Search results

I know we need talent to win wings. We also need to beat other talented teams to win wings. So when talent is equal, who wins in the end? Teams with a schematic advantage. Enos' history doesn't lead me to believe he'll bring a schematic advantage to the table.

I'd rather get a coach that does more with less. You keep talking about him needing talent. Give me a guy that succeeded everywhere he went. That consistently got better with whatever he was given. Yost, Briles, a Frost-type, a guy like Dino Babers. Guys who succeeded and elevated the players...

Ok. He had one good offense coordinated. Talk to me about all his other offensive success. Why couldn't he build a successful offense at Central Michigan or sustain a successful one at Arkansas after that one good year? Seems like 2015 is an outlier in his career.

So the first year he got there he had good talent, but he couldn't maintain the talent level and the offense suffered because of it? Another coach that needs NFL talent to win. What happened to elevating players by putting them in positions to succeed. And how do you explain his subpar...

Another thing, Enos' best year at Arkansas was his first. As he got more of his guys into that offense the numbers slipped. Reminds me of a certain former Miami Hurricanes head coach that recently retired.

Now I see why @DMoney cherrypicked one season from Enos' entire catalog. The rest of his resume is completely underwhelming.

Yay! Let's bring in the QB who was benched by his QBC because he couldn't run the offense we'll likely be running at an efficient level.

Pro Style U, baby! That Arkansas offense also had a ******* mammoth OL. Believe its average weight was more than all but two NFL teams at the time.