Podcast with Brian Hightower and Demarcus Van Dyke

Podcast with Brian Hightower and Demarcus Van Dyke

Peter Ariz
Peter Ariz

Comments (116)

Why we gotta play super sleuth to figure out who Dee is? LOL
 
Strangely, some of the better posts in this thread have mysteriously vanished.

And some of those posters probably wrongly got infractions by a Joe Philbin-esque queasy mod for insulting some insipid **** to quote [MENTION=4841]The Franchise[/MENTION].

Yes! Insulting the same poster over and over again in every thread he says something insipid is really what this board is all about. Please let D$ personally know that you disagree with his Joe Philbin-esque queasy modding and maybe we can make the most of Women's Day in 2017! #Persist !

I already did Eva. You guys are where I used to be with him....looking at him as a picked on victim and feeling sorry for him. Not anymore.
 
Strangely, some of the better posts in this thread have mysteriously vanished.

And some of those posters probably wrongly got infractions by a Joe Philbin-esque queasy mod for insulting some insipid **** to quote [MENTION=4841]The Franchise[/MENTION].

Yes! Insulting the same poster over and over again in every thread he says something insipid is really what this board is all about. Please let D$ personally know that you disagree with his Joe Philbin-esque queasy modding and maybe we can make the most of Women's Day in 2017! #Persist !

I already did Eva. You guys are where I used to be with him....looking at him as a picked on victim and feeling sorry for him. Not anymore.

Feelings of sympathy are nonexistent on my part, friend.

The problems are 1) harping on ANY issue in multiple threads ruins otherwise perfectly good conversation, and 2) no other poster is targeted so aggressively and consistently as brock. So what is seen as an acceptable standard as applied to targeting him serves as the model for all other behavior. If we say "yeah go ahead and attack REALSTREETCane2000 for posting XYZ because he's REALSTREETCane2000 lol" then there is no ground to enforce any other expectation on anyone else. You can put him on ignore. It's that simple. It's always been that simple. But the truth is you enjoy goading him and you know he'll respond.

It has nothing to do with protecting brock. I've dinged him multiple times for derailing threads or starting unnecessary ones. You actually cover up his "insipidness" by making him look like a victim. Amazingly ineffective tactic you guys have stumbled upon. But you all seem like reasonably intelligent people, which is why I circle back to the previous conclusion: you bob for apples in the toilet because you like it. You know ignoring him isn't as fun as ****ing him off. And yet if he was ignored more often he'd either change as a poster or probably be band by now because his own underlying annoyances would be so self-evident.
 
Advertisement
Strangely, some of the better posts in this thread have mysteriously vanished.

And some of those posters probably wrongly got infractions by a Joe Philbin-esque queasy mod for insulting some insipid **** to quote [MENTION=4841]The Franchise[/MENTION].

Yes! Insulting the same poster over and over again in every thread he says something insipid is really what this board is all about. Please let D$ personally know that you disagree with his Joe Philbin-esque queasy modding and maybe we can make the most of Women's Day in 2017! #Persist !

I already did Eva. You guys are where I used to be with him....looking at him as a picked on victim and feeling sorry for him. Not anymore.

Feelings of sympathy are nonexistent on my part, friend.

The problems are 1) harping on ANY issue in multiple threads ruins otherwise perfectly good conversation, and 2) no other poster is targeted so aggressively and consistently as brock. So what is seen as an acceptable standard as applied to targeting him serves as the model for all other behavior. If we say "yeah go ahead and attack REALSTREETCane2000 for posting XYZ because he's REALSTREETCane2000 lol" then there is no ground to enforce any other expectation on anyone else. You can put him on ignore. It's that simple. It's always been that simple. But the truth is you enjoy goading him and you know he'll respond.

