forums

Year 3 (Miami 2024 vs Miami 2013)

GojiraCane

GojiraCane

All ACC
Joined
Dec 31, 2018
Messages
7,732
The following is a side-by-side roster comparison of current roster for the Miami Hurricanes in 2024 versus 2013.

Names in green denote incoming players in their first year in their respective teams:


1706476776474.png

1706476811912.png

1706476845998.png

1706476867682.png


AVERAGE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE
  • 2024: 1.84 years
  • 2013: 1.63 years
AVERAGE 247 RATING
  • 2024: 0.9002
  • 2013: 0.8704
2024 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Wide Receiver - .9243 vs .8848
  • Tight End - .9088 vs .8837
  • Running Back - .9094 vs .8910
  • Offensive Line - .8838 vs .8759
  • Quarterback - .8912 vs .8791
  • Defensive Tackle - .9050 vs .8654
  • Defensive End - .9287 vs .9124
  • Safety - .8911 vs .8672
  • Cornerback - .8964 vs .8866
  • Special Teams - .7789 vs .7344

2013 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)

None


NOTES
  • As with the 2009 team comparison, an item that immediately stands out is how thin 2013 was. Depth was fraught, with only 75 scholarship players on the team due to year over year attrition and self sanctioning. Defensive tackle featured an almost unbelievably low four players, while wide receiver stood at just seven (an additional wide receiver recruited in 2013 did not end up on the team).
  • 2013 Miami was an extremely young at safety, which had average experience of just 0.7 years
  • The 2024 Canes have 21 transfer players on their roster. 2013's team had two transfers
  • The 2013 Canes recruiting class had an average ranking for true freshmen of .8667. The 2024 Canes incoming freshmen average .9086
 
Advertisement
Just shows how rankings don't tell you everything. Looking at some of those 2013 players with ratings > 0.93
 
Advertisement
GojiraCane said:
The following is a side-by-side roster comparison of current roster for the Miami Hurricanes in 2024 versus 2013.

Names in green denote incoming players in their first year in their respective teams:


View attachment 281024
View attachment 281025
View attachment 281027
View attachment 281028

AVERAGE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE
  • 2024: 1.84 years
  • 2013: 1.63 years
AVERAGE 247 RATING
  • 2024: 0.9002
  • 2013: 0.8704
2024 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Wide Receiver - .9243 vs .8848
  • Tight End - .9088 vs .8837
  • Running Back - .9094 vs .8910
  • Offensive Line - .8838 vs .8759
  • Quarterback - .8912 vs .8791
  • Defensive Tackle - .9050 vs .8654
  • Defensive End - .9287 vs .9124
  • Safety - .8911 vs .8672
  • Cornerback - .8964 vs .8866
  • Special Teams - .7789 vs .7344

2013 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)

None


NOTES
  • As with the 2009 team comparison, an item that immediately stands out is how thin 2013 was. Depth was fraught, with only 75 scholarship players on the team due to year over year attrition and self sanctioning. Defensive tackle featured an almost unbelievably low four players, while wide receiver stood at just seven (an additional wide receiver recruited in 2013 did not end up on the team).
  • 2013 Miami was an extremely young at safety, which had average experience of just 0.7 years
  • The 2024 Canes have 21 transfer players on their roster. 2013's team had two transfers
  • The 2013 Canes recruiting class had an average ranking for true freshmen of .8667. The 2024 Canes incoming freshmen average .9086
Click to expand...
Thank you for the list. It is much appreciated.

Being that McCormick is such a freakish outlier for experience, what is the average experience for the 2024 team if you take him off the list?
 
Advertisement
Ispyin said:
We back or nah
Click to expand...
We're better, and getting better year over year.

I thought the Year 3 comparisons were interesting because in 2009 and 2013 both teams got off to strong starts (5-1 and ranked in the Top 10 in 2009, 7-0 and ranked in the Top 10 in 2013). This team should be much stronger than either with considerably more depth.
 
Advertisement
GojiraCane said:
The following is a side-by-side roster comparison of current roster for the Miami Hurricanes in 2024 versus 2013.

