forums

ACC unanimously supports one time transfers

Advertisement
From what we’ve seen so far, most CFB players in the portal are not starter quality. Sure, there are a few and we’ve been fortunate to get a few, but for the most part it seems most are looking for PT they’re not getting on their current team for obvious reasons. Include GT’s in this as well as players like KJ looking to improve their draft stock. Hurting depth is surely a negative.
 
Advertisement
MIATL said:
Immediate eligibility will be the toughest on G5 programs. Kids are gonna follow coaches in droves, and will level up as soon as possible.

G5 will become the minor league for some P5 programs ...
Click to expand...
ACC will become minor league for the SEC. Will make the best teams better and average teams worse.
 
This will eliminate class rankings in recruiting because if you land a bunch of high caliber players & they don't play as TF's they're out the door.

This can be both a good & bad thing overall. It will expedite the development process & forcing coaches to play kids much faster than they want to & it will also create a vibrant Free Agency market for good players that wanna move around.

Teams like Bama, UGA, LSU etc will no longer get to hoard all the talent, kids may still be front running bandwagon riders in recruiting, but unless they play day one, they'll be recruited by other coaching staffs that can guarantee them starter roles & you'll see a lot more of those kids getting swooped from the powerhouses, even after they sign them.

It will also even the playing field with coaches, the smart personable coaches will still keep the bulk of their players, the malevolent dictator type coaches are fcked. Can't manipulate the kids anymore, can't get away with selling them a bill of goods, you either have to be a man of your word & tell them the truth or the kid will tell you to fck off & is outta there.
 
Advertisement
Going to be a disaster. Conferences+NCAA are really feeling the heat
 
Advertisement
Liberty City El said:
This will eliminate class rankings in recruiting because if you land a bunch of high caliber players & they don't play as TF's they're out the door.

This can be both a good & bad thing overall. It will expedite the development process & forcing coaches to play kids much faster than they want to & it will also create a vibrant Free Agency market for good players that wanna move around.

Teams like Bama, UGA, LSU etc will no longer get to hoard all the talent, kids may still be front running bandwagon riders in recruiting, but unless they play day one, they'll be recruited by other coaching staffs that can guarantee them starter roles & you'll see a lot more of those kids getting swooped from the powerhouses, even after they sign them.

It will also even the playing field with coaches, the smart personable coaches will still keep the bulk of their players, the malevolent dictator type coaches are fcked. Can't manipulate the kids anymore, can't get away with selling them a bill of goods, you either have to be a man of your word & tell them the truth or the kid will tell you to fck off & is outta there.
Click to expand...


All of that makes too much sense. Commence pandemonium.
 
I don't have an issue with this, but they need to find a way to allow schools to bring in more kids per class if they are going to continue to make it easier for kids to transfer. I know the rules limiting a school to 25 kids per year was made with good intentions to stop the Alabama's of the world from over signing and making kids grey shirt, but we have seen how hard it is for Miami to get back to 85 scholarships and one would imagine this will only make things worse.
 
MIATL said:
Immediate eligibility will be the toughest on G5 programs. Kids are gonna follow coaches in droves, and will level up as soon as possible.

G5 will become the minor league for some P5 programs ...
Click to expand...
Why would droves of players suddenly be good enough for P5 schools simply because a coach who recruited them moved up?
 
Advertisement
The ACC supports one time transfers? So it won’t support 2 time transfers? I guess Tate isn’t ever going to become a Nole!
 
If Miami does what Miami should be doing, then we should get 1-2 guys every year looking to boost their draft stock.

Good lord, this has YUGE implications my dudes. The slippery slope is slippery right now.
 
JD08 said:
The ACC can say this all they want and it might start momentum, but until the NCAA gets on board, it has no weight. They will have to address the 85 scholarship/ 25 per year issue.
Click to expand...
Big 10 already announced it supported this.
 
Advertisement
Back
Top