It has nothing to do with protecting brock. I've dinged him multiple times for derailing threads or starting unnecessary ones. You actually cover up his "insipidness" by making him look like a victim. Amazingly ineffective tactic you guys have stumbled upon. But you all seem like reasonably intelligent people, which is why I circle back to the previous conclusion: you bob for apples in the toilet because you like it. You know ignoring him isn't as fun as ****ing him off. And yet if he was ignored more often he'd either change as a poster or probably be band by now because his own underlying annoyances would be so self-evident.

Oh no... I've stood up for him, especially when people call him a Golden Slurper. My position on him has changed. He's a real buttockswipe and he has a bunch of enablers propping him up. My thread which I started, and has since been deleted, warned people that infractions are being handed out at a higher level of scrutiny than before and I got a 2nd infraction for that for starting an unnecessary thread. Bullshît.

In the last week, Broke started a Luke thread and a Future thread and I guarantee there was no infraction for starting unnecessary garbage. I think a lot of us feel that the mods act arbitrarily and inconsistently in the way they meet out justice here.
 
View attachment 43489

I'm gonna go ahead and help solve that problem just for you.

Very moody art there with the lighting, Dee. We can almost see their faces.

View attachment 43495

Ill post another for u. My Sunday driver... #funkmsdaisy !

View attachment 43496
Anotha 1

View attachment 43498

This 1 the only time y'all will get a clue of who I am for the more resourceful.

DJ Williams is who I first thought you were.
 
Advertisement
And some of those posters probably wrongly got infractions by a Joe Philbin-esque queasy mod for insulting some insipid **** to quote [MENTION=4841]The Franchise[/MENTION].

Yes! Insulting the same poster over and over again in every thread he says something insipid is really what this board is all about. Please let D$ personally know that you disagree with his Joe Philbin-esque queasy modding and maybe we can make the most of Women's Day in 2017! #Persist !

I already did Eva. You guys are where I used to be with him....looking at him as a picked on victim and feeling sorry for him. Not anymore.

Feelings of sympathy are nonexistent on my part, friend.

The problems are 1) harping on ANY issue in multiple threads ruins otherwise perfectly good conversation, and 2) no other poster is targeted so aggressively and consistently as brock. So what is seen as an acceptable standard as applied to targeting him serves as the model for all other behavior. If we say "yeah go ahead and attack REALSTREETCane2000 for posting XYZ because he's REALSTREETCane2000 lol" then there is no ground to enforce any other expectation on anyone else. You can put him on ignore. It's that simple. It's always been that simple. But the truth is you enjoy goading him and you know he'll respond.

It has nothing to do with protecting brock. I've dinged him multiple times for derailing threads or starting unnecessary ones. You actually cover up his "insipidness" by making him look like a victim. Amazingly ineffective tactic you guys have stumbled upon. But you all seem like reasonably intelligent people, which is why I circle back to the previous conclusion: you bob for apples in the toilet because you like it. You know ignoring him isn't as fun as ****ing him off. And yet if he was ignored more often he'd either change as a poster or probably be band by now because his own underlying annoyances would be so self-evident.

Oh no... I've stood up for him, especially when people call him a Golden Slurper. My position on him has changed. He's a real buttockswipe and he has a bunch of enablers propping him up. My thread which I started, and has since been deleted, warned people that infractions are being handed out at a higher level of scrutiny than before and I got a 2nd infraction for that for starting an unnecessary thread. Bullshît.

In the last week, Broke started a Luke thread and a Future thread and I guarantee there was no infraction for starting unnecessary garbage. I think a lot of us feel that the mods act arbitrarily and inconsistently in the way they meet out justice here.

There is one common denominator in every thread that's derailed.... Brock.

He purposely injects himself in any and every conversation and always proceeds to take a hard line slurpper stance that conflicts with any rational opinion. Him gone helps this board.
 
Strangely, some of the better posts in this thread have mysteriously vanished.

And some of those posters probably wrongly got infractions by a Joe Philbin-esque queasy mod for insulting some insipid **** to quote [MENTION=4841]The Franchise[/MENTION].

