Another Coaches Clinic Recap

If you noticed, Gattis was getting grass in front of his receiver in the MIDDLE OF THE FIELD. It literally won them the game.

I’ve been asking for this for years and Gattis does it very well. His route combinations put pressure on the line backers and gets guys open over the short middle for run after catch opportunities. The quarterback always has someone coming into his field of view for an easy throw.

Our previous coaches thought the only way to get receivers in space was to spam that sorry *** bubble screen. It is ok a few times a game, but it doesn’t replace good route design and rhythm.

The problem with this offense is he will face teams he can’t bully. After what they did to Ohio State, we are basically talking Georgia, Bama, and maybe Clemson.

Against those teams he needs to use 11 personnel more and get the slot on safeties and linebackers. The routes for everyone have to be shorter and faster except for the guy you got running a fly or fade. The quarterback’s drop has to be shortened too. Even three steps can take too long against the most elite teams.

I like this offense. If he somehow hooked up with Joe Brady or just studied his film, I would be overjoyed. The downfield shots will be there, especially when we have the run going.

X has been getting a ton of praise. I think our passing offense is going to be a bit different with more spread and 11 personnel. We can run the 12 stuff, but I think he likes the talent in the slot and wants to use it.
Just an opinion here but getting away from Harbaugh could open this offense up more than shown at Michigan. I've watched a bunch of their games over the past few years and there is always this random set of plays thrown into the mix of old school 22 personnel and similar. I can't help but think that is Jim getting in the stuff he wants to see.

I think Gattis is a bright guy and will tailor this offense to his personnel like any competent playcaller. We all know Mallory brings nothing in the run game so I can't expect to see him as an inline guy 40-50 plays a game getting his head kicked in. Arroyo is the guy I expect to see out there the most and I have a hard time believing we aren't in 20 or 11 alot based on the guys on this roster.
 
Advertisement
Yep. CUA Cardinals. It was a good time. By my Junior year in 07 we had a good team. In 08 we won a bowl game after blowing an easy playoff birth.
Got that pretty basilica too. Probably wasn't too much near you in terms of going out back then; it's still a bit secluded but Petworth has developed and Union Market is not too far. Where did you guys go out? H St?

1648582745331.webp
 
In my opinion, that's just hand to hand combat. Just like a boxer going to the midsection to get his opponent to lower his hands. Instead of fists it's forearms. It's a forearm shiver. Perfectly legal.

**** yeah.

It really bothered me the sorry game plan Lashlee came out with versus Bama.

If Iwas coaching that game, I would have had our best blocking tight end following 31 all game. The tackle engages him and the tight end bust him in the ribs EVERY PLAY. If he lines up inside, same thing with the guard and center.

I know it puts pressure on you numbers wise, but you can’t sit back and let one guy destroy you like that. Take their best player out of the game and try to survive. You let him just go ape **** on you, it’s over before the end of the first quarter.

Seeing this is the type mentality Mario and Mirabal have is exciting. We will be a much more physical football team if nothing else.
 
Context and qualifications:

I've been relatively dormant for some years. For those of you who don't know me: I played at a local high school in the early-mid 2000's, played D3 college ball, then came back to coach at my alma mater for some years before deciding to pursue a career in law. I was on a staff that took down some of the top teams in Dade and I spent most of my time coaching defensive backs and linebackers. I have been out of the game since 2013 mainly because this career (and the firm I was at) absolutely consumes your life. Upon hearing about the coaches' clinic, I reached out to some old colleagues and they were cool enough to let me tag along the group for the weekend. The comments below are based on my own observations and opinions, and feedback from my colleagues.

