Search results

  1. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Seems like one could do a pretty good amount of damage with forks as well. 🤷‍♂️
  2. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    That's why I question the way the article was written. It sounds to me like the guy was walking from house to house turning the ***** to see if he could walk in or something like that since they said he wasn't trying to force his way in. The article said he was arrested both times so that to...
  3. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Whoever wrote that article needs to go back to school. The guy was "allegedly attempting to break into homes". He writes "no force was used to make entry into the homes". Well, no homes were "entered" to begin with. From your descriptions, it sounds like the policing policies up there suck...
  4. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    I don't know. It's a Constitutional right. There is no age limit to Constitutional rights. We've gotta protect that 2A. :cool:
  5. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Mommy legally bought the gun according to reports.
  6. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    It wasn't just the few bad apples. It was the other apples who conveniently moved them to other congregations with little or no punishment. Who allowed them to continue preying on other victims. Plus, it was an issue that occurred throughout the US and the world as a whole. If this continues...
  7. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    He was freaked out I'm sure. The idea that it is strange that they want to ask him questions about it though is ridiculous IMO.
  8. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Don't worry about it. I'm sure there are plenty of jokes about it on open mic night in Chicago comedy clubs. They'll increase if stories like this crop up in other areas of the country like the Catholic controversy. Anytime those viewed as pious, above reproach, and who are given the...
  9. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

  10. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Dude, it's a freaking joke. Come on. I figured the guy in shades with a smirk on his face was a giveaway, but I guess not.
  11. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Yes, please post when available for investigative purposes :cool:
  12. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Like I said before, simple answer is just arrest Epps. He was a rabblerouser. It'll quiet down the conspiracists, but more importantly, the people who know better and are just using Epps to cast doubt on the hundreds of legitimate arrests. Being that he never entered the Capitol, I'm sure...
  13. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Agreed about that. It takes 2 to tango though. It was intended to be a true bi-partisan commission. They couldn't even agree on that. And it looks like 2 more years of it in the opposite direction. Not hearing too much about policy coming from the House.
  14. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    There's a lot of "or maybe's" that fit this situation. Respectfully, totally ignoring the event would not be one of them IMO.
  15. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    As I said a sliver of good news in a couple of cities. Not a definitivie sign of things to come. Nothing to do with liberal or conservative. A hopeful post for the new year. Thanks for crapping in the punch bowl though my man. I should know better.
  16. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    https://www.nyc.gov/site/nypd/news/p00070/nypd-citywide-crime-statistics-november-2022 Citywide shooting incidents decreased by 32.8% (80 v. 119) for the month – adding to the 16.2% (1209 v. 1442) decrease achieved year-to-date – driven by significant reductions in northern Manhattan, Brooklyn...
  17. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

  18. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Actually, 2 weeks earlier made the US look more Third World than anything else. When the inauguration happened, they were going to make sure none of that crap was happening again.
  19. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    By the fact they were found guilty by a 12 member jury. I don't think they get found guilty if they weren't interested in doing it or backed off.
  20. C

    Off-Topic Crime 2.0

    Some would say this stopped a crime that could have occurred. We have no idea one way or the other. With this mode of thinking, no more drug stings, prostitution stings, and the like. No more arrests of wives who mistakenly "hire" an undercover cop to kill their husbands. I'd argue if...
Back
Top