Search results

While we might disagree on some points, I hope you're right. When I was recruited, Miami was the **** and I graduated from S. FL. By the same token, FSU was a hot ticket too and UF was as well, but not to the same degree. Maybe players getting something rather than nothing will help, in...

Oh, it had, but then when you have more boosters from in state schools in said metropolitan area (nevermind other schools), it makes it tough. You're also blatantly ignoring how our brand became what it was nationally when we did ball out. It was a cultural difference between the players we...

Obviously not, but I think with my head and not my heart. College football is an arms race and the gap keeps getting wider.

There's OSU, Clemson, the Gates and Seminole in state, Texas, LSU, A&M, OU, OKState, Oregon, and lord if those west coast LA schools get organized with backers behind them, look out. Domers, Stanford, and basically any big school will be a problem. Miami is cool and all, but those schools got...

I won't ever throw in the towel, but I'm smart enough to see how the game has evolved and the money put into it. My short take, I don't expect a run like we had before.

Agree, but when a top tier recruit sees what he can get here and there's Bama showing what they've got, good luck.

As I say, something is better than nothing and while I don't like any of this, good for the young men. No shame in it and more than they had before.

People don't seem to understand FAIR MARKET VALUE at all. I'll just say this. Bama and some other current elites have a much higher FMV than most schools. As there is no prior value or asset to compare things to, they will set the upper limits of the fair market value.

Which sucks. It's all going to be about the Benjamin's. The big state schools with their large alumni bases will dominate the little guys if it's a free for all.