will bear fruit).

Also, kudos for showing that grundle-licker LooseVagina what it means to have balls by being willing to make a guess as to how you think the qb situation might play out.
Click to expand...
With the playmakers we have on offense, i think.
A short passing game might be all we need.
All's lost without OL improvement..
 
TimeB0mb said:
No. He didn't. Was part of two 11 win teams. Was named starter in 2013 and 2014. In the first 11 win season he started several games and led Oklahoma to a huge upset over #3 Alabama. You also claimed Blake Bell was the starter in 2013. Knight was named the starter at the beginning of the season, was criticized for his inaccuracy (although higher completion percentage than Rosier), got injured, then didn't get job back until Bell got injured because Stoops said his offense depended on timing and he needed an accurate qb.

As a Rosier defender, it's actually worse for you. The QB who kept losing his job because of inaccuracy has a career completion percentage 4 points higher than Rosier.

So here is the thing, I have the balls to admit when I'm wrong. You don't have the balls to make a prediction about who will be the qb next season because you are scared to be wrong and don't have the sack to take the heat. Your fragile ego depends on your belief that board members will think someone who says "Richt will start the person he thinks gives him the best chance to win" is a pearl of wisdom.

You are a beta male who backs down in the face of a direct challenge. I'll put it to you directly again - I know I know more about football than you. Concede that point and we're done. I'm assuming you will dispute that contention. So the only way to establish who knows more is to make a prediction based on our knowledge of the game. This thread is about Rosier. So the question is whether he will be the starter at the end of the season. I said no, he doesn't have the accuracy to be successful. Your response thus far has been to evade the question by trying to get me to admit that I was wrong when I said Knight led two 11 win teams. Now that I've cleared that up, you don't have anything else to hide behind.

Since you have established to the board that you are a gutless pseudo intellectual and don't have the balls to make a prediction, I've sweetened the pot and offered $200. If your prediction on whether Rosier finishes the season is right, I'll pay you $100 and also donate $100 to a S FL kids charity. If I am right (and I will be) I'll still donate $100 to charity because I have no doubt you will be a pu$$y and disappear when it's time to pay up. So nut up, or shut up and continue being a beta b#tch who runs from a direct challenge. Rosier finishes next season as starting qb, yes or no.
Click to expand...
You don't KNOW ****. You're guessing, and you just admitted that your GUESS is based on incorrect information, and that makes you an idiot. You tried to draw a comparison between Trevor Knight getting passed over for Baker Mayfield and Malik Rosier getting passed up for someone else.

The problem is that you keep lying about why Knight was benched and trying to force fit it into your flawed understanding of QB accuracy. Knight wasn't benched because he was inaccurate. He was always inaccurate. He was inaccurate before he ever won the job. He got the job because he gave the Sooners the best chance to win games. He completed 39% against Akron and still started the next game. He was +50% in that West Virginia game as well when he got benched. He got benched because they were losing. You play whoever gives you the best chance to win the next game, and there's a lot more than just accuracy that factors into that. Now I know you read an article once that says anything below 58.5% isn't NFL material, but we're not talking about the NFL. We're talking about who gives us the best chance to win games, and I haven't seen enough from the other guys to make such a bold prediction. Is Malik a great QB? No. Is it possible we have someone better? Maybe. I don't know, and neither do you. I hope we have someone better than Malik was last season, but we **** sure ain't got a transfer with 8 games and 2300 yards passing under his belt on the bench. We have 3 guys who've never seen a live defense at the college level before. You don't know what they can do, and neither do I.
 
Advertisement
A walk down memory lane. Being right all the time is both a gift and a curse. Funny how Loose ****** and ****le Richt were white knighting Rosier but refused to take my bet that Rosier doesn't finish season.
 
3GC said:
Malik was recruited by the prior staff,,everyone wanted him out along with the memories of Golden.
Well, he's still here. Projected starter, best QB since Ken.
I think that's pretty kool..
Click to expand...
Bump... This one aged nicely.

