forums

Why Richt won't abandon a pro style set!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 13422
  • Start date Start date
Advertisement
Stubborn *******

I want this all to burn to the ground. Recruiting already sucks so who cares

Hope Paul Chryst does us a solid tomorrow and embarrasses this demented ****
 
Can a pro set be successful with the abundance of talent at TE, RB and WR we had this year? Of course it can. This staff limits its self
 
AUcane said:
Can a pro set be successful with the abundance of talent at TE, RB and WR we had this year? Of course it can. This staff limits its self
Click to expand...

QB play is kind of important ... and ours has been historically bad.
 
Advertisement
MIATL said:
Richt runs exactly what he wants to run. And he came to Miami to run it.

He’s not changing his scheme. He’s not hiring someone else to implement another offense. He’s going to recruit and coach what we’ve seen the past 3 years. And he’ll eitter acquire the talent necessary to make it work, or he won’t. But he ain’t changing his stripes.

Especially not when Alabama, UGA, Michigan, and LSU are top 10 teams using similar systems. Richt, absolutely, thinks he can win running his idea of pro-style.
Click to expand...

Ah, we have a winner.
 
Meast21 said:
It's turned into a vicious downward spiral. Pro-style should attract recruits (ex. Fields says he prefers pro style team) but the results on the field suck so then big time recruits (like Fields, Hasselwood) dont come. Recruiting sucks, results on field get worse. Rinse and repeat. If Richt refuses to change, either we need the few recruits we did land to all be studs or we need a dominant QB (personally think Jarren is this team's only real hope over the next 1-2 years barring some lucky QB transfer). Insanely frustrating to watch it play out...
Click to expand...
Well said.
 
It's too precise of an offense to work in today's landscape imo. Incorporate elements sure but don't just run that.

No schools are running straight pro-style offenses anymore except Iowa, and they run it better than us only featuring two TEs and a QB that has never completed over 55% in his career.

 
gacaneaddict said:
Richts offense looks good when he has a solid OL, Aaron Murray tossing dimes, and when he can hand it off to Todd Gurley.

Problem is we have none of the 3.
Click to expand...

Problem is CMR knew we didn't have any of the 3, but still called plays like we did.

Signed,

Peruche
 
WTF does "pro style" mean anymore. A ton of the most successful concepts being used in the NFL originated in college.

Our offense isn't pro, college, spread or whatever, it's just Shicht.
 
Advertisement

Attachments

  • B444874F-57F1-4550-9BDA-5E50C0335405.webp
    B444874F-57F1-4550-9BDA-5E50C0335405.webp
    2.7 KB · Views: 0
gacaneaddict said:
Richts offense looks good when he has a solid OL, Aaron Murray tossing dimes, and when he can hand it off to Todd Gurley.

Problem is we have none of the 3.
Click to expand...
That’s dead on. Richt should adjust to talent. If Belichick can do it, Richt should not have an ego issue. But I am also not sure Perry can really thrive in any scheme. Williams is the last hope for the near future. No quality QB means your team will suck regardless of what plays are called. Look at ND and Clemson and Alabama and Oklahoma. 4 great QBs. Put Rosier in on any of those teams. Party is over before it starts. Perry too.
 
ssvir said:
QB play is kind of important ... and ours has been historically bad.
Click to expand...

Of course it’s been bad but it’s not anemically bad like our offense is. This offense is square peg/round hole play around the abilities of our QBs
 
Back
Top