www.wsj.com
I thought sports teams had a waiver.Even if UCLA to the Big Ten doesnt happen, Arizona is being added to the "banned" states, so neither they nor Cal should be able to travel there for a game.
Opinion | Will California Law Allow UCLA to Play in the Big Ten?
Sacramento officially deplores much of the Bruins’ new conference.
He's justified his trip as a personal travel, which falls outside of the state law.I'm sure they'll find a way around it.
Gavin Newsom takes vacation to Montana — one of 22 states that California bans state-funded travel to over anti-LGBTQ policies
Newsom departed for a vacation to the Treasure State on Friday but did not initially announce where he was going. He did not travel using state funds.news.yahoo.com
Bingo!He's justified his trip as a personal travel, which falls outside of the state law.
The question about California teams traveling to banned states has come up before. I've read in the past that if push comes to shove, away games could be funded through boosters as "private" or "personal" travel outside of school funding. So for example, if noted celebrity I.Luve California provides a private, chartered 767 to UCLA to travel to and from Arizona, and also pays for hotel and incidentals, that would be the way around the law.
This article mentions it as well - they can likely still travel as long as they do not use state travel.
California bans state-funded travel to Indiana over transgender sports law
Aside from an ongoing lawsuit, it's the first backlash to the new law since it went into effect July 1.www.indystar.com
He's justified his trip as a personal travel, which falls outside of the state law.
The question about California teams traveling to banned states has come up before. I've read in the past that if push comes to shove, away games could be funded through boosters as "private" or "personal" travel outside of school funding. So for example, if noted celebrity I.Luve California provides a private, chartered 767 to UCLA to travel to and from Arizona, and also pays for hotel and incidentals, that would be the way around the law.
This article mentions it as well - they can likely still travel as long as they do not use state travel.
California bans state-funded travel to Indiana over transgender sports law
Aside from an ongoing lawsuit, it's the first backlash to the new law since it went into effect July 1.www.indystar.com
This law is weird. I can see the intent is for the state government not to be doing business with states that discriminate and that's not necessarily bad, but the execution is troubling where it could have unintended consequences. It also doesn't make sense, because you need to do business with other states and countries that you don't agree with.He's justified his trip as a personal travel, which falls outside of the state law.
The question about California teams traveling to banned states has come up before. I've read in the past that if push comes to shove, away games could be funded through boosters as "private" or "personal" travel outside of school funding. So for example, if noted celebrity I.Luve California provides a private, chartered 767 to UCLA to travel to and from Arizona, and also pays for hotel and incidentals, that would be the way around the law.
This article mentions it as well - they can likely still travel as long as they do not use state travel.
California bans state-funded travel to Indiana over transgender sports law
Aside from an ongoing lawsuit, it's the first backlash to the new law since it went into effect July 1.www.indystar.com