*excuse the stream of conscious nature of my notes--if I don't make sense, let me know and I will explain*
*I will do my best to not overlap some of the notes from other people--I haven't read anything factually different from my memory/notes*

Day 1:
- Aside from parking, the whole registration process and general organization was great. The IPF is above average, but the facility could use some upgrades--this is not a secret. Overall, though, it seemed sufficient to run a top tier program. The registration period served as a mixer.
- The staff is enormous; they were everywhere, coming from all angles to chat it up. Of note, Kevin Steele was super cool and welcoming. Mario was happy and talking to everyone--it was a great vibe. Once the speakers started, it seems like the staff partially retreated to their offices to get some work done.
-- Kevin Steele: He was my favorite speaker of the night. Really focused on mentality, philosophy, game planning and how to coach tackling. A whole post could be dedicated to his presentation.
-- Jahmile Addae: focused on Press Man coverage. He has a very nice blend of intensity, professionalism and detail orientation. He was able to clearly present exactly what he is expecting from the guys. I was able to watch the DB drills on Day 2 and you could tell his classroom teaching was translating to the field. He ran drills specifically tailored for each phase of the technique.
-- Josh Gattis: I had a caffeine headache, so I couldn't stay for his whole presentation--went to get some coffee. What I caught in the beginning was all I needed to hear, however. He and I are of the school of thought that whatever you run on offense (scheme and philosophy) has the most effect on what becomes of your defense's mentality. In other words, if you're a finesse offense, your defense will be soft. This is where you see his defensive background coming through. Btw, our offense is essentially a modern WingT. I know because I'm a WingT guy. Its more of what I expected from Lashlee (less the pace) than what we actually got from Lashlee, which was air raid.
-- Alex Mirabal: this dude gets me fired up. He's the same guy from when he was at FIU--but interestingly enough, his teaching points have changed. I don't want to throw him under the bus, but he had some cutting edge techniques that had me upset hearing as defensive guy.
-- Coach O: Dude was an absolute trip. Shared the story of him coming to Miami; explained the importance of learning more than just your position group, but also staying in your lane and only coaching your own position; talked about the kind of dedication needed to be great; went into some technique stuff too. He presentation was kinda everywhere (like him) but made sense in a circular kind of way.
-- Jimmy Johnson: This was a dream come true for me. The whole thing didn't seem real. He spent most of his time talking about leadership and the importance of having good players and elevating your players and staff. If you watched the NFL films documentary on Jimmy, then you got the gist of his share. The thing I got most out of his share is the importance of investing in your people and keeping them on a sliding scale based on their value to the organization.
- I couldn't stick around for the position group breakout sessions. I regret taking my wife out to dinner instead of this. Lesson learned.

Day 2:
- I got in at 7 to make sure I got enough coffee to make it through the day. Breakfast was sufficient--just the standard continental breakfast items. Enough food for everyone and more.
-- Coach Feld: buddy came in like a bat out of **** around 7:45 to get his presentation going. I came away impressed. He spoke briefly about building mental toughness and how they define each of its aspects. One quote I liked was "You start to love the things that are hard once you get good at them." He said this in the context of coaching kids who don't necessarily love football and don't always want to participate in its rigors. It kind of gives them hope that pushing through the tough times will be worth it.
- Feld took us into the weight room and allowed his staff to present their training philosophy. They listed a hierarchy of 7 movements: neck strength>core strength>loaded hip hinge>leg strength>press strength>hamstrings>pullups (this is my recollection--might be wrong). They were super welcoming and cool. I am going to reach out to them to get some more info.
-- Darren Rizzi: took us outside and ran us through what felt like 50 special teams drills in like 5 minutes. It all made sense and it was all very fast--it was remarkable. What I got out of it is to avoid 11 on 11 special teams drilling and teaching. You should break special teams up into multiple individual units and specialize your teaching. The whole staff should be very involved in this. No one takes a break during special teams practice.
-- Sean McVey: Importance of having good players; philosophical stuff about blending the run and pass. I can expand this later if requested. This post is already too long.

