Was there ever any doubt with FSU's HAND PICKED 78 year old JUDGE making the decision?? LOL
Was there ever any doubt with FSU's HAND PICKED 78 year old JUDGE making the decision?? LOL
The reports? You mean the ones prepared by the same law enforcement agency who did a negligent job at best of investigating this thing? With a lead detective who did private contracting work for FSU boosters on the side? And who also allowed two huge pieces of evidence that could've answered every key question in this case (the Potbelly's surveillance vids and the cell phone vid of the actual encounter) to be destroyed? Lol. There are like 20 cameras recording in Potbelly's every night. But this flatfoot would rather interview a bunch of drunk bar patrons weeks later to find out what happened.
Not guilty due to lack of evidence. Of course, there's no evidence because of FSU and the cops. Gotta love it.
Agreed, it was slow rolled with a purpose.
Here is Major Harding's Bio...It was in the bag:
http://www.ausley.com/attorney-profile/major-b-harding
I skimmed through it but didn't notice anything that would suggest a conflict. Did I miss it?
i bet the majority of the people who posted in this thread did not read any of the "evidence" gathered about this so called rape. it is obvious that this girl is lying about the entire episode. her friend's statements contradict her account, and the blood and toxicology reports dispute her account. but, dont let that stop you from blind hate.
i bet the majority of the people who posted in this thread did not read any of the "evidence" gathered about this so called rape. it is obvious that this girl is lying about the entire episode. her friend's statements contradict her account, and the blood and toxicology reports dispute her account. but, dont let that stop you from blind hate.
+10000
We need to put our team allegiance aside. This girl tried to destroyed this young man. How many times will he have to go before some legal entity. I'm a cane fan but my goodness, I don't want to see anyone rape or wrongfully charged with rape. The judge wasn't in on anything. Both parties were presented with 3 judges with the opportunity to strike 1. The accuser struck one judge and Hameis struck another. It's only a game but when all the evidence points to a girl lying I don't think an argument regarding "covering up" can be disputed.
Jesus...
Idiot boy. The chick had a rape kit administered at the hospital. Blood and toxicology showed no evidence of drugs and her bal was way below the limit where one can be considered "blackout" drunk.
The accuser's own friends impeach her testimony. She was not drunk when she left the club and she was not forced into the taxi.
The chick got embarrassed and decided to ruin this guy and it is a shame that so many people form opinions without reading the facts.
Jesus...
Idiot boy. The chick had a rape kit administered at the hospital. Blood and toxicology showed no evidence of drugs and her bal was way below the limit where one can be considered "blackout" drunk.
The accuser's own friends impeach her testimony. She was not drunk when she left the club and she was not forced into the taxi.
The chick got embarrassed and decided to ruin this guy and it is a shame that so many people form opinions without reading the facts.
Yeah, pray to Jesus to give you some brains Florida Stupid University boy, since obviously the sum of your Law Enforcement experience was a ride along with Barney Fife.
Do you even know the Florida Statute concerning Sexual Battery? You probably think it is, uh, "the date rape law." Try 794.011 Sexual battery.—
Here is an extract so you realize it is not just about "getting a chick drunk"
2. The offender coerces the victim to submit by threatening to use force or violence likely to cause serious personal injury on the victim, and the victim reasonably believes that the offender has the present ability to execute the threat.
3. The offender coerces the victim to submit by threatening to retaliate against the victim, or any other person, and the victim reasonably believes that the offender has the ability to execute the threat in the future.
Hmm, so if the TPD were real police and not Felonies Smothered University's hired goons, the video of the incident could have revealed Jameis coerceing her with such threats in order to commit the elements of the crime. No drugs, no alcohol needed, dippy. But, thanks to them more concerned about F$U and its cash, they didn't pursue the case worth a ****, $#!+head.
Your "university" is a joke of a school and an epic beating on the football field of your beloved Criminoles is coming your way...I hope the coming depression consumes you.
Read the evidence, kid has been innocent of this for a while. Throw your FSU hatred aside and just read the evidence. The chick was lying through her teeth. Her friend screwed it up for her, and she had to admit to her dad that she was a mudshark and she couldn't do it, so she said she was raped.
Jesus...
Idiot boy. The chick had a rape kit administered at the hospital. Blood and toxicology showed no evidence of drugs and her bal was way below the limit where one can be considered "blackout" drunk.
The accuser's own friends impeach her testimony. She was not drunk when she left the club and she was not forced into the taxi.
The chick got embarrassed and decided to ruin this guy and it is a shame that so many people form opinions without reading the facts.
Yeah, pray to Jesus to give you some brains Florida Stupid University boy, since obviously the sum of your Law Enforcement experience was a ride along with Barney Fife.
Do you even know the Florida Statute concerning Sexual Battery? You probably think it is, uh, "the date rape law." Try 794.011 Sexual battery.—
Here is an extract so you realize it is not just about "getting a chick drunk"
2. The offender coerces the victim to submit by threatening to use force or violence likely to cause serious personal injury on the victim, and the victim reasonably believes that the offender has the present ability to execute the threat.
3. The offender coerces the victim to submit by threatening to retaliate against the victim, or any other person, and the victim reasonably believes that the offender has the ability to execute the threat in the future.
Hmm, so if the TPD were real police and not Felonies Smothered University's hired goons, the video of the incident could have revealed Jameis coerceing her with such threats in order to commit the elements of the crime. No drugs, no alcohol needed, dippy. But, thanks to them more concerned about F$U and its cash, they didn't pursue the case worth a ****, $#!+head.
Your "university" is a joke of a school and an epic beating on the football field of your beloved Criminoles is coming your way...I hope the coming depression consumes you.
The problem is that she alleges she was drugged and or blacked out. So you can't exclude the statements she made to police when her friend called the police to report a rape (actually stated she was hit in the head). Only now, when tox reports, physical evidence, and her friends testimoney's dispute that claim does she say it was intimidation and being scared.
And as far as the video, Casher said it was deleted the same night because he didn't record much of anything. Winston wasn't identified until a month after the fact.
Read the evidence, kid has been innocent of this for a while. Throw your FSU hatred aside and just read the evidence. The chick was lying through her teeth. Her friend screwed it up for her, and she had to admit to her dad that she was a mudshark and she couldn't do it, so she said she was raped.