Who the **** is 0

[Da Jumbo Mutombo]

I know for a fact the screen displayed the holding call on Clarke.

I have no idea if the screen was correct.

 

[OriginalCanesCanesCanes]

I’d checked out already but as I looked up from watching **** on my phone , I mean checking my portfolio I saw a number 0 at lb. Maybe I was tripping.

LOL - watches **** on his phone.

Helpful Hint: iPads were specifically invented for **** watching.

 

[3rd-43]

Clarke was an ATH, right?

Athlete, cb, wr. Don’t matter manny and rumph got it

 

[Canes4Life88]

I know for a fact the screen displayed the holding call on Clarke.

I have no idea if the screen was correct.

Didn’t have the desire to go back and check, but I thought the refs announced the incorrect number and I assumed it was meant to be on Wiggins.

 

[TheEye]

Ned Reed

Whatchoo know about me, boy? It's Zero Ned Reed, boy!

 

[Da Jumbo Mutombo]

Didn’t have the desire to go back and check, but I thought the refs announced the incorrect number and I assumed it was meant to be on Wiggins.

Yea I cant rewatch this game lol. But I thought Wiggins was the one who caught the screen. Idk all a blur

 

[BoxingRobes]

There wasn’t a zero in at lb late?

I am pretty certain it was Balom just playing up close.

 

[Cribby]

It was def Balom, I was sitting a few rows up behind the UM sideline and was wondering why he was switching jerseys during the game...I thought it was just a jersey malfunction or something, but makes sense he had to do it during ST plays.

Maybe he just stayed in 0 after st’s. I think the case has been solved.

 

[The Franchise]

There was definitely a 0 in on defense late. Looked like Huff's body type, and it seemed like 0 was playing LB, but maybe it was Balom just keeping the 0 on.

 

[OldhamA]

It was def Balom, I was sitting a few rows up behind the UM sideline and was wondering why he was switching jerseys during the game...I thought it was just a jersey malfunction or something, but makes sense he had to do it during ST plays.

I think it's silly that we ever get into that situation RE players having the same numbers and not being able to play them both on STs. But then I'm someone who wishes WRs would go back to 80s in the NFL.

I love that our answer to this is the #0. It's a stupid number that's become popular this year.

 

[OldhamA]

There was definitely a 0 in on defense late. Looked like Huff's body type, and it seemed like 0 was playing LB, but maybe it was Balom just keeping the 0 on.

I thought he was a LB too - he looked bigger than Balom and was making plays where you'd expect a LB to be, but by that point it was 4am and I'd lost the will.

 

[Sigma_Cane_7]

TrumpyCane thinks you were starting to see too many vaginas

On his phone or on the TV watching the game???

 

[Canes Legacy]

Photos to confirm it was Balom. Check the asymmetric gear.

 

[Canes Brotherhood]

Somebody said it was Balom. Switched number for STs or something.

Better question, anybody catch that holding call on the WR screen called on Marcus Clarke.

Was that correct? Clarke is getting burn at WR?

Right. On ST they use 0 and 32 when 2 players have the same number. 32 last time was Few

 

[423Hurricane]

I saw that too and I thought WTF! I started scrambling on my phone and laptop trying to figure out who the **** that was. I think I even asked in the Game Day board who that was.