D
Deleted member 26015
Guest
I love you but thats a question no one should ask.If we didn't have a King at QB?
Truth is: He is here. So I dont worry about the if until he isnt here anymore.
I love you but thats a question no one should ask.If we didn't have a King at QB?
I think they would've been okay. Not a good, I think they would've been stuck with Tribusky but Andy wouldn't have finally gotten one.
But the point of this post is to just observe reactions, posts and porsts alike. Because I see other posts. Mopes, rational fans and sunshine pumpers and those in between either happy and 7-1 and if course, the myth of the mope who points out our deficiencies, but I only said what I said because imagine if we didn't have King. He a huge reason we are where we are at. He does mask our weaknesses a lot and getting us those wins we lost last year. Ppl can say my post is a dumb take, but its the internet, who cares what someone thinks about my take someone's thinking what I'm thinking and FRFR, I think we are too quick to call someone a mope when most of the time they are pointing out a weakness that can not us in the *** in the long run. I'm cool with 7-1 right now cause it could be worse. Not a great performance today, but with a game almost canceled with 11-13 players out, I'm happy with this win, and thank the football gods for King.
Or the portal in general. Bringing in Roche, Phillips and Bolden on D, plus a very good QB and kicker really saved Manny's job. We would be abysmal without.If we didn't have a King at QB?
People just love to be miserableYeah this is a porst. He's on the team. Forget all the what ifs
This isnt funny. We very well could be without king. 2-6 at the most
Oh I agree. But again I posted this because of the we are a horrible 7-1 team. We know our weaknesses. We had 11 players out. I'm happy we got the win.I love you but thats a question no one should ask.
Truth is: He is here. So I dont worry about the if until he isnt here anymore.