I'm into results. If we see other team on ground quickly all is fine. If not, then Diaz has to go and go quickly. Personally, I want defense to deliver pain. That pain has huge benefits in 4th quarter.
There is a lot more slamming, or so it looks like, with the hawk tackle technique. I'm sure (if it works) the new technique will pay-off in the 4th quarter too.
Also, yeah safer, true. As a spectator who has no chance of suffering a concussion while watching the game, I LOVE that sound of someone just getting WRECKED (but not injured). I hope we still get some of that.
Seems like it would be hard to field a physical defense with this technique. (at least on the back 7) But then again, Seattle's doing it, so...
My only problem with tackling legs is that leg's move. RB's are chopping their feet, raising their knees, high stepping, etc etc etc. Leg's are violent and tend to be hard to grasp. You're also not gonna create many turnovers grabbing at legs. Fumbles are forced when you tackle the torso.
Honestly, I can see pros and cons with this technique. But maybe it is a better way. I'd like to learn more about it.
Two things: You don't hear a lot about injuries in rugby because no one cares about or talks about rugby. Two, rugby players are proficient in their technique because that's what they've been playing all their lives, and there aren't any Adrian Petersons in rugby that they're trying to tackle.Seems like it would be hard to field a physical defense with this technique. (at least on the back 7) But then again, Seattle's doing it, so...
My only problem with tackling legs is that leg's move. RB's are chopping their feet, raising their knees, high stepping, etc etc etc. Leg's are violent and tend to be hard to grasp. You're also not gonna create many turnovers grabbing at legs. Fumbles are forced when you tackle the torso.
Honestly, I can see pros and cons with this technique. But maybe it is a better way. I'd like to learn more about it.
Watch a rugby game. They bring tackling to an art form and they don't shy from contact either. You don't seem to hear the same injuries occurring in rugby which is a very physical sport with no padding for protection. I think it makes sense and explains why Diaz was having these guys start tackling early w/o pads when Spring practice began.
Two things: You don't hear a lot about injuries in rugby because no one cares about or talks about rugby. Two, rugby players are proficient in their technique because that's what they've been playing all their lives, and there aren't any Adrian Petersons in rugby that they're trying to tackle.Seems like it would be hard to field a physical defense with this technique. (at least on the back 7) But then again, Seattle's doing it, so...
My only problem with tackling legs is that leg's move. RB's are chopping their feet, raising their knees, high stepping, etc etc etc. Leg's are violent and tend to be hard to grasp. You're also not gonna create many turnovers grabbing at legs. Fumbles are forced when you tackle the torso.
Honestly, I can see pros and cons with this technique. But maybe it is a better way. I'd like to learn more about it.
Watch a rugby game. They bring tackling to an art form and they don't shy from contact either. You don't seem to hear the same injuries occurring in rugby which is a very physical sport with no padding for protection. I think it makes sense and explains why Diaz was having these guys start tackling early w/o pads when Spring practice began.
Diaz is priming everyone for a ****ty season defensively. His teams were terrible at tackling.
Two things: You don't hear a lot about injuries in rugby because no one cares about or talks about rugby. Two, rugby players are proficient in their technique because that's what they've been playing all their lives, and there aren't any Adrian Petersons in rugby that they're trying to tackle.Seems like it would be hard to field a physical defense with this technique. (at least on the back 7) But then again, Seattle's doing it, so...
My only problem with tackling legs is that leg's move. RB's are chopping their feet, raising their knees, high stepping, etc etc etc. Leg's are violent and tend to be hard to grasp. You're also not gonna create many turnovers grabbing at legs. Fumbles are forced when you tackle the torso.
Honestly, I can see pros and cons with this technique. But maybe it is a better way. I'd like to learn more about it.
Watch a rugby game. They bring tackling to an art form and they don't shy from contact either. You don't seem to hear the same injuries occurring in rugby which is a very physical sport with no padding for protection. I think it makes sense and explains why Diaz was having these guys start tackling early w/o pads when Spring practice began.
this is true...but you can always do a quick google search. All kinds of stuff being written comparing the two. And football seems to be taking some notice.
Concussions: Rugby Can Help Football | ThePostGame
Eyes through the thighs wrap and roll!
Eyes through the thighs wrap and roll!
It's drive for 5 actually..not roll
So we finally give the players a defensive scheme that they don't have to think much in, but then we give them something to think about each time they go to tackle a guy?
Ugh - my Texas friend warned me that, "you'll love the things Diaz says but you'll hate the results."
The Pros to Hawk Tackling: You can practice it everyday, without pads too.
The Cons to Hawk Tackling: Gives the players something to think about, and changes the way they've done something all their lives.
Side note though - Ohio St made the change in 2013 with the guidance of Coach Ash and Meyer (who had to be convinced), and they went on to win the 2014 title the next year and both gave great credit to their improvements in the tackling department.
Two things: You don't hear a lot about injuries in rugby because no one cares about or talks about rugby. Two, rugby players are proficient in their technique because that's what they've been playing all their lives, and there aren't any Adrian Petersons in rugby that they're trying to tackle.Seems like it would be hard to field a physical defense with this technique. (at least on the back 7) But then again, Seattle's doing it, so...
My only problem with tackling legs is that leg's move. RB's are chopping their feet, raising their knees, high stepping, etc etc etc. Leg's are violent and tend to be hard to grasp. You're also not gonna create many turnovers grabbing at legs. Fumbles are forced when you tackle the torso.
Honestly, I can see pros and cons with this technique. But maybe it is a better way. I'd like to learn more about it.
Watch a rugby game. They bring tackling to an art form and they don't shy from contact either. You don't seem to hear the same injuries occurring in rugby which is a very physical sport with no padding for protection. I think it makes sense and explains why Diaz was having these guys start tackling early w/o pads when Spring practice began.
this is true...but you can always do a quick google search. All kinds of stuff being written comparing the two. And football seems to be taking some notice.
Concussions: Rugby Can Help Football | ThePostGame
That is perfect example. Best way to stop using the head as a weapon? Go back to the leather helmet days. They'll stop sticking that head where it don't belong. Simple.
Eyes through the thighs wrap and roll!
It's drive for 5 actually..not roll
One of the tackles is eyes through thighs, wrap, and roll. "Hawk Roll"