‘Don’t do anything stupid.’

[Brad_Wellson]

Saying you can't convince me is a direct sign I will not deny plain evidence.

Continuing to insult people as a method of debate and projecting your feelings and lack of insight is quite entertaining.

What the **** are you talking about?

You started a dumb thread that exposed you as a narrative peddler. Then you feverishly tried to cover for your obvious lack of ball knowledge by dancing around like a clown.

Rinse, repeat.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

FWIW, have never claimed to know anything about football. I do like learning about it, though.

I never said you claimed to. I just said that you're trying to cover for your lack of knowledge.

 

[StoneWallLoungeCane]

I think we need a couple more halfback dives.

The offensive “system” is a joke. Wario likes to try to prove how tough his team is, hence, 1st down runs up the gut for no gain.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

View attachment 339920


Yesterday was a good progression toward a more finished product, right? No? Which layer were we on? Can you enlighten us with some football knowledge?

Desperation in message board form.

What looked like layering was clearly just conventional week-to-week game planning by Dawson. Which, yes, is frustrating. We haven't seen a single QB keep on the inside zone since that game.

What any of this has to do with this stupid thread is beyond me.

You're lame as ****.

 

[LuCane]

What the **** are you talking about?

You started a dumb thread that exposed you as a narrative peddler. Then you feverishly tried to cover for your obvious lack of ball knowledge by dancing around like a clown.

Rinse, repeat.

A very obvious projection of your own behavior in this thread. Funny.

If I'm a narrative peddler for addressing what someone specifically said, you're doing the same for protecting what they said.

You've offered zero insight about anything football related. Just made accusations. Everyone can see that.

Let's keep going. I want to see how many posts you can make without offering a single bit of actual football commentary.

 

[MT-hurricane]

Two games in a row where the run game was awful . I don’t want to hear anything more about this being the best OL unit in cfb

Our run scheme has been very polarizing on this board. Some say we are very predictable and vanilla with the inside runs. Others say it serves its purpose in opening up the rest of the offense and being statistically efficient, preventing negative plays. Initially I sided with the former but eventually conceded it was working and we were wearing teams down that way and opening up the passing game.

BUT, last night we could have benefitted from some diversity in the run game. There is a reason the end around to Toney gave us some good looks and positive yards. We got in a hole early down by 2 scores and did not have early success with our usual inside runs. In addition to this defense was looking like they could get shredded all game so it changed how Mario/Dawson called the game and we went away from the run but couldn’t pass without getting picked off. That in addition to the careless penalties, we are lucky we did not get absolutely rocked by Louisville.

Mario’s biggest failure last night was his inability to get this team to cut down on the penalties. We are at best getting no better in that regard and possibly regressing. Inexcusable. If he and Mirabal are so good at coaching OL why are we still having so many false start penalties. Aside from Mario, Beck and Dawson both just crapped the bed horribly. We got outcoached and outdisciplined last night.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

A very obvious projection of your own behavior in this thread. Funny.

If I'm a narrative peddler for addressing what someone specifically said, you're doing the same for protecting what they said.

You've offered zero insight about anything football related. Just made accusations. Everyone can see that.

Let's keep going. I want to see how many posts you can make without offering a single bit of actual football commentary.

Keep filibustering.

You're a narrative peddler because you took a completely unrelated quote and tried to shoehorn it to this game where we did, in fact, do tons of stupid stuff!

That's what's so funny about his. You stretched an innocuous quote and then it didn't even fit your preconceived notion.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

Our run scheme has been very polarizing on this board. Some say we are very predictable and vanilla with the inside runs. Others say it serves its purpose in opening up the rest of the offense and being statistically efficient, preventing negative plays. Initially I sided with the former but eventually conceded it was working and we were wearing teams down that way and opening up the passing game.

It does work most of the time. Even when someone sells out to stop it (FSU).

But you have to take the easy throws and check downs, and move the chains.

Didn't happen last night.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

Now we have an administrator so shook that he's deleting posts.

 

[LuCane]

Desperation in message board form.

