Acc

Every NFL scout will tell you the best football is played in the SEC. Hence the number of NFL players from the SEC. To me it's not just that, but the pure love, passion and game day experiences the SEC provides. I'm a college junkie so that stuff is huge for me. Other than Miami playing in the game, the only other matchup I would pay to go see would be Clemson and FSU (in most years). There are quite a few I would pay to watch in the SEC.


I'm 100% jealous that UF gets to play in a conference that worships college football. Miami is in the cheese and wine basketball conference.
 
Advertisement
Christ, some of you boys gobbling up the SEC balls deep. You guys further perpetuate the myth that SEC in the conference tag means greatness. Noone is rooting for the ACC. **** the other ACC teams, but carrying on the SEC myth further validates to recruits that a Kentucky or Tennessee is a better option simply because SEC is next to their name. We're just trying to point out the hypocrisy in comparison. You keep buying into the hype and we'll keep losing the recruits.

Notice at no point in time an i denying that SEC is the best fairly often or that the ACC is equal fairly often. Just saying when you validate an entire conference based on 1 or 2 good teams we end up losing to the lesser teams.
 
I wonder about some of y'all if somehow we magically ended up in the SEC if you'd cheer for Miami or chant SEC.
 
Every NFL scout will tell you the best football is played in the SEC. Hence the number of NFL players from the SEC. To me it's not just that, but the pure love, passion and game day experiences the SEC provides. I'm a college junkie so that stuff is huge for me. Other than Miami playing in the game, the only other matchup I would pay to go see would be Clemson and FSU (in most years). There are quite a few I would pay to watch in the SEC.


I'm 100% jealous that UF gets to play in a conference that worships college football. Miami is in the cheese and wine basketball conference.

There were 7 more players drafted in this years draft from the SEC than the ACC. The talent level difference isn't as wide as thought of.
 
Christ, some of you boys gobbling up the SEC balls deep. You guys further perpetuate the myth that SEC in the conference tag means greatness. Noone is rooting for the ACC. **** the other ACC teams, but carrying on the SEC myth further validates to recruits that a Kentucky or Tennessee is a better option simply because SEC is next to their name. We're just trying to point out the hypocrisy in comparison. You keep buying into the hype and we'll keep losing the recruits.

Notice at no point in time an i denying that SEC is the best fairly often or that the ACC is equal fairly often. Just saying when you validate an entire conference based on 1 or 2 good teams we end up losing to the lesser teams.


And you can clearly see this with guys on this board with "cane" on their last name. Like wtf?. I don't get it. The only f*cks that scream conferences are SEC fans. Reason they do it is because their middle of the road teams have nothing else to hang their hat onto..while Bama runs rough shod over the conference. The pure passion, the love, the crowd...oh c*t the bullsh*t lol
 
What’s worse is ACC slurpers ignoring the losses by the conference. Y’all must’ve woke up the neighborhood when Duke beat Temple.

There is no such thing as acc slurpers unless were talking basketball...we leave that for you and the other sec fans...and mainly only care about Um.
 
You’re embarrassing your parents, dude.

You don’t defend conferences but your entire argument, and thread for that matter, is based on just that? Again, desperate!

If you only care about Miami, why does it bother you when people recognize, rightly, that the ACC sucks (oh, you’re defending sucking? Figures.)

You’re just another CIS fool.

My thread was to bait and troll conference slurpers/d*ck eaters and you lined up right away mouth wide open lol.
 
There were 7 more players drafted in this years draft from the SEC than the ACC. The talent level difference isn't as wide as thought of.

How does that look going back the last 10-20 years. I know the SEC has had the most players drafted the last 12 years. That is very telling.

I think if you go back roughly 11-12 years, the SEC has had 512 players drafted and the ACC 383. I'm not sure if that was before the 2108 draft. Even further, the SEC had 101 go in the first round, while the ACC had 58. Again, not sure if that is pre 2018.

The last year the ACC had more players picked in the draft was 2006.

Sure, the talent gap really isn't that wide.
 
And Maryland beat Texas … your point? You’re making an argument for the ACC based off of a Clemson team? And an UVA outlier? The 4 teams that finished ahead of UVA in the coastal all lost? Or does the Clemson win cleanse the ACC stench?

Texas A&M beat the 3rd best team in the ACC by 39 points and it was never that close.