[Practice]:
- We got a copy of the practice schedule and I did my best to follow along. Seems like we were either on time or early with the period schedule.
- Again, we have a million coaches. They were all fired up and they were all engaged. The player/coach(staff) ratio is clearly better than ever.
- I was able to watch DB and LB individual periods about 60/40 percent, respectively.
- Coach Strong is TOUGH on the guys. Sheesh. The kids were responding well, however. Their effort during individual period was outstanding. If there was a whiff of a player cutting a rep short or making a mental mistake, they were hearing about it in an uncomfortable way.
- There are probably 3-5 guys that all look roughly the same to me. No one really stood out other than 31. His twitch, bend and fluidity really stood out to me--seems to have wiry strength. I hope he doesn't have any setbacks--we need his help.
- The DB group was a little slower speed than the LBs. Their individual included brief teaching periods sprinkled throughout. Steele was working with the safeties, while Addae was working with the corners and vice versa. DVD was helping both groups where needed. Steele wasn't happy at all with one of the safeties for not paying attention and really let him know. Overall, the groups looked well organized.
- Check out my notes above on Addae's presentation regarding the corners. 7 looks surprisingly good and locked in. I'll be shocked if he doesn't help a lot this year. It looks like the staff is grooming him to be utility knife. His health will give us depth at safety, star and corner. 8 was doing 8 things like guessing on routes; 23 did a good job in coverage and gives consistent effort; 2 was back and looks head and shoulders better than the rest of them; no one else from that group got my attention. We need help here.
- Safety looked to have more serviceable guys. Seems like Steele himself will be the main one getting them coached up. I'm of the opinion that safeties should be an extension of the defensive coordinator. 0 looks fine in drills; he wants to be a leader. 3 is valuable; he's constantly coaching up the younger guys and was helping 7 learn star/safety; he looks just fine in drills. 15 is so twitchy and explosive that his footwork is a little awkward sometimes, but I don't think the coaches care too much. His physical talent is obvious and he gave good consistent effort during drills from what I saw. 27 looked ok. Steele chewed him out pretty good during drills for mentally busting a footwork drill. 15 made the same exact mistake and Steele was way more patient with him.
- Caught some QB drills right before the team periods started. 11 is freakish with his size and arm strength, but makes awful throws sometimes. Good thing he has plenty of time to work on his craft. We already know that 9 is in a league of his own. 13 looks good. I wouldn't be nervous to see him in the game.
--Team periods:
- Effort and energy was outstanding. Offensive ball carriers were running dudes over; tacklers were going beyond thud and knocking guys down.
- The offense looks good. 9 started off slow before eventually torching the defense repeatedly.
- OL will be a pleasant surprise I think.
- Defensive line is undersized and thin. Too many guys looking like 95 and not enough looking like 33. 12 seems to be a leader on the front; he is regularly getting guys lined up and helping with their assignments. 55 will help us quite a bit. 56 looks ok. 39 looks like he needs a red shirt year and a COVID year before he can help. This unit doesn't get me excited based on what I saw at practice. That being said, they did show good effort. Effort and tackling will go a long way on defense. I think Steele and Co. will squeeze the most out of them.
- On offense I felt like I was watching us run the WingT as times--it was great. We had quick motions on most plays, wingbacks (slot receivers) getting handoffs off misdirection, gap blocking, play action of the quick motion, toughness, etc. Things had rhyme and reason; I felt like I was watching series football.
- 15 and 22 are great fits for this offense. 15 would crush it as a WingT wingback and 22 would be a great WingT fullback.
- Our formations still allow us to run our regular passing game--TVD showed his regular timing and accuracy in the quick game.
- The offense excites me.


Summary:
I don't have the same points of reference as some other coaches who have been plugged into the game recently. However, based on the experience I do have, it was evident that the program is already being run at much higher level than in the past. If every practice is like what we saw, the aggregate needs to yield better results than the past administration (all things remaining equal, obviously). The roster needs a lot of work, but we have stud at QB, a few other very good players and we have the Avengers as a coaching staff. There is an sense importance in the building that I haven't witnessed during prior regimes (maybe that's just my perception). I'm really happy I got the opportunity to get out there.

Go Canes.
Belen?
 
Advertisement
Watching this is giving me flashbacks to Malik Rosier. Their QB was so bad!

I’m so interested to see what this looks like with TVD. The variety in the run game is grueling on defenses. Guys pulling constantly, jet sweep option and play action you can run off of it. 3rd and short my man is lining up in 13 personnel lol some of the 11 sets are basically I-formation looks from the gun. In the passing game it’s clear there’s always a check down. The Michigan qb didn’t have the vision or arm to get to the routes behind the check down but TVD definitely can and will.