What looked like layering was clearly just conventional week-to-week game planning by Dawson. Which, yes, is frustrating. We haven't seen a single QB keep on the inside zone since that game.

What any of this has to do with this stupid thread is beyond me.

You're lame as ****.

Oh, oh. Your feelings are hurt. Another sign of weakness.

What looked like layering must have stopped cold. We saw a jet sweet when we were down multiple scores. Prior to that? Predictable and conservative gameplan/attack - the precise point of this thread.

Keep up.

 

[LuCane]

Keep filibustering.

You're a narrative peddler because you took a completely unrelated quote and tried to shoehorn it to this game where we did, in fact, do tons of stupid stuff!

That's what's so funny about his. You stretched an innocuous quote and then it didn't even fit your preconceived notion.

I wrote a similar amount you did and you called it a filibuster.

That word...innocuous. It doesn't mean what apparently you think it means. The coach directly said he has often made decisions this year specifically avoid doing something stupid.

That matches our attack in many ways. It partly led to playing catch up yesterday. Yesterday ended up in a loss. Basic math. Well, for most.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

Oh, oh. Your feelings are hurt. Another sign of weakness.

What looked like layering must have stopped cold. We saw a jet sweet when we were down multiple scores. Prior to that? Predictable and conservative gameplan/attack - the precise point of this thread.

Keep up.

LOL.

My feelings are hurt because you're obviously lame?

Filibuster on!

 

[LuCane]

Now we have an administrator so shook that he's deleting posts.

You know you can delete your own posts, too, right? I deleted my own repeat post asking you to comment on your own prior view. I made the post while you made the other one. Brad doesn't like facts. Brad is going to lash out now. More insults, Brad. That will make you feel better. Doubt very much that's how you address people in person, so the internet is good for people like you.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

I wrote a similar amount you did and you called it a filibuster.

That word...innocuous. It doesn't mean what apparently you think it means. The coach directly said he has often made decisions this year specifically avoid doing something stupid.

That matches our attack in many ways. It partly led to playing catch up yesterday. Yesterday ended up in a loss. Basic math. Well, for most.

Your word count per post is quite a bit more than mine, think tank.

We did a bunch of stupid things last night.

This thread is stupid and make literally zero sense.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

You know you can delete your own posts, too, right? I deleted my own repeat post asking you to comment on your own prior view. I made the post while you made the other one. Brad doesn't like facts. Brad is going to lash out now. More insults, Brad. That will make you feel better. Doubt very much that's how you address people in person, so the internet is good for people like you.

But you deleted yours because you're so shook that you are just blasting nonsense without reading.

 

[LuCane]

Your word count per post is quite a bit more than mine, think tank.

We did a bunch of stupid things last night.

This thread is stupid and make literally zero sense.

You're doing specific word counts? You have trouble reading a few more words?

 

[LuCane]

But you deleted yours because you're so shook that you are just blasting nonsense without reading.

Eh, I deleted it because it was a repeat. Are you...trying to create a false narrative while spending countless posts addressing what you claim is a false narrative? You won't answer that. Your whole approach is as weak as our gameplan last night. This is entertainment for me. Watching you cornered by your own projections. Could be a really fun day.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

You're doing specific word counts? You have trouble reading a few more words?

No, I just know what it means.

You're flailing.

 

[Brad_Wellson]

Eh, I deleted it because it was a repeat. Are you...trying to create a false narrative while spending countless posts addressing what you claim is a false narrative? You won't answer that. Your whole approach is as weak as our gameplan last night. This is entertainment for me. Watching you cornered by your own projections. Could be a really fun day.

No, you deleted it because you thought I didn't respond to the second part of your post.

But I did.

Then you scrambled to delete it.

 

[LuCane]

No, you deleted it because you thought I didn't respond to the second part of your post.

But I did.

Then you scrambled to delete it.

In a separate post after I made my own. Now you're moving the goal posts to this. Keep going. I'm filibustering and you're scrambling around making things up. All day long talking to a fake internet tough guy. Pure entertainment.