forums

Will MC turn Cam Ward loose?

OrangeBowlMagic said:
It's because people have no idea what they watch.

- We called 32 passes and 22 runs vs A&M

- We called 37 passes and 46 runs vs GT, but the final drive before the Chaney fumble was 10 runs 0 passes

- We called over 50 passes and just barely over 20 runs against UNC, a game we were trailing mostly in the 2nd half

- We called 30 passes and 26 runs in a game against UVA where TVD was absolutely SHOOK

- We called 42 passes and 28 runs vs NC State, another game our QB was on another planet

- We called 40 passes and 35 runs against BC, a game we were up 3 scores at the half and end of the 3rd quarter

- We called 41 passes and 24 runs vs Louisville

In the games that were competitive, we threw the ball a TON. Yes, in games against good defenses started by a true freshman project, we were conservative. No ****. In the games where our starting quarterback played, we were anything but. But it's not fun to talk about this when you can just say "BrO sTYlE BrOOOOO"
Click to expand...
There is also different (and accurate perspective) defintions of "balanced" run vs pass play calling counts as well.

Far too many folks don't realize that.
 
Advertisement
E1k said:
Not really, we threw alot even in the tvd fall off..Gtech we threw 36 times,Unc 48 times,Virginia 30 times,nc state 38, Louisville 39, bc 36

Its probably 50/50 overall cause of the games emory started and the early games where we were up alot. We were a pass first team all last year when our starter was healthy, idk why people are so worried about mario letting cam loose bro he let a qb playing bad throw way more than he should have

Its always been about what you are doing not how much are u doing it, i understand its easier for some of the fanbase to only understand the how much part tho
Click to expand...
We were a long handoff passing game type team. Far from explosive against good defenses. We probably were at the top of the ACC in screen passes thrown. Take those screens stop routes and short outs out of the pass attempts and those pass run metrics change. We didn't throw the ball vertically much and teams compressed the field in the pass and run game.
 
HardCane said:
We were a long handoff passing game type team. Far from explosive against good defenses. We probably were at the top of the ACC in screen passes thrown. Take those screens stop routes and short outs out of the pass attempts and those pass run metrics change. We didn't throw the ball vertically much and teams compressed the field in the pass and run game.
Click to expand...
Thats why i say its about how u pass/run not how much u do it
 
OrangeBowlMagic said:
It's because people have no idea what they watch.

- We called 32 passes and 22 runs vs A&M

- We called 37 passes and 46 runs vs GT, but the final drive before the Chaney fumble was 10 runs 0 passes

- We called over 50 passes and just barely over 20 runs against UNC, a game we were trailing mostly in the 2nd half

- We called 30 passes and 26 runs in a game against UVA where TVD was absolutely SHOOK

- We called 42 passes and 28 runs vs NC State, another game our QB was on another planet

- We called 40 passes and 35 runs against BC, a game we were up 3 scores at the half and end of the 3rd quarter

- We called 41 passes and 24 runs vs Louisville

In the games that were competitive, we threw the ball a TON. Yes, in games against good defenses started by a true freshman project, we were conservative. No ****. In the games where our starting quarterback played, we were anything but. But it's not fun to talk about this when you can just say "BrO sTYlE BrOOOOO"
Click to expand...
Majority of people don’t know why its working when it is working so its not surprising they blame the wrong **** when it goes wrong
 
Last edited:
OrangeBowlMagic said:
It's because people have no idea what they watch.

- We called 32 passes and 22 runs vs A&M

- We called 37 passes and 46 runs vs GT, but the final drive before the Chaney fumble was 10 runs 0 passes

- We called over 50 passes and just barely over 20 runs against UNC, a game we were trailing mostly in the 2nd half

- We called 30 passes and 26 runs in a game against UVA where TVD was absolutely SHOOK

- We called 42 passes and 28 runs vs NC State, another game our QB was on another planet

- We called 40 passes and 35 runs against BC, a game we were up 3 scores at the half and end of the 3rd quarter

- We called 41 passes and 24 runs vs Louisville

In the games that were competitive, we threw the ball a TON. Yes, in games against good defenses started by a true freshman project, we were conservative. No ****. In the games where our starting quarterback played, we were anything but. But it's not fun to talk about this when you can just say "BrO sTYlE BrOOOOO"
Click to expand...
Agree with everything u said. The O is gonna be great just hope the D will be good enough to get stops and TO I feel like we haven’t gotten many since year 1 of the chain
 
Dwinstitles said:
I stand corrected this may be part two to that original video. Read and watch before you post. Neg away OP I deserve it


The big reason it was 50/50 run and pass were those interceptions. Those ints weren’t at time great coverage it was thrown into double coverage or right into the defense hands like Neil Odonnel to Larry Brown in the Super Bowl type ****. And once you got someone doing that you are just going to say **** it we have to run today.

It was a big slide from the first half of the year to the end. It looked like dude was just throwing away games (TVD) even though I think that’s tinfoil throwing away games, some of the throws were weird asf.
Click to expand...
I won’t rehash my rants….

But TVD went completely AWOL..

Complete mental meltdown. Though it is Mario’s fault for the QB situation being what is was last year.

Super happy him and the Collective went all out on WARD!
 
Back
Top