I’m intrigued but not sold yet. I gotta see it.
Yeah, I was wondering the same. What does this look like with a QB who's accurate and can push the ball downfield?
 
I'm from the school of thought that fans should mostly care about results on the field on both sides of the ball. As fans we may like something that looks exciting at the beginning but then after seeing the long term result we start seeing the flaws and subsequently question it.

Many of us were excited with Diaz defense at the beginning until opposing teams started exploiting it.

By the way thank you very much for the detailed and comprehensive write up.
Agree. Watching that Michigan tape, I kept thinking man this is boring to watch. But then again, it wins games, and that's really all I care about. People on here get real tied to a particular scheme and insist it's important we use it. I want to run something our guys can do and that gives scores points. That's it.
 
Advertisement
I payed attention to the formations, personnel groupings & play call sequences, along with the route concepts.

The offense itself isn’t anything spectacular, but with good RB’s, TE’s & consistent Slot WR can be effective.


How would you compare it to TAMU's? I know you have mentioned their heavy dosage of RB's and TE's.

SN: Nothing you and everyone else doesn't already know ... but boy our personnel outside of OL is so much better than Michigan it's ridiculous. Haskins sucks and was a product of volume and that OL. If the play wasn't drawn up perfectly and if the hole wasn't created for him, he got them absolutely nothing outside of some plodding yards after contact where he falls forward. A couple of speedy guys but overall, as a group, their skills guys stink. Obviously their QB was the absolute worst as well, my goodness the fact that they made it as far as they did is amazing.
 
How would you compare it to TAMU's? I know you have mentioned their heavy dosage of RB's and TE's.

SN: Nothing you and everyone else doesn't already know ... but boy our personnel outside of OL is so much better than Michigan it's ridiculous. Haskins sucks and was a product of volume and that OL. If the play wasn't drawn up perfectly and if the hole wasn't created for him, he got them absolutely nothing outside of some plodding yards after contact where he falls forward. A couple of speedy guys but overall, as a group, their skills guys stink. Obviously their QB was the absolute worst as well, my goodness the fact that they made it as far as they did is amazing.
TAMU’s is more of a version of the old school West Coast Offense, it’s different in terms of verbiage & concepts but equally as safe & vanilla from a college standpoint. Jumbo’s offense is more predicated on playmakers at TE & RB, Michigan’s offense is ALL about the OL.

Michigan made it to the playoffs last year because OH ST’s Defense was down, they didn’t have the pass rush or the secondary they normally have, plus the B1G as a whole just wasn’t that good to begin with.

They won because they had a good enough Defense & a gigantic Wall of an OL that allowed them to run the ball down everyone’s throat, but once they faced a team with some legit talent they got exposed.
 
Agree. Watching that Michigan tape, I kept thinking man this is boring to watch. But then again, it wins games, and that's really all I care about. People on here get real tied to a particular scheme and insist it's important we use it. I want to run something our guys can do and that gives scores points. That's it.
I think what fans always overlook is understanding the makeup of our roster.

There’s a reason why certain teams run certain schemes & others don’t.

Teams like Wisconsin & Iowa don’t run a prolific offense because they can’t. They work within the confines of their talent & capability, they recruit for it & wins games with ball control, clock management & Defense, because that’s their only way to level the playing field. If they have to gun it out with teams that are built to be more lethal they usually lose.

I don’t think anyone is attached to any specific scheme, it’s matter of looking at our roster & saying, what makes us the hardest to beat & gives us the best chance to score the most points? It’s about utilizing your weapons in an advantageous way to make it as difficult as possible for Defenses to stop you.
 
Context and qualifications:

I've been relatively dormant for some years. For those of you who don't know me: I played at a local high school in the early-mid 2000's, played D3 college ball, then came back to coach at my alma mater for some years before deciding to pursue a career in law. I was on a staff that took down some of the top teams in Dade and I spent most of my time coaching defensive backs and linebackers. I have been out of the game since 2013 mainly because this career (and the firm I was at) absolutely consumes your life. Upon hearing about the coaches' clinic, I reached out to some old colleagues and they were cool enough to let me tag along the group for the weekend. The comments below are based on my own observations and opinions, and feedback from my colleagues.

