Search results

  1. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    You're nailing it. No final exams on New Year's Day, so this is TRULY a student-athlete-friendly initiative. The NCAA is really fulfilling its mission...
  2. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Hear me out... 68 teams...January Madness...
  3. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    The reason why Taint is Team #7 is because they did not even play in the conference championship game. Which sucks for them, since they seemingly had the BEST loss of any 1-loss team (a 6-point road loss to the #1 team).
  4. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Yeah, the two schools who might have some justifiable "1-loss" outrage are Georgia and Ohio Taint. Georgia had a 29-game winning streak cut short by a "neutral site" (Atlanta) THREE-POINT LOSS that (surprise, surprise) also included some questionable officiating. Ohio Taint lost ON THE ROAD by...
  5. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Completely and totally wrong.
  6. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    :cry:
  7. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    No. Wrong. More bull**** from you. SOS is an annual calculation, not a 15-year rolling average. **** off with that nonsense.
  8. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Wrong. Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong. "Injured players" can be used to differentiate between "otherwise comparable teams". Meaning, it's like a tiebreaker, NOT THE PRIMARY CRITERION. There were three undefeated Power 5 conference champions. NOW apply your "criteria" to determining who among...
  9. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Miami was ranked #5 going into that game. In today's system, we never even get a chance to play Nebraska.
  10. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    F$U was ranked ahead of UGa. So your entire premise is bull****.
  11. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Wrong. Re-read the criteria.
  12. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Here is what a lot of dopey "oh, but an injured QB should be the sole factor for knocking F$U out" don't comprehend. YOU IGNORE THE WORDS "OTHERWISE COMPARABLE". Here's the thing. Liberty and F$U are not "otherwise comparable". F$U and Alabama are not "otherwise comparable". If any of the...
  13. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    **** that bull****. You don't pick 2023 Final Four teams based on the past 15 years. Every conference has a down year of parity without a clearcut champion that towers over all others, and this was that year for the SEC. **** the SEC.
  14. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    There is no P5 any longer. Unless I missed the memo where the Pac 2 champ is still getting an automatic bid into the 12-team playoff.
  15. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    NOBODY KNOWS. First, Rodemaker would be able to play. Second, Milroe could have his leg shattered, same as what happened to Travis. NOBODY KNOWS. You don't choose the teams you pick for the Final Four because of who you think will win.
  16. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Yes. 100% yes.
  17. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Exactly. I don't care if Alabama was one of the best 4 teams "this weekend". They were NOT one of the best 4 teams ALL SEASON LONG.
  18. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Wrong. The SEC fix was in. "The Travis injury" is just the cover story. If Travis never broke his leg, Finebum and Sankey and the Alabama AD would have been yapping about "Strength of Schedule". Doesn't matter WHAT they cited, the SEC was still coming for F$U's spot, and was going to steal...
  19. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Yes. Because Jordan Travis is missing from the F$U defense...
  20. TheOriginalCane

    The ACC must go nuclear

    Wrong. Literally everything you say is either incorrect or impossible. "FSU will get their opportunity"? HOW? This is pure fiction.
Back
Top