Yes! Insulting the same poster over and over again in every thread he says something insipid is really what this board is all about. Please let D$ personally know that you disagree with his Joe Philbin-esque queasy modding and maybe we can make the most of Women's Day in 2017! #Persist !

I already did Eva. You guys are where I used to be with him....looking at him as a picked on victim and feeling sorry for him. Not anymore.

Feelings of sympathy are nonexistent on my part, friend.

The problems are 1) harping on ANY issue in multiple threads ruins otherwise perfectly good conversation, and 2) no other poster is targeted so aggressively and consistently as brock. So what is seen as an acceptable standard as applied to targeting him serves as the model for all other behavior. If we say "yeah go ahead and attack REALSTREETCane2000 for posting XYZ because he's REALSTREETCane2000 lol" then there is no ground to enforce any other expectation on anyone else. You can put him on ignore. It's that simple. It's always been that simple. But the truth is you enjoy goading him and you know he'll respond.

It has nothing to do with protecting brock. I've dinged him multiple times for derailing threads or starting unnecessary ones. You actually cover up his "insipidness" by making him look like a victim. Amazingly ineffective tactic you guys have stumbled upon. But you all seem like reasonably intelligent people, which is why I circle back to the previous conclusion: you bob for apples in the toilet because you like it. You know ignoring him isn't as fun as ****ing him off. And yet if he was ignored more often he'd either change as a poster or probably be band by now because his own underlying annoyances would be so self-evident.

Putting Broke on ignore is really pointless because he gets quoted by other posters more than anyone else on this board. So even when you have him on ignore, you really don't. I'm just saying.
 
the thing that most impressed me about the interview was his maturity. he seems like a kid that is well ahead of others. no games, no "look at me" etc.
 
Advertisement
Very moody art there with the lighting, Dee. We can almost see their faces.

View attachment 43495

Ill post another for u. My Sunday driver... #funkmsdaisy !

View attachment 43496
Anotha 1

View attachment 43498

This 1 the only time y'all will get a clue of who I am for the more resourceful.

DJ Williams is who I first thought you were.

same here. that was my initial guess months ago, now I have no clue.
 

View attachment 43498

This 1 the only time y'all will get a clue of who I am for the more resourceful.

DJ Williams is who I first thought you were.

same here. that was my initial guess months ago, now I have no clue.

Why doesn't [MENTION=4648]Pete[/MENTION] just ask who Brooklyn is? [MENTION=4648]Pete[/MENTION] has to know.
 

View attachment 43498

This 1 the only time y'all will get a clue of who I am for the more resourceful.

DJ Williams is who I first thought you were.

same here. that was my initial guess months ago, now I have no clue.

Why doesn't [MENTION=4648]Pete[/MENTION] just ask who Brooklyn is? [MENTION=4648]Pete[/MENTION] has to know.

ehhh..I think its fine we don't know. its not a big deal. besides, it should be up to brook to decide if he wants to say or not.
 
Advertisement

View attachment 43498

This 1 the only time y'all will get a clue of who I am for the more resourceful.

DJ Williams is who I first thought you were.

same here. that was my initial guess months ago, now I have no clue.

Dj is far too busy with the radio stuff & the brother jimmies & the clothes line to bother with coming on here as often as I do.
 
the thing that most impressed me about the interview was his maturity. he seems like a kid that is well ahead of others. no games, no "look at me" etc.

He's night & day from most kids in his spot. He knows his journey is just beginning but he never forgets how blessed he is to be in his shoes. He is an amazing kid. Y'all will see.
 

View attachment 43498

This 1 the only time y'all will get a clue of who I am for the more resourceful.

DJ Williams is who I first thought you were.

same here. that was my initial guess months ago, now I have no clue.

Dj is far too busy with the radio stuff & the brother jimmies & the clothes line to bother with coming on here as often as I do.
Are you a former rapper? That's my guess as to who you are
 
The only cane I can think of who sortve rapped was nate. Definitely not. 23 is right though. For numerous reasons I'm gonna keep that to myself. It's all good though.
 
Back
Top