*excuse the stream of conscious nature of my notes--if I don't make sense, let me know and I will explain*
*I will do my best to not overlap some of the notes from other people--I haven't read anything factually different from my memory/notes*

Day 1:
- Aside from parking, the whole registration process and general organization was great. The IPF is above average, but the facility could use some upgrades--this is not a secret. Overall, though, it seemed sufficient to run a top tier program. The registration period served as a mixer.
- The staff is enormous; they were everywhere, coming from all angles to chat it up. Of note, Kevin Steele was super cool and welcoming. Mario was happy and talking to everyone--it was a great vibe. Once the speakers started, it seems like the staff partially retreated to their offices to get some work done.
-- Kevin Steele: He was my favorite speaker of the night. Really focused on mentality, philosophy, game planning and how to coach tackling. A whole post could be dedicated to his presentation.
-- Jahmile Addae: focused on Press Man coverage. He has a very nice blend of intensity, professionalism and detail orientation. He was able to clearly present exactly what he is expecting from the guys. I was able to watch the DB drills on Day 2 and you could tell his classroom teaching was translating to the field. He ran drills specifically tailored for each phase of the technique.
-- Josh Gattis: I had a caffeine headache, so I couldn't stay for his whole presentation--went to get some coffee. What I caught in the beginning was all I needed to hear, however. He and I are of the school of thought that whatever you run on offense (scheme and philosophy) has the most effect on what becomes of your defense's mentality. In other words, if you're a finesse offense, your defense will be soft. This is where you see his defensive background coming through. Btw, our offense is essentially a modern WingT. I know because I'm a WingT guy. Its more of what I expected from Lashlee (less the pace) than what we actually got from Lashlee, which was air raid.
-- Alex Mirabal: this dude gets me fired up. He's the same guy from when he was at FIU--but interestingly enough, his teaching points have changed. I don't want to throw him under the bus, but he had some cutting edge techniques that had me upset hearing as defensive guy.
-- Coach O: Dude was an absolute trip. Shared the story of him coming to Miami; explained the importance of learning more than just your position group, but also staying in your lane and only coaching your own position; talked about the kind of dedication needed to be great; went into some technique stuff too. He presentation was kinda everywhere (like him) but made sense in a circular kind of way.
-- Jimmy Johnson: This was a dream come true for me. The whole thing didn't seem real. He spent most of his time talking about leadership and the importance of having good players and elevating your players and staff. If you watched the NFL films documentary on Jimmy, then you got the gist of his share. The thing I got most out of his share is the importance of investing in your people and keeping them on a sliding scale based on their value to the organization.
- I couldn't stick around for the position group breakout sessions. I regret taking my wife out to dinner instead of this. Lesson learned.

Day 2:
- I got in at 7 to make sure I got enough coffee to make it through the day. Breakfast was sufficient--just the standard continental breakfast items. Enough food for everyone and more.
-- Coach Feld: buddy came in like a bat out of **** around 7:45 to get his presentation going. I came away impressed. He spoke briefly about building mental toughness and how they define each of its aspects. One quote I liked was "You start to love the things that are hard once you get good at them." He said this in the context of coaching kids who don't necessarily love football and don't always want to participate in its rigors. It kind of gives them hope that pushing through the tough times will be worth it.
- Feld took us into the weight room and allowed his staff to present their training philosophy. They listed a hierarchy of 7 movements: neck strength>core strength>loaded hip hinge>leg strength>press strength>hamstrings>pullups (this is my recollection--might be wrong). They were super welcoming and cool. I am going to reach out to them to get some more info.
-- Darren Rizzi: took us outside and ran us through what felt like 50 special teams drills in like 5 minutes. It all made sense and it was all very fast--it was remarkable. What I got out of it is to avoid 11 on 11 special teams drilling and teaching. You should break special teams up into multiple individual units and specialize your teaching. The whole staff should be very involved in this. No one takes a break during special teams practice.
-- Sean McVey: Importance of having good players; philosophical stuff about blending the run and pass. I can expand this later if requested. This post is already too long.

