forums

[Agreement Reached] Miami Emerges As Favorite For Duke Transfer QB Darian Mensah/Plus hidden menu items at Publix, Greatest Wrestlers debate

Status
Not open for further replies.
View as article
Cant even trust UNC legal affiliations/connections as we play Belichek this year…we are screwed in this state 🤣
 
Advertisement
aelmiami said:
SIAP, I ain’t sifting through all the posts. But can someone who’s not a moron like me explain wtf a bond means?

The bond is $1k. A comment says it’s usually $10k in cases like this again.


Click to expand...

Also interested in wtf that means
 
So from reading the Athletic article and subsequent comments a few things were learned:

- the hate for Miami is back as strong as ever, which is fantastic
- the entire premise Duke has for their case is "we can't prevent him from enrolling elsewhere or entering the portal, but since we own his NIL rights, nobody else can sign an NIL deal with him, only we can pay him for his NIL"

Basically Duke's position in their agreement is "he is not allowed to get an NIL deal elsewhere even if he leaves us, but if he does leave us we won't have to pay him the NIL deal that we claim is guaranteed in stone". A ridiculous, disgusting "contract" that basically says the student is owned by Duke.
 
Advertisement
Canes Legacy said:
brad pitt aldo raine GIF
Click to expand...

Well played, sir! 👍🏻
 
SIBCanes said:
It is so much fun on X trolling Duke fans. You can’t tamper take who ever you want. Oh like you did to Tulane. But he has a contract, oh you mean you have an employer contract that he has to go to Duke.. Relax no judge will force a kid to stay in a college. Miami booster will pay any buyout. That ends this. Really bad look by Duke. Just have fun an troll them saying no athlete will ever go to Duke again.
Click to expand...

I went through it with the Wisconsin fans last year. Most exhausting trolling I’ve done. 72 hours straight. I might jump into this one and drag some Duke fans to the deep end.
 
goblin deez nuts said:


Not sure who this guy is, but hes been killing it if true
Click to expand...


Some highlights from Heitner's burner for non-lawyers like me trying to decipher the situation

The judge made oral comments from the bench, then recused himself​
​
This take treats non-final, non-written, non-reasoned bench posture as if it were a binding injunction. That’s just wrong procedurally.​
​
The author spins the lack of findings as Duke-friendly. In reality:​
​
•TROs without findings are weak​
•They don’t bind the next judge​
•They don’t survive appellate scrutiny​
•They don’t predict PI outcomes. A new judge + no findings = reset, not momentum.​
​
​
The portal carve-out is not meaningless. The take says “so what?”​
But legally, it’s huge:​
​
• It allows lawful contact​
• It prevents tampering claims​
• It keeps NCAA compliance clean​
• It preserves market signaling​
​
​
 
Last edited:
pacusmc said:
This dude could be in the corner of a prison shower getting unconsensual back shots while screaming he won.
Click to expand...
He’s just plain wrong. The court grating an emergency TRO pending hearing two weeks later isn’t a major win or prediction as to the merits of the case. Procedurally, the Court isn’t going to grant a TRO at a hearing two hours after suit is filed. Also, judge who has to recuse himself isn’t going to do anything but punt to later date. Both parties need adequate time to fully brief the court on the underlying motion and response in opposition.

Duke people are massively coping right now. This Court isn’t going to make some unprecedented college athletics shattering ruling absent any applicable statutory authority or case law. This is the Wild West.
 
Advertisement
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top