Search results

  1. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    All good man. Don't care about the negs, just like to learn. Cheers and thanks for your very kind words.
  2. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    OK, I'll beg mercy. I've never really seen that and this is the first time I've ever heard he was refusing to block, or making demands on his coaches. It begs the question, if the offensive coaching staff thought he was a "cancer", then why the **** was he getting so much more playing time...
  3. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    No, I @'ed you because you downvoted my post, so I was wondering why you disagreed. I usually DGAF about votes, but you're a good poster and I am genuinely interested. Then again, I think accidental votes happen all the time too, so could have just been that. On the other hand, now that I've...
  4. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    Welp, you've certainly opened my eyes. I don't recall ever having seen any of what you're saying reported previously. If that is all true, then he can definitely GTFO. You seem to be pretty clued in, so I'm going to take what you say and accept it at face value, but **** if that is all true...
  5. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    Cool. Thanks man. That has absolutely nothing to do with whether the team is better off with more scholarship players or fewer scholarship players.
  6. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    @1LuvCane I would love for you to help me understand where I am wrong. Where do you see our final scholarship numbers being entering spring practice? Thanks in advance.
  7. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    g8rh8rMD said: That's fine if the younger guys beat out Cager for PT. Again, you take Cager off the roster, that doesn't mean you free up a spot for someone else. All it means is we have 7 wr's instead of 8 and 78 scholarship players instead of 79, or whatever the actual final numbers will be...
  8. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    That's fine if the younger guys beat out Cager for PT. Again, you take Cager off the roster, that doesn't mean you free up a spot for someone else. All it means is we have 7 wr's instead of 8 and 78 scholarship players instead of 79, or whatever the actual final numbers will be. We are not in...
  9. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    Look at how the Rams use Robert Woods. If we do the same for Cager, he'd put up numbers. Think Woods/Cooks, Cager/JT4. Stack those guys and play them off each other. Regardless of whether you buy that or not, Cager has never been a problem for the coaches or the locker room, he has made big...
  10. g8rh8rMD

    Lawrence Cager

    Exactly. And he's only got one year left, so it's not like he's taking up a scholly that we could use somewhere else. IF he comes back, as long as he has to compete for reps and PT, I'm completely fine with it.
Back
Top