articles
Comments (4481)
- Status
Eagerly awaiting Phil>Mensah.
But more importantly, how do you feel about blocking running backs.
You basically cannot appeal a TRO.
The problem is this Duke Mensah agreement also defers to the NCAA rules as taking precedence above any other arrangement. And NCAA rules, as granted by the SC state kids are free to transfer.
I asked around. Pops owns a big orthodontic practice in Newport Beach. Well connected guy. Zero chance Duke would try to leverage his son.
then the contract itself isnt a valid NIL contract and it is unenforceable
been years since ive went to court (im in house now so no more court life for me thank god), but i believe youre right. the TRO itself was improper in terms of the enrollment part.
USC needs WRs. Only thing I would be concerned about here.
Saw people saying it was incentive based? Which I thought NIL couldn’t do?
Yea i think it's very clear that the TRO was a bull**** attempt by a Duke booster (the judge) to give Duke some time to convince the kid to come back and or to raise more money to induce him to return.
Mueller coming to take snaps from the room year 1. He’s the truth
I watched Donno's podcast at lunch today because he had sports and entertainment lawyer and Miami grad, Alan K Fertel on talking about this case. This isn't a slam dunk for Miami at all. I am not typing it all out. He thinks they end up in a room hashing out a settlement where Miami probably pays a lot of money.
exactly what we been saying the whole time. Duke will get a buyout
Final thoughts and I'll stop spamming the board today:
Every NIL agreement must defer to the rules of the NCAA. In other words, you can't have a contract that stipulates that for example, in order to earn your money you must also take steroids and avoid attending class.
The NCAA was legally forced to allow transfers, and thus the right of a student athlete to leave his school is now as fundamental to the NCAA rules as the banning of PEDs and going to class, and thus should not be permitted in ANY NIL DEAL. Any deal made with such language should be invalidated by the NCAA itself.
Otherwise, I could create an NIL deal which stipulates the student may never be drug tested, or that a former NFL player could return, etc etc.
(BTW disclaimer im NOT A LAWYER so don't take this as authority in any way. Just seems logical to me)
Every NIL agreement must defer to the rules of the NCAA. In other words, you can't have a contract that stipulates that for example, in order to earn your money you must also take steroids and avoid attending class.
The NCAA was legally forced to allow transfers, and thus the right of a student athlete to leave his school is now as fundamental to the NCAA rules as the banning of PEDs and going to class, and thus should not be permitted in ANY NIL DEAL. Any deal made with such language should be invalidated by the NCAA itself.
Otherwise, I could create an NIL deal which stipulates the student may never be drug tested, or that a former NFL player could return, etc etc.
(BTW disclaimer im NOT A LAWYER so don't take this as authority in any way. Just seems logical to me)
Last edited:
"Hey Sidney, I'm the CIS Special advisor to the Mope Society" You are ******' my boy.
But does he know @DMoney ?? If he is not on Andijar and Levine's team, is he really that important?
LMAO SWFL , you are the BOMB
why dont the canes just do a side agreement to share the NIL profit with duke for the 1 year?
One man's trash is another man's trash as well. No thank you.
- Status
