If a car in its lane with the right of way hits you, you didn't have the room to make a safe left turn.U’re trying to argue correlation vs. causation. The two r not synonymous.
So let’s use this example:
Based upon distance, I have the right to make a left turn, however, u r distracted by texting and driving, talking on the phone, arguing w someone, or just plain speeding seeing if u can play the daredevil game “chicken.” Who’s at fault? This is why SIU guys get paid handsomely & it’s not a glorious job, especially when lives r involved.
So the argument of the left-turn is moot; drivers have responsibilities, that’s why there are laws. If Adarius was shown or proven to be driving at a reckless speed, he can be found civilly liable, while also being deemed not at-fault in the accident at the same time. Again, does it matter if he’s shown to be reckless?
you played chicken and lost or didn't see them
your last paragraph I agree with civil, all it takes is 1% negligence