- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 25,932
Are You still drunk this morning g Vern?
Rosier is taller than 5'11Rosier was 5'11 Tate is noticebaly shorter then him, theres a pic of them standing next to each other
5'10He’s 5’11, that’s what he was measured as at the Nike opening
This is played out.Tate and Williams both are the truth . Perry doesn't have the head for this game. He needs to go star in porns or something .
I didn’t know Williams played for f$u.
Lol, Liquor is truth serumAre You still drunk this morning g Vern?
People thinking Bama and Clemson got title game because of the QB play is funny.
Nope he was 5’10.5 at the opening which is always rounded to 5’115'10
No, but it was a reason why we weren’t even competing in the acc last yearPeople thinking Bama and Clemson got title game because of the QB play is funny.
That means he is 5'10Nope he was 5’10.5 at the opening which is always rounded to 5’11
Vern’s “dumbass” argument is no less than the argument that this Miami team can NOT beat Clemson. If history is the guide (i.e. Miami losing to lesser teams when Miami has lesser coaching) then the historical fact is that Miami also wins big games when Miami has great coaching. You seem to be wait and see - and that’s alright; I just think Miami has the right coaches, right now.
You can join the bandwagon later.
Holy ****..
The ACC has sucked for the last 15 years
We have had mediocre QB's the last 15 years
We have won 10 games once in the last 15 years in this supposedly horrible conference
Now you say we easily win 10 games with another mediocre/below average QB because the ACC sucks this year even tho it always has?
Do we not see a trend here??
Whats the difference? Please elaborate?
Only way we win 10 games with another mediocre to below average QB is if our defense scores 8 touchdowns again and forces another 33 turnovers
5’11 lol, doesn’t even matter. College football has seen plenty of great short qbs lately such as Kyler Murray, Manziel, mayfield(just over 6’0, Mackenzie Milton, D’eriq King to name a fewThat means he is 5'10
Christ
Holy ****..
The ACC has sucked for the last 15 years
We have had mediocre QB's the last 15 years
We have won 10 games once in the last 15 years in this supposedly horrible conference
Now you say we easily win 10 games with another mediocre/below average QB because the ACC sucks this year even tho it always has?
Do we not see a trend here??
Whats the difference? Please elaborate?
Only way we win 10 games with another mediocre to below average QB is if our defense scores 8 touchdowns again and forces another 33 turnovers
clemson wont be beaten by us without elite talent at the QB spot. were not as talented as they are all around unless we start banging up sunshine where hes thrown off his game. we need to make it closer tho than we did the last two times we've played them tho
Clemson won With Deshaun Watson and Sunshine but lost with Kelly Bryant... Hmmm Just a coincidence I guess![]()
No, but it was a reason why we weren’t even competing in the acc last year
You answered your own question, big guy. With mediocre and bad QB play, you’re right. We don’t and won't win. I clearly said good QB play will allow us to win 10+. Good being a better cut than what we’ve had. I’m clearly stating that with good QB play (i.e. better than mediocre/below average, which are your words) we shouldn’t struggle to win 10 games. If you disagree that 1. Good QB play is better than mediocre/below average play 2. That good QB play will lead to us winning 10+ games then you’re a dumbass for not accepting 1 and we disagree on 2. You inserted a totally different argument into mine to argue with yourself. This isn’t play time with the porsters. Try to keep up with the arguments presented or stfu and keep it moving to Warchant.
All of itQB play was the problem or the OC/scheme/playing calling wasn't a problem?