forums

‘Don’t do anything stupid.’

gogeta4 said:
this is what shocked me....the bolded.

it was almost like he or the defensive staff didnt realize bell goes for 100 every **** game.
Click to expand...
I'm also super tired of this "Bell is going to get his let's take away everything else" mentality. That's a recipe for 14 catches, 232 yards, 2 tds.

I'm old enough to recall Barry Sanders running for -1 yards, 9 yards against Reggie White and the Packers in playoff position deciding games in the 90s.

When you have a Reggie White (Rueben Bain) caliber player & you're not named Mark Oh No! Frio, you should be neutralizing the other team's strengths.
 
Advertisement
LuCane said:
In a separate post after I made my own. Now you're moving the goal posts to this. Keep going. I'm filibustering and you're scrambling around making things up. All day long talking to a fake internet tough guy. Pure entertainment.
Click to expand...
Your routine here is funny.

Constantly dancing around because your thread is stupid.
 
Stingarov said:
I'm also super tired of this "Bell is going to get his let's take away everything else" mentality. That's a recipe for 14 catches, 232 yards, 2 tds.

I'm old enough to recall Barry Sanders running for -1 yards, 9 yards against Reggie White and the Packers in playoff position deciding games in the 90s.

When you have a Reggie White (Rueben Bain) caliber player & you're not named Mark Oh No! Frio, you should be neutralizing the other team's strengths.
Click to expand...
Louisville's gameplan against Bain was unfortunately on point. They cut him. They went away from him. They emphasized the quick hitters. They saw exactly what we previously showed and used it against him/us.

The long runs (3rd and 10, 2nd and 13, etc.) against our "nascar" pass rush package were beautiful calls.

I do give Hetherman some credit for multiple adjustments. We switched between man and zone multiple times - even though our LBs were exploited in coverage.
 
LuCane said:
Louisville's gameplan against Bain was unfortunately on point. They cut him. They went away from him. They emphasized the quick hitters. They saw exactly what we previously showed and used it against him/us.

The long runs (3rd and 10, 2nd and 13, etc.) against our "nascar" pass rush package were beautiful calls.

I do give Hetherman some credit for multiple adjustments. We switched between man and zone multiple times - even though our LBs were exploited in coverage.
Click to expand...

Yeah no issue with Hetherman's switch ups, mainly just the lack of bracketing 0.
 
LuCane said:
Louisville's gameplan against Bain was unfortunately on point. They cut him. They went away from him. They emphasized the quick hitters. They saw exactly what we previously showed and used it against him/us.

The long runs (3rd and 10, 2nd and 13, etc.) against our "nascar" pass rush package were beautiful calls.

I do give Hetherman some credit for multiple adjustments. We switched between man and zone multiple times - even though our LBs were exploited in coverage.
Click to expand...
Heatherman knowing the wanted quick game should’ve stayed just base 4 down and played tight to allow the pass rush to get there the NASCAR just wasn’t working tonight bc it didn’t have the time to
 
Advertisement
canes732 said:
Heatherman knowing the wanted quick game should’ve stayed just base 4 down and played tight to allow the pass rush to get there the NASCAR just wasn’t working tonight bc it didn’t have the time to
Click to expand...
Last night, in multiple scenarios, I'd say it actually worked against us.

Part of the theme of this thread is that, under Mario, we’re reactive and he’s apparently even gotten Dawson to explicitly say this ‘grind it out’ and ‘don’t make stupid mistakes’ is the way.

I’d hope the coordinators do their own thing more often, but we were behind the 8 ball last night even by our own players’ quotes about their prep.
 
LuCane said:
Last night, in multiple scenarios, I'd say it actually worked against us.

Part of the theme of this thread is that, under Mario, we’re reactive and he’s apparently even gotten Dawson to explicitly say this ‘grind it out’ and ‘don’t make stupid mistakes’ is the way.

I’d hope the coordinators do their own thing more often, but we were behind the 8 ball last night even by our own players’ quotes about their prep.
Click to expand...
It really was strange to me how ill prepared we were for brohm. 3 QBs or not his plan is always vaguely the same in general concept and we acted like we didn’t have a clue about it.
Reactive is a good word for us and it’s damning for the money we pay this staff
 
It's the classic statement to a RB.... You don't say "don't fumble' you say "protect the ball"

should be saying. "Play smart" and then hopefully our coaches are smart and prepared the kid to do that. See that's the question I have. What are the coaches doing?
 
Brad_Wellson said:
Your routine here is funny.

Constantly dancing around because your thread is stupid.
Click to expand...
Seems like a valid question whether a desire to limit mistakes and negative plays in holding back the offensive potential.

What is your take on whether our offensive tendencies are predictable based on formation and personnel and whether we are running enough RPO/Counter/Power/Trap so teams can't run blitz duo with no fear?

Some opposing fan breakdown (I forget which) said it is basically obvious when we are gonna run duo and that we run mesh out of certain look but not others (which at the time I assumed was a set up to break tendency when necessary).
 
Glow said:
Seems like a valid question whether a desire to limit mistakes and negative plays in holding back the offensive potential.
Click to expand...
But his quote is completely out of context and is refuted by the simple fact that we *did* do a lot of stupid things in this game.

And we did so by being *aggressive* and not conservative.

This was a dumb thread from the jump.
 
Advertisement
Glow said:
What is your take on whether our offensive tendencies are predictable based on formation and personnel and whether we are running enough RPO/Counter/Power/Trap so teams can't run blitz duo with no fear?
Click to expand...
Well, if you had read anything that I've posted then you'd know that I think the correct word for it is predictable.
 
skyman said:
Beginning of game, defense looked scared to tackle.. he left our players running in mud.. dude is big and fasssst.. can't believe we just tried to line up and play wit brohm 2 weeks no special coverage to take away main #1 target.. just line up and see wat happens
Click to expand...
they always just line up and play. This staff doesn't scheme up teams, ever
 
Cribby said:
The stats say different. It’s a good OL but nothing like the hype.
Click to expand...
The only OL in our consistent rotation with a run blocking grade over 70 per PFF is Francis. Most of them are in the mid 60’s.

None of our TE’s have a run blocking grade over 57.

Like you said, the stats say different, and they’ve said different even before this game.
 
Back
Top