[Practice]:
- We got a copy of the practice schedule and I did my best to follow along. Seems like we were either on time or early with the period schedule.
- Again, we have a million coaches. They were all fired up and they were all engaged. The player/coach(staff) ratio is clearly better than ever.
- I was able to watch DB and LB individual periods about 60/40 percent, respectively.
- Coach Strong is TOUGH on the guys. Sheesh. The kids were responding well, however. Their effort during individual period was outstanding. If there was a whiff of a player cutting a rep short or making a mental mistake, they were hearing about it in an uncomfortable way.
- There are probably 3-5 guys that all look roughly the same to me. No one really stood out other than 31. His twitch, bend and fluidity really stood out to me--seems to have wiry strength. I hope he doesn't have any setbacks--we need his help.
- The DB group was a little slower speed than the LBs. Their individual included brief teaching periods sprinkled throughout. Steele was working with the safeties, while Addae was working with the corners and vice versa. DVD was helping both groups where needed. Steele wasn't happy at all with one of the safeties for not paying attention and really let him know. Overall, the groups looked well organized.
- Check out my notes above on Addae's presentation regarding the corners. 7 looks surprisingly good and locked in. I'll be shocked if he doesn't help a lot this year. It looks like the staff is grooming him to be utility knife. His health will give us depth at safety, star and corner. 8 was doing 8 things like guessing on routes; 23 did a good job in coverage and gives consistent effort; 2 was back and looks head and shoulders better than the rest of them; no one else from that group got my attention. We need help here.
- Safety looked to have more serviceable guys. Seems like Steele himself will be the main one getting them coached up. I'm of the opinion that safeties should be an extension of the defensive coordinator. 0 looks fine in drills; he wants to be a leader. 3 is valuable; he's constantly coaching up the younger guys and was helping 7 learn star/safety; he looks just fine in drills. 15 is so twitchy and explosive that his footwork is a little awkward sometimes, but I don't think the coaches care too much. His physical talent is obvious and he gave good consistent effort during drills from what I saw. 27 looked ok. Steele chewed him out pretty good during drills for mentally busting a footwork drill. 15 made the same exact mistake and Steele was way more patient with him.
- Caught some QB drills right before the team periods started. 11 is freakish with his size and arm strength, but makes awful throws sometimes. Good thing he has plenty of time to work on his craft. We already know that 9 is in a league of his own. 13 looks good. I wouldn't be nervous to see him in the game.
--Team periods:
- Effort and energy was outstanding. Offensive ball carriers were running dudes over; tacklers were going beyond thud and knocking guys down.
- The offense looks good. 9 started off slow before eventually torching the defense repeatedly.
- OL will be a pleasant surprise I think.
- Defensive line is undersized and thin. Too many guys looking like 95 and not enough looking like 33. 12 seems to be a leader on the front; he is regularly getting guys lined up and helping with their assignments. 55 will help us quite a bit. 56 looks ok. 39 looks like he needs a red shirt year and a COVID year before he can help. This unit doesn't get me excited based on what I saw at practice. That being said, they did show good effort. Effort and tackling will go a long way on defense. I think Steele and Co. will squeeze the most out of them.
- On offense I felt like I was watching us run the WingT as times--it was great. We had quick motions on most plays, wingbacks (slot receivers) getting handoffs off misdirection, gap blocking, play action of the quick motion, toughness, etc. Things had rhyme and reason; I felt like I was watching series football.
- 15 and 22 are great fits for this offense. 15 would crush it as a WingT wingback and 22 would be a great WingT fullback.
- Our formations still allow us to run our regular passing game--TVD showed his regular timing and accuracy in the quick game.
- The offense excites me.


Summary:
I don't have the same points of reference as some other coaches who have been plugged into the game recently. However, based on the experience I do have, it was evident that the program is already being run at much higher level than in the past. If every practice is like what we saw, the aggregate needs to yield better results than the past administration (all things remaining equal, obviously). The roster needs a lot of work, but we have stud at QB, a few other very good players and we have the Avengers as a coaching staff. There is an sense importance in the building that I haven't witnessed during prior regimes (maybe that's just my perception). I'm really happy I got the opportunity to get out there.

Go Canes.
Thank you
 
Back
Top