Search results

I’m basing it on what you said…it was an if/then statement

If they’re waiting to fire him for cause, and were going to fire him anyway, it’s about saving the buyout.

Not really. Usc fired sark for cause the day after

Wtf are they doing if he can be fired with cause? Beyond stupid

not with clemson, who almost always makes the cfp. Last pac 12 team team was Washington ?

Disagree on the last part. Boosters only opened their pockets for Mario. They’ll only do it for the perfect candidate with Miami ties

Yes, cursed by bad decision making and repeating past failures…

Most Miami fans would have insisted that burrow was a no talent ***** in 2018, want him to transfer out, and want to start the freshman qb instead…

but he also ordered him to be transferred off the base…if his orders are always followed, why the two orders?

Why would you respond to me over a specific comment I never said or even defended? Wtf would I be asked to explain what someone else said? My guess is because you lost track of who you were arguing with and they stopped engaging so you lumpEd everyone who disagrees with you into one group...

You’re tripping over your clown shoes… I never ever said total offense INSTEAD of points scored. Show me where I said that. I very clearly and several times said they are correlated, so you can’t dismiss total yds as meaningless like you did for the “millionth time”. See, this is why I feel...

Maybe ask the person who wrote that…just a thought.

You said “Unless we are going to get a retroactive win against Texas A&M for out-yardaging them. Hey, we actually went 7-5 last year "by total offense". And the Duke game was MUCH closer...”. Did I miss where you talked about defense or turnovers in that post? And this isn’t a thread about...

we need Herbstreit to say it to get real traction…

All I’ll say is that 3rd down efficiency enables you to stay on the field to get more yardage and increase the likelihood of scoring. You need yds to get first downs so you can get more yds to get more first downs, so they’re connected unless you’re breaking huge plays for scores

lol at the “big buyout”. Don’t know what is true but it confirms that this is a complete cluster****. we Always were good at stepping over hundreds to pick up nickels…

sure, it’s so easy to mischaracterize what you said…its not which Is why I used a screenshot instead of just quoting a word or phrase like I did previously. And no one but you is conflating offense and wins, most likely because they realize defense, turnovers and ST also play a huge role in...

I find it hilarious how you say something unequivocally without any room for interpretation, then i merely mention that yds are highly correlated with pts, and you spend 4 paragraphs trying to explain that you didn’t actually say that, even after you supposedly said it a “million” times…

You literally said “**** off with all that yardage NONSENSE” and you apparently said it a million times… if that’s not dismissive, I don’t know what is. No one said anything similar like they dont care about points. And your sample size is Oregon over a couple years. I’m talking about the...

Echoes of Al golden sympathizers…yes points are the ultimate goal, but every statistical analysis shows there is a correlation between yds gained and points scored. In a small sample, you can score a lot of points with fewer yds, but it doesn’t hold up as the sample gets bigger. Use the yards...