Names in green denote incoming players in their first year in their respective teams:


View attachment 281024
View attachment 281025
View attachment 281027
View attachment 281028

AVERAGE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE
  • 2024: 1.84 years
  • 2013: 1.63 years
AVERAGE 247 RATING
  • 2024: 0.9002
  • 2013: 0.8704
2024 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Wide Receiver - .9243 vs .8848
  • Tight End - .9088 vs .8837
  • Running Back - .9094 vs .8910
  • Offensive Line - .8838 vs .8759
  • Quarterback - .8912 vs .8791
  • Defensive Tackle - .9050 vs .8654
  • Defensive End - .9287 vs .9124
  • Safety - .8911 vs .8672
  • Cornerback - .8964 vs .8866
  • Special Teams - .7789 vs .7344

2013 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)

None


NOTES
  • As with the 2009 team comparison, an item that immediately stands out is how thin 2013 was. Depth was fraught, with only 75 scholarship players on the team due to year over year attrition and self sanctioning. Defensive tackle featured an almost unbelievably low four players, while wide receiver stood at just seven (an additional wide receiver recruited in 2013 did not end up on the team).
  • 2013 Miami was an extremely young at safety, which had average experience of just 0.7 years
  • The 2024 Canes have 21 transfer players on their roster. 2013's team had two transfers
  • The 2013 Canes recruiting class had an average ranking for true freshmen of .8667. The 2024 Canes incoming freshmen average .9086
Click to expand...

I’m going to add further to this:

2013-14 Miami Hurricanes
Record: 9-4
Leading Passer: Stephen Morris (3,028 yrds 21 TDs 12 ints)
Leading Rusher: Duke Johnson (920 yrds {6.3 ypc} 6 TDs)
Leading Receiver: Allen Hurns (1,162 yrds {18.7 ypr} 6 TDs)
Leading Tackler: Denzel Perryman (108 Tkls - 1 FF)
Leading Interceptions: Tracy Howard (4)
Leading Sacks: Tyriq McCord (4)
Record vs. Top 25: 1-2
Record vs. Teams That Finished w/ Winning Record: 3-3
Record vs. ACC: 5-3
Combined Record of opponents: 84-81
Total Offense Rank: 48th
Total Defense Rank: 89th

With the above mentioned roster data + the 2013 season data, I’ll stand by what I said: Zero excuses not to win 10+ games this yr.

We’ll field a better QB, better OL, better Def, better WR Room, & we’ll face 3 New HC (FAMU, Duke, Syracuse).
 
Advertisement
Wow, the lack of depth is what really stands out when comparing the 2013 team to the current roster. Our front line guys were good(Duke,Hurns), but you were really walking a very thin line when it came to injuries, etc.
 
GojiraCane said:
The following is a side-by-side roster comparison of current roster for the Miami Hurricanes in 2024 versus 2013.

Names in green denote incoming players in their first year in their respective teams:


View attachment 281024
View attachment 281025
View attachment 281027
View attachment 281028

AVERAGE COLLEGE EXPERIENCE
  • 2024: 1.84 years
  • 2013: 1.63 years
AVERAGE 247 RATING
  • 2024: 0.9002
  • 2013: 0.8704
2024 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)
  • Wide Receiver - .9243 vs .8848
  • Tight End - .9088 vs .8837
  • Running Back - .9094 vs .8910
  • Offensive Line - .8838 vs .8759
  • Quarterback - .8912 vs .8791
  • Defensive Tackle - .9050 vs .8654
  • Defensive End - .9287 vs .9124
  • Safety - .8911 vs .8672
  • Cornerback - .8964 vs .8866
  • Special Teams - .7789 vs .7344

2013 MIAMI POSITION ADVANTAGES (RATING)

None


NOTES
  • As with the 2009 team comparison, an item that immediately stands out is how thin 2013 was. Depth was fraught, with only 75 scholarship players on the team due to year over year attrition and self sanctioning. Defensive tackle featured an almost unbelievably low four players, while wide receiver stood at just seven (an additional wide receiver recruited in 2013 did not end up on the team).
  • 2013 Miami was an extremely young at safety, which had average experience of just 0.7 years
  • The 2024 Canes have 21 transfer players on their roster. 2013's team had two transfers
  • The 2013 Canes recruiting class had an average ranking for true freshmen of .8667. The 2024 Canes incoming freshmen average .9086
Click to expand...
Why?
 
Advertisement
Back
Top