Search results

You are dopey. You were wrong on "Rumph", but now you want to switch your earlier post to "Baker". Don't be mad at me because you (falsely) claimed that we retained Rumph to save money on a buyout. And, no, I have not been "defending" Rumph. That's just the convenient excuse you make when...

Underrated.

Why do people keep making this silly argument? I don't care what MANNY does. I care what BLAKE DOESN'T DO (and still gets paid for). We could have hired the LB Coach version of T-Rob.

Truth.

Of course. Groza. Patke did that.

First piece of good news in this entire thread.

Look, if Mullet can get NFL sniffs after going 8-4 with the best Gaytor offensive talent that McSharkfvcker can give him, then it's definitely possible for Manny to vault his way to the NFL if he wins 10 games next year using HIS system. At least, that's what I'm praying for.

Wrong. Rumph was at the END of his contract. We would have had to pay him ZERO-POINT-ZERO. Stop with your BS.

💯

12.

No.

I'm fine with Manny not wanting Baker to call the defense. I'm NOT fine with Manny not wanting ANYONE ELSE to call the defense but himself.

Have you considered the possibility that Manny saved the program tens of hundreds of dollars in unemployment compensation? WELL HAVE YOU?! Manny is playing 8D chess here. He has ALL the angles covered.