forums

WR's How many do we take? We are in it for a lot of them

Advertisement
As for Nate Johnson. I like him a lot but my gut feeling tells me Richt gonna focus local first at WR and if one or both of Richards and Victor fall through, maybe he pursues Nate heavy.
 
Geo305 said:
As for Nate Johnson. I like him a lot but my gut feeling tells me Richt gonna focus local first at WR and if one or both of Richards and Victor fall through, maybe he pursues Nate heavy.
Click to expand...

Oops, Didn't meant to down vote.

How does Reginald Henderson compare to Victor? Anyone seen them both live and in pads?
 
There was already a previous thread about this awhile ago where I said 5-7. Honestly when a class is strong in one area one should take full advantage of it. I would take Mullin, bruce, willie johnson, richards, salomon and either mcdoom or ferguson(Ferguson can be a dynamic returner, he is faster than mckenzie from uga and only lost to killins by .02 in the 100m runing a 10.55). This is a reason I was skeptical about taking phillips. He is a dynamic athlete yes, but he is not a natural wr so it would take him time to develop at wr and we already have proven wr targets. Tre Nixon is another name we may get in mix with, orignally like uga and penn state and is from florida.
 
Back
Top