:ibis-roflmao-sm3:
 
TimeB0mb said:
A walk down memory lane. Being right all the time is both a gift and a curse. Funny how Loose ****** and ****le Richt were white knighting Rosier but refused to take my bet that Rosier doesn't finish season.
Click to expand...

Both of them ran for the hills after battling all year with people about how Rosier was better than Kaaya. I am sure they are still around with different usernames.
 
KrazyCane said:
Malik Rosier got Miami to the ACCCG his first season as a starter and first season taking competing for the job seriously.

I think it’s smart to mention him as being a potential breakout player which would only mean good news for us.
Click to expand...
Yeah...Malweak and Mork broke
 
RBLCane said:
I see we have a lot of Malik fans here. I just don't see how he qualifies as a "breakout" player. If anything, he "broke out" and made a name for himself last year, even though he was far from outstanding. In 2018, I don't see him getting significantly better. He's a a senior. What can he possibly do that he hasn't done already to up his game?!?!

So the fact that he's even on this "breakout" list is highly questionable; there are tons of better candidates on this team who could have "breakout" seasons. And the two sentence endorsement he gets from the author is hilarious. The guy might not even start!
Click to expand...
RBL!
 
QoCane85 said:
Wrong!!! We don’t care about the bun! We care that he’s not that good at all to be mentioned as a breakout player! He sucked last year and his struggles throwing the football continue, specially that daunting bubble screen(throws to the feet of the receivers, overthrows etc).
Click to expand...
Spot on @QoCane85
 
TimeB0mb said:
You can win the lottery too if you play enough times. Doesn't mean it's a sound retirement strategy. Also, your example proved the point of the article. Dorsey was a terrible NFL qb. You offered up what is known as a statistical outlier.

Yes, it is possible for an inaccurate qb to win a college championship. It is also possible that the fact that Ken Dorsey was the qb for what is widely considered to be the most talented team in the history of college football might have played a tiny part in explaining how an inaccurate qb won a national title. You are getting emotional about your qbs instead of looking at the numbers. You can believe in your heart of hearts that Rosier is going to be the next Ken Dorsey and be the exception to the rule that accuracy is the greatest predictor of success; I'll trust the odds. You can take Rosier, I'll take the field.

I do happen to think that Rosier CAN be the qb on a winning team if he serves as a caretaker qb and doesn't turn the ball over, Miami dominates with the run game, and fields a smothering defense. I don't believe Miami has the OL to establish a power run game, which is why that plan will fail. A dynamic qb can overcome those deficiencies.

Bottom line: given that the 2017 version of Rosier was very nearly dead last in the ACC in accuracy, it shouldn't be hard for another qb on the roster to play better than Rosier. If there isn't a more accurate QB on the roster, then Richt failed at recruiting and developing qbs. Perry should have been a shoo-in to start this year. Sounds like he is in 3rd or 4th place. That is a massive miss by Richt if Perry turns out to be a flop.
Click to expand...
**** you good.
 
Advertisement
Loose Cannon said:
In 10 months Rosier went from backup 3rd baseman material to the all time Touchdown leader by a Miami QB, through 6 games he was on the Maxell watch list, and he was the starting QB for the Miami Hurricanes in an Orange Bowl since when? Man I’d give my left nut to be Malik Rosier last season.
Click to expand...
Glad you didnt make that offer this year guy. Ouch.
 
KrazyCane said:
Malik Rosier has shown that he has what it takes to win big games. Before last year he wasn’t even taking it seriously, so he definitely has potential to be even better than he was last season. Especially knowing the young guys will be called to replace him if he doesn’t continue to improve.
Click to expand...
But Mork Richt had a different plan.
 
Loose Cannon said:
If he was 54% against Pitt and Wisconsin we win them both and finish the season 12-1, which is better than Baker Mayfield did throwing for 70%. We don't need an NFL QB to win. We don't need 70% to win. Our team isn't built completely around having a high functioning QB. We simply need Rosier to not be a 44% guy in two games last season.
Click to expand...

be9.gif
 
Back
Top