Analytics... (kinda OT but kinda not)

gabednconfused

That/Dude
Joined
Nov 7, 2011
Messages
2,554
I was thinking at lunch today about that quote of Richt going 'off feel' with the QB benching of Kosi, the onside kick, even some of his play calling...

So I ended up asking myself "I wonder if our team has an in-game simulation model?"

I know it sounds daft to some, but in this day in age, you need data. So I did some googling and found this company that seems to build an in-game computer model for CFB teams. Seems either Bama or Clemson use the software to supplement coaching decision making in critical situations (I suspect its Bama, based on the Kiffin tie-in). These situations are based usually on points differential, down and distance, and clock time left. They are influenced by statistics (e.g. moneyball type historical data).

I came across this company Championship Analytics, which seem to have gone to the absurd length of patenting their tech to do this: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/99/f5/a0/b5fcdb1e86fcdd/US9424615.pdf

Personally, I woulda just went to the computer science dept in McArthur and found the dean to create a Phd project for 5 students to come up with my own model. I don't know the fidelity of the Championship model, so in cases like this I would say make our own. Also, its cheaper.

We can think of two at least three poor strategic decisions from the past game vs UVA which probably negatively effected our win probability. There are probably a host of other situations which can be influenced by it.

The thing with in-game statistical models is, as you play you re-run them constantly, changing the analysis from predicted to actual, basically making the accuracy better. Over the length of a game, that might be worth 1 score, or maybe just a few yards or TOP, but raising win probability from 45-51% is all you need some times (just an example).

------------------

Reason I am so passionate about this- I work for a huge sports team as an engineer (in a sport where engineering matters) and we develop our own strategy computer models to help get us to victory lane. All of our competitors do. Our computer models directly effect the outcome of our races, and what we do during the races, and they change as things progress as well, opening up new possibilities to exploit our competition.

This is very applicable to football, and seemingly isnt being utilized on a wide-spread scale.

Hope there are coaches reading this board... time to build a computer model guys. Gimmie a call for some help.

2018-CAI-AFCA-Profile-with-FAU-FINAL-1.webp
 
Advertisement
Analytics has already made MLB significantly more boring and less fun.

You shouldnt need a CPU to tell you not to onside kick with three minutes left, a crushing defense, and three TOs. If a coach needs a robot to tell him, then the coach is a ******* useless garbage pile.
 
hing defense, and three TOs. If a coach needs a robot to tell him, then the coach is a ******* useless garba


I do not agree lol. How bad do you want to win? It doesn't stop players from getting their **** pushed in, it just helps make the critical decisions a bit more clear.

Also, **** baseball, generally. Boring sport.
 
Analytics has already made MLB significantly more boring and less fun.

You shouldnt need a CPU to tell you not to onside kick with three minutes left, a crushing defense, and three TOs. If a coach needs a robot to tell him, then the coach is a ******* useless garbage pile.

Haha. I was going to say the same. That I stopped reading at the word "analytics" because it ruined baseball. There's also a case in several recent instances where the over-reliance on analytics have actually cost lazy managers some very big games.

I'm absolutely not opposed to utilizing trends and math/science in sport but I absolutely think you can do it to a point where it's an actual detriment instead of an advantage.
 
How bout these analytics:

When the defense is keying in on the run, play action pass.

When the DBs are pre-snap bailing on the deep pass, bubble screen or slant.

When the defense is off the L.O.S, check down into a run.

When the LB is covering ur TE w no safety help, throw to ur TE.

When the defense is using a single high safety, look to one side, pump the ball, and then go to the other side for the home run.

When ur down 2 scores, w under 10 to play, hurry up O.

When ur down one score w 3 TOs and 3 mins to play w ur def playing lights out, DO NOT ONSIDE KICK THE BALL!

See how easy that is.
 
Last edited:
How bout these analytics:

When the defense is keying in on the run, play action pass.

When the DBs are pre-snap bailing on the deep pass, bubble screen or slant.

When the defense is off the L.O.S, check down into a run.

When the LB is covering ur TE w no safety help, throw to ur TE.

When the defense is using a single high safety, look to one side, pump the ball, and then go to the other side for the home run.

When ur down 2 scores, w under 10 to play, hurry up O.

When ur down one score w 3 TOs and 3 mins to play w ur def playing lights out, DO NOT ONSIDE KICK THE BALL!

See how easy that is.

Question... how is ^ not worth half of his 2 million dollar salary?
 
There are a number of sports data & analytics companies out there and an increasing number of teams - at least in the NFL - looking to incorporate analytics into their organization. Football to date has been ok with data but people are just starting to learn how analytics can be applied. Same with basketball.

Quality of data and the technology that captures it is also advancing quite a bit. Sportlogiq, Championship, then you also have STATs, Sportrader, and other sports data providers all pushing the industry. Its an exciting time if you're into this stuff - which admittedly my company is.

I can tell you that 99% of college football coaches have no idea how or why to use data.

Would love to see UM at least do some exploratory analysis on tendencies and probabilities. Maybe they are and its just not translating to scheme and game planning.
 
Advertisement
There are a number of sports data & analytics companies out there and an increasing number of teams - at least in the NFL - looking to incorporate analytics into their organization. Football to date has been ok with data but people are just starting to learn how analytics can be applied. Same with basketball.

Quality of data and the technology that captures it is also advancing quite a bit. Sportlogiq, Championship, then you also have STATs, Sportrader, and other sports data providers all pushing the industry. Its an exciting time if you're into this stuff - which admittedly my company is.

I can tell you that 99% of college football coaches have no idea how or why to use data.

Would love to see UM at least do some exploratory analysis on tendencies and probabilities. Maybe they are and its just not translating to scheme and game planning.

I am unsure if they are... yet.

PM me your company... interested.
 
How bout these analytics:

When the defense is keying in on the run, play action pass.

When the DBs are pre-snap bailing on the deep pass, bubble screen or slant.

When the defense is off the L.O.S, check down into a run.

When the LB is covering ur TE w no safety help, throw to ur TE.

When the defense is using a single high safety, look to one side, pump the ball, and then go to the other side for the home run.

When ur down 2 scores, w under 10 to play, hurry up O.

When ur down one score w 3 TOs and 3 mins to play w ur def playing lights out, DO NOT ONSIDE KICK THE BALL!

See how easy that is.

Amazing how we do none of these things!!
 
Fvck analytics.

We called plays that we practiced all week, I know that. We called plays that we had faith in. We called plays that we thought we give us the best chance in all situations. We called plays where we took shots. We called plays just trying to run the ball — we had inside zone, outside zone, we ran counter.

We ran things we thought would succeed and they didn’t. And why they didn’t succeed, we’ll see. Most of the time when you look at the tape it’s a matter of somebody or a couple of guys not getting their job done, normally.

Are there some plays that we could call that would give us a better chance? I’m certain of that, but we call plays that we worked hard on, believed in and have had success over the last 30 years, so I feel pretty good about them going in.
 
Other elite teams use it. I believe the interviewers were talking to Meyer about it last year and he said OSU uses it. I know other teams use it as well. 0 chance Richt will use it unless someone is willing to chisel it onto a stone tablet for him.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top