The ACC is more overrated than the SEC is overrated (and, imo, the SEC is not overrated; they’re clearly the best football conference)

589F5500-9133-40DC-9418-E6F0D9AB3FA5.gif
 
Advertisement
That’s absurd. There is way more than one or two good teams in the SEC. Yes, they did have a stretch where some of their teams did suck. But so did the ACC for all but maybe one or two years, and that’s going back almost 20. It’s just reality, the SEC is head and shoulders over every other conference. Which has absolutely nothing to do with what makes someone a Miami hurricanes fan. Only an idiot would see those two things as being mutually exclusive.

But man do we have a lot of ACC slurping idiots on this board.

Its a f*cking miami hurricane football board. Not sure why your even on here?. Ninja is legit questioning fans on a um board to puff up the teams he gives a blowy to every weekend

what team out of what conference won the mnc this year? say it...do it.....do it?,
 
The SEC is definitely somewhat overrated. It can’t be as good as it is hyped to be when LSU has a corch and UF is down, because those two schools plus UGA have the natural talent base. Auburn fluffs Alabama. Georgia is stylistically chasing Bama. A&M may differentiate but time will tell - they can pull talent. UT has a tough road back. MS teams whatever. USCe isn’t serious. Kentucky won’t become a football power.

But there are some differences to note. On field, the SEC has a powerful combination of big ten size and Southern speed skill. It makes SEC teams capable of matching up with both power and speed teams. Also, tv contract aside, the SEC has a lot of big state schools in football country that care and take football seriously. The attendence at SEC games > ACC. The budgets, stadiums, facilities follow. And boosters follow. So bags. And kids. And Emmert is on their payroll.

On a negative, SEC schools do not have innovative coaches, for the most part. They’ve all geared up for internal competition. You cannot win in a conference with Alabama in it without power / size. So they do utilize spread concepts in places but it’s not where really innovative coaches go, imo. Meyer left. We’ll see what Jimbo does. Florida will be interesting to watch also.

Chasing Alabama will end up leading many of those programs to a place where they suffer and the Clemsons, Oklahomas, and whatever other programs get with it out of UM, FSU, USC, TX, et al. Regain style superiority with speed and innovation, imo.
 
Clearly, you don’t know that. You only proven that you’re an SEC hater and an ACC slurper. You’re a tangential Miami hurricanes fan.

Clemson wins a national championship and your sorry *** is talking about “we”.

Like Malcolm X said about your “kind” and the word “we”



giphy.gif
 
And Maryland beat Texas … your point? You’re making an argument for the ACC based off of a Clemson team? And an UVA outlier? The 4 teams that finished ahead of UVA in the coastal all lost? Or does the Clemson win cleanse the ACC stench?

Texas A&M beat the 3rd best team in the ACC by 39 points and it was never that close.

The ACC is more overrated than the SEC is overrated (and, imo, the SEC is not overrated; they’re clearly the best football conference)

So you're comparing the first game of the season vs. a bowl game. NICE! I just stated that the ACC teams, you know, one being from the awful coastal conference, didn't just beat, but destroyed an SEC team with a similar record in a bowl game (keep up with the rest of us, we are talking bowl games here).

I don't know if NCst is the "3rd best team in the ACC" (your words) but we can still say ACC is 2-1 vs SEC in blow outs. Congrats, your teams conference won one blowout. :applouse:

Outside of LSU, what top SEC team won against conference champs or conference runner up? Answer...NONE. They all got smacked around (Texas smacked Georgia around, the score was only close from 2 quick TDs at the end).

Some of us here, myself included, don't go slurping and thinking that the SEC conference is the best.

You slurp the SEC so much, which team is yours?
 
Advertisement
The SEC went 6-6 in bowls. The ACC was 6-5.
SEC's two "great" teams that got all the hype, Alabama and Georgia, when forced to play good teams out of conference, got thrashed by the ACC & Big 12.

But the SEC hicks have always bragged that their titles are what make them great, so if we're to go by that, the last 6 years of national championships look like this:

ACC: 3
SEC: 2
Big Ten: 1
 
Again for those who missed it. In summary, SEC is the best conference most of the time, but they are not this uncatchable behemoth. They are not 12 teams deep with amazing programs. If you rated the SEC as the best conference (let's say 8 out of 10) on average the other conferences would be maybe a 6 or 7, but SEC hype men would have you believe the SEC is a 10 and everyone else is like a 5. Let in mind we're talking over time, not just this year. ACC was garbage this year. No doubt, but let's not give the SEC more credit than they deserve